This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'ConCOVE Board'.

CONCOVE BOARD MEETING MINUTES – 13 OCTOBER 2021 
NEXT MEETING: WEDNESDAY 17 OCTOBER 2021, 9AM – 12PM, MICROSOFT TEAMS  
 
WELCOME AND ADMIN  
ATTENDEES: 
Co-Chairs  
 
 
Phil Hokianga, Graham Burke  
Board Members  
Heather MacKay, Nick Clayton, Amos Kamo, Honor Columbus, Martin Carroll, 
David Fabish, Pamela Bell, Craig West 
General Manager  
 
Bharti Raniga 
In Attendance   
 
Vanessa Nash (ConCOVE Executive Assistant) 
Apologies 
 
 
Bharti joined the meeting approx. 10.30 
                                                          Heather MacKay left the meeting at 11.00 
 
AGENDA: 
Whakatau and Karakia
  
Given by Phil.   
Administration 
Introductions   
 
All 
Updates 
 
 
Given by everyone. 
Register of Interests 
 
No new interests.   
Minutes of last meeting 
Confirmed by David Fabish, seconded by Craig West.    
Correspondence  
 
Nil.     
Actions Table   
 
Updated. Action - update due dates, focus on them.  Phil, Graham and Bharti to  
 
 
 
 
edit and update before next meeting. (Action Register #136).   
Risk Register 
 
 
Revised high risks only.   
Board-Only Time 
 
Occurred    
Closing Karakia  
 
Given by Phil 
 
1.  General Manager’s Monthly Report  
a. 
Finances 
 
included in report    
b. 
Activity 
 
included in report 
c. 
Recruitment  
included in report 
d. 
Projects 
 
included in report  
GM Report –  
  Covid challenges throughout the team.  100% first vaccination for staff, nearing 100% for double 
vaccinated, staff have made their own choices.   
Highs and lows with staff in isolation, daily meetings.   
  Rescoped projects with Martin – going back to original TEC deliverables.  Understanding expectations and 
requirements. 
  Performance meeting with TEC was positive with TEC accepting contractual performance is being met.  – 
TEC expressed interest in the new focus areas in report. 
  Development of an MoU with Waihanga Ara Rau WDC is underway.   
  Cultural competency training for staff is planned, delayed due to Covid. 
  Ethics approval underway. 
  Financial forecast – delays in appointing staff have led to variances in budgeted expenditure.   
 
Finances –  
  Expenditure is tracking well with an excess of $1.6m available at the moment.  Unused funds have been 
transferred to next year’s budget and is available should we need it in 2021.   
  Annual report has been reforecast, based on change in salaries, different structure with less researchers, 
investment in data collection.  Costs of QA review panel have been added.   
  Revised budget for the TEC Annual Report has been shared with the Board.   
 
Projects –  
  Update on projects given.  Deliverables and timings added. 
  Board wants a stakeholder engagement plan established for each project.   
  Currently Project Leads report every engagement to Bharti and an engagement register is being built.  

  Summary to be added to Board papers. (Action Register #139).  
  How will surveys be implemented?  For example, what are the plans for retirees and how to contact 
them?   
The team is working on research methodology and questions at the moment, plan is to launch in 
December.  Will share with Board when we have it.  (Action Register #139) 
  Diversity – Bharti heading it with Lydia Harrell as a Researcher.   
Advertisement for Diversity Project Lead is in progress. Hasn’t been approved due to MIT understanding 
that we were putting a pause on this project.  Now actioned.   
  Concern that Bharti is putting time into Diversity project to meet deadlines, but quality standards may not 
be being met.   
  Discussion about unpacking pastoral care as a final action. Being discussed with all Advisory Groups.  
Wants information from Diversity included in other other projects as appropriate.     
  Bharti to share job descriptions for Project Lead vacancies with Board as soon as they are available, so 
that Board members can assist in sharing through their networks. (Action Register #141).   
   Discussion regarding whether we are able to continue with all projects per original plan, when we only 
have 3 project leads?  Short of Entry or Career Progression, Diversity, Career Framework.  
   Concern that we are spreading too thin.  Entry / Career Progression are both being run by Tony. Diversity 
–being run by Bharti and Lydia.   
  Lydia’s background as a professor has been on diversity.  They are managing writing up research questions 
and taking on stakeholder engagement, however, when getting results and data, doing analytics, it will 
become testing – this is why we need these positions filled.   
   Approvals are in system; Martin hadn’t approved them as he had a direction that we would focus on the 
three projects before going into other ones.  He will be guided by Board on this.   
  Might be wise to show we can do 3 projects well, see some wins before we expand, or do we have 
confidence we can do all 5, realising they are interconnected.  Doing 3 only would be a significant 
restructuring of timeline.   
  Concerns we still don’t have our stakeholder engagement sorted.  Also, the outputs haven’t been up to 
the level of quality expected. 
  Bharti to put options together for quality management to Board. Until this is agreed and in place, hesitant 
to embark on too much more.   
  Bharti has a draft paper on QA panel, one paper that explains what the system will look like, names of 
people who are happy to participate, panel of 2 or 3 people, what they will do.  Experts from academic 
and industry, contracted in on monthly basis.   
  Bharti to send paper on Quality Management System to Board by end of week.  (Action Register #142).  
 
Staff recruitment –  
   Recruiting takes up to 10 weeks by the time everything is done taking us to the end of the year.  
  General discussion on whether to get adverts out now, or embed what we have and get the structures in 
place first 
  It was agreed to advertise vacancies as soon as possible (Action Register #143).   
 
Challenges –  
  Other organisations are researching same topics, with similar deliverables.  Bharti has asked TEC for list of 
other programmes but has not had a response. 
  ConCOVE is navigating this space by collaborating, quite a lot of duplication.   
   It would be useful for ConCOVE to do a map of all projects currently underway – would be useful for 
industry as well as ConCOVE.  
  Should have been picked up in environment scans for each project.  The earlier this can be done, the 
better.  Need to see what everyone is doing, who they are, so we can understand ConCOVE restraints.   
  The Board subcommittee assisting with an engagement plan may help scope it up.   
  Our role is to identify the work that has been done, and then look for gaps.  Will find small items that will 
be significant in pulling it all together and making big step changes moving forward.  Collecting this 
information is critical.  (Action Register #144). 
  ConCOVE Communications Manager is currently on bereavement leave, has just returned to NZ and is in 
MIQ, Bharti is talking with him later today. 

    Bharti to work with the sub committee from the Board to ensure the ConCOVE engagement plan is 
completed satisfactorily. 
  Quality Management plan – Bharti to send to Board by Friday 15 October.  People to comment ASAP, 
approval by next week.   
  Discussion regarding whether we are going to continue with all projects while we don’t have Project Leads 
for them or concentrate on those we have Project Leads for? 
Outcome – put on Seek for a couple of weeks, if shortlist not acceptable, go to an agent.   
  It was agreed to concentrate on the four projects but keep research for diversity afloat like we are now. 
Until we are fully staffed we need to get the core parts of the business that are going to make it tick in the 
future, engagement plan is key to this, aligned to it is the QA system.   
  Bharti – engagement plan needs to be framed up, quality processes behind it, underpins all work.  Keeping 
the momentum going in diversity space is important.  (Action Register #145). 
  Graham – when meet with TEC we will need to update them that the diversity project will be slowed 
down, don’t have staff on board to kick off Career Framework, concentrating on 4 projects, one kicking 
over where consolidating base / core structures.  (Action Register #146). 
 
2.  Risk Register   
  General discussion about ongoing lack of credible engagement plan and reporting of engagement activity 
to the Board (Action Register #137).  Subcommittee from Board to work with Bharti to establish 
satisfactory engagement plan and monthly reporting: Honor, Nick, Pam, Craig.   
  Discussion about possible ConCOVE presentation to NZCIC  
  Amos still struggling with ecosystem.  Add Vertical Horizons and Kaianga Ora into engagement plan. 
Risk Register #9 –   
  We need to have an upfront conversation with TEC that Covid is affecting programme, don’t have staffing 
levels, down on budgeted expenditure, may need an extension past 5 years.  Also need to look at the 
effects Covid is having on our projects, do we need to change projects to make sure they are relevant, 
methodologies in the environment.   
  Opportunity to work with Te Pukenga and WDC and other parts of RoVE, how can ConCOVE add value to 
Vocational Education to react to Covid environment? 
  If we take on something else, how do we fund it, or take funding out of existing projects, or look at 
external projects.   
  By end of next week, meeting with Kim Ulberg, Martin, Graham, Phil, Bharti – frame up for Board approval 
first.  (Action Register #137).   
  Discussion regarding whether current Covid crisis demands our attention to pivot, possibly in Disruption 
project. 
  What is the best way of delivering Vocational Education through digital training during lockdowns?  
Businesses going back to work, solely focusing on staying viable.  Training is down quite a lot on their 
priorities.   
  Classroom learning will struggle when we can’t have people in classrooms.  Part of disruption project, or 
new project?  
  Disruption project is about forecasting trends and gaps. Changing to look at COVID disruption could 
require a new project or pausing current project..   
  Discuss with TEC whether ConCOVE can add value with specific COVID response. See Board Meeting notes 
column on Risk Register.   
 
7.  General Business  
Cultural Competency Training –  
  A Māori Advisory Group member has requested to join Cultural Competency training being delivered to 
ConCOVE staff by MIT.   
  General discussion about the need for cultural competence training for Advisory Group and Board 
members.   
  Bharti to provide cost of cultural competency training per person to the Board.  (Action Register #147).  
  Outcome – ConCOVE will offer cultural competence training to Advisory Group members and Board 
Members, at their discretion if they want to attend. (Action Register #148).   
Martin – Simplifying Vocational Qualifications Memo  
  WDC’s officially became regulatory authorities on Monday of last week, (except for 1)  

  WDCs will be approving new qualifications from February 2022.   
  Outcome of review of qualification framework is it is up to each WDC to decide on a case by case basis 
whether each qualification will be achieved by a national curriculum, or whether there can be multiple 
programmes that lead to that qualification.  This will have an impact on how we shape our guidance, for 
programmes or national curriculum. 
  Unit standards are disappearing as we know them.  Will be replaced by Skills Standards, like a Unit 
Standards, but bigger.    WDC’s will approve skills standards relevant to their qualification, where 
qualification is comprised of skills standards, providers will be obliged to use those skills standards.   
  Will take years to fully populate, but takes affect more or less, as of now.   Martin can send more info if 
interested.   
  Micro credentials are staying, they can be a qualification in their own right, or can contribute to 
attainment of qualification.  Public info is what is included in the reading material in the Board Papers.   
 
Tech Park award –  
  The Board congratulated MIT on Tech Park winning an Australasian Design Award Best Technical Training 
facility.  Paul Hollings, original MIT rep on the Board had a lot to do with the project.  Hats off to the team 
for a fantastic achievement. 
 
Board Risk Committee – 
  There are problems with lack of detail in financials reported to the Board. Options for improvement: 
o   Bharti to provide added detail in a slimmed down version of the board report added in the 
Annual Plan.   
o  Establish a risk committee that spends time with Bharti before each board meeting and reports 
back to board.   
Following discussion, it was decided the financials would be provided with added detail based on the template 
used for the Annual Report.   
Bharti to work with Graham and Nick to develop financial reporting template.  (Action Register #149). 
 
Logo –  
  The updated logo shared in the Board Papers was Approved.  (Decision Register #42). 
 
New ConCOVE Members –  
  Vanessa to email ConCOVE Members for approval. (Completed). 
 
Future online Board Meetings –  
  Future online Board Meetings will be scheduled for three hours from 9.00-12.00 
 
Invoicing –  
  Vanessa thanked the Board for their efforts with invoicing Board fees this month.  Went smoothly and 
appreciate the efforts.   
 
 
 

ConCOVE Board Action Register 
Item
Person 
Due Date
Status (In progress 
Responsible
or Closed)
< click on the filter button to untick closed so that the register will only show in progress items 
76 Offer roles for Project Leads.
Bharti
30-Apr-21
In progress
Update – Three project leads have started.  Still looking 
for Entry Project Lead and Diversity.  Job descriptions 
waiting to go out.
77 Offer roles for Researchers.
Bharti
12-May-21
In progress
Update – Four researchers have started.  Looking for 
Diversity.
88 Marketing person to work on grassroots level engagement Dom 
21-Jun-21
In progress
103 Map out when we feed back into WDC's so we can 
Dom 
30-Jun-21
In progress
communicate how we plan to translate research into 
action (feedback loop / flow chart).  Stakeholder 
engagement piece - how and when.  Update - will follow 
after Phil and Graham meet.  Update 13/10 - have met.  
Don’t see need to have WDC on our Board.  3 tiered 
understanding – Bharti doing a MoU.  Will need to run 
past TEC (funding condition was to have a WDC person on 
our Board).  Had meeting with DCE from Te Pukenga 
about how to engage – very positive.  Making progress.  
109 Share research methodology with the Board.
Researchers
30-Jun-21
In progress
Update - Each project will have its own method.  Share 
good common practices, but method needs to be fit for 
objectives of the project.  Be good to understand balance 
between industry / academic and have consistency.  
111 Bharti & HR talking about how to engage contractors - 
Bharti / HR
30-Jul-21
In progress
advertising or via firms 
112 Bharti to ask Kim Ulberg for list of TEC funded research.  
Bharti 
30-Jul-21
In progress
Update - have asked, waiting for reply.
115 Arrange for ConCOVE representation to be at upcoming 
Dom 
30-Jul-21
In progress
Trade Shows (touch base 3 - 4 months before they run)
121 Amos to connect Teresa with Ngai Tahu. 
Amos 
30-Jul-21
In progress
Update - introductions with Iwi are being done when 
personal connections, need a plan for connecting with Iwi, 
working with Maori Advisory Group.  Amos, Phil, Craig can 
come back to us on this to give advice and direction and 
come back to Bharti.  ConCOVE to write iwi engagement 
strategy and put together in a wider national plan.  
122 Project leads to get closer with Board Member project 
Project Leads
30-Jul-21
In progress
champions regarding strategies and objectives with 
projects.
Update - broaden now, invite the Board to have a debrief 
on focus areas.  Bharti to come back and present the flow 
of how we intend to do this going forward.  

123 If Board has ideas on how to connect with Project Leads,  Board
30-Jul-21
In progress
send to Graham and Phil, who will pass onto Bharti to give 
to Project Leads where appropriate.  
Create a criteria for decision making for ConCOVE 
Bharti
13-Oct-21 In progress
Members.  Bharti to contact other organisations 
127 about their criteria as a benchmark.
128 Give Anthony Butterworth a chance to respond.  
Co-Chairs
13-Oct-21 In progress
ConCOVE presents each Board Meeting about 
Project Leads
Ongoing
In progress
contacts – scope creep.  List of gaps in industry to be 
presented to the Board.  Can work with Board to 
potentially meet other gaps – seek Board feedback.
129
130 Ongoing review process of understanding the 
Project Leads
Ongoing
In progress
landscape on a quarterly basis and providing that 
feedback.  
Bharti to stay engaged with Katherine Hall – has a 
Bharti 
Ongoing
In progress
131 list of all projects to check for overlapping.  
ConCOVE email address to external people?  Bring 
Dom / Vanessa
5-Oct-21 In progress
up at next meeting. Dom to give feedback.  Get 
135 something from MIT IT. 
136 Update action due dates, focus on them.  Phil, Graham 
Phil, Graham, 
15-Nov-21
In progress
and Bharti to weed out and update before next meeting.
Bharti 
Require a stakeholder engagement report at every Board  Phil, Graham, 
15-Nov-21
In progress
Meeting.  Honor, Nick, Craig, Pam to assist with reporting  Bharti, Honor, 
137 format.
Nick, Craig, Pam 
138 Meeting with Kim Ulberg re Covid project.  To be framed  Bharti, Phil, 
22-Oct-21
In progress
up and sent to Board prior.  
Graham
Provide up to date stakeholder engagement summaries to  Dom 
15-Nov-21
In progress
139 the Board at end of Board Papers.
140 Provide Board with detail of implementation of surveys -  Bharti 
15-Nov-21
In progress
methodology, questions etc.
141 Share JD's of available positions with the Board
Bharti 
31-Oct-21
In progress
142 Bharti to provide Board with QA Paper 
Bharti 
15-Oct-21
In progress
143 Get available positions on Seek ASAP
Bharti 
21-Oct-21
In progress
144 Create map of work that all organisations are doing 
Phil, Graham, 
15-Nov-21
In progress
currently.  Honor, Nick, Craig, Pam to assist with scoping. Bharti, Honor, 
Nick, Craig, Pam 
Stakeholder Engagement plan needs to be framed up, 
Bharti, Dom
31-Oct-21
In progress
145 quality processes behind it.
146 Advise TEC the diversity project will be slowed down, 
Bharti, Graham,  31-Oct-21
In progress
don’t have staff on board to kick off Career Framework, 
Phil
concentrating on 4 projects, one kicking over where 
consolidating base / core structures.  
Bharti to provide Board with per person cost for Cultural  Bharti 
31-Oct-21
In progress
147 Competency Training 
148 Offer Cultural Competency Training to Board Members 
Bharti 
15-Nov-21
In progress
and Advisory Groups, if they wish to attend
Bharti to provide new financial reporting format.  Graham  Bharti, Graham,  31-Oct-21
In progress
and other Board Members to assist with creating new 
Phil
149 format.

ConCOVE Board Decision Register 
Item
Date
Made Via
Agreement that the Board needs to be very clear on the organisation’s 
10-Dec-20
Board meeting
mandate before engaging Advisory Groups
Annual and Financial Plan - Board confirmed approval of sections 1, 2b, 2c, 4 
10-Dec-20
Board meeting
and 5, subject to the changes discussed being added before submission.
Agreement to use the title ‘Project Lead’ vs ‘Project Manager’ going forward
10-Feb-21
Board meeting
Board Members to receive fixed payment per annum, rather than payment for  11-Mar-21
Board meeting
services
Mission Statement and Vision to be bi-lingual 
11-Mar-21
Board meeting
Risk Regiser - remove risks that are part of ConCOVE Operational cycle and just  11-Mar-21
Board meeting
leave Board risks in there.  
Replace title - 'Director' now 'General Manager'
11-Mar-21
Board meeting
Will trial Teams for Board use, as long as Teams can be kept secure from 
11-Mar-21
Board meeting
operations
Six researchers is fine for now, to be reviewed in middle of 2021
11-Mar-21
Board meeting
10 Group vs individual applicants for Project Leads - keep an open mind about all  11-Mar-21
Board meeting
applications
11 Women's Advisory Group - to include people who identify as Women, or non-
11-Mar-21
Board meeting
binary
12 Board Members can attend Advisory Group meetings as an advocate or 
11-Mar-21
Board meeting
ambassador, but do not need to be at every meeting
13 Create Action list and Board Decision Registers
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
14 Advisory Groups will have 12 members. 
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
15 Advisory Groups - members limited to one group per person.  
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
16 Advisory Groups - members must represent the demographic of the group they  8-Apr-21
Board meeting
are in
17 Advisory Group member criteria - Maori and Pasifika - must be range of ages, 
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
mix of gender, have geographical spread, different industries and a cross 
18 section
Advis  o
ory f experie
 Group  nce.
member criteria - Women - a range of ages and ethnicities, 
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
geographical spread, different industries, cross section of experience.  
19 "Disruption" project title passed
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
20 "Entry" project title passed
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
21 "Productivity" project title rejected.  Vote to change to "Career Progression" 
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
passed.
22 "Diversity" project title passed
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
23 "Sustainability" project title passed
8-Apr-21
Board meeting
24 "Sustainability" benefits passed
8-Apr-21
Board meeting

ConCOVE Board Decision Register 
25 Charter document approved and passed
9-Apr-21
Board group email
26 Women's Advisory Group - 12 members selected, group formed
16-Apr-21
Board group email
27 ConCOVE Member accepted - Paul Merson 
16-Apr-21
Board group email
28 ConCOVE Member accepted - Doug Leef 
29-Apr-21
Board group email
29 ConCOVE Members accepted - Andrew Cowan, Jacqui Neilson, Bruce 
5-May-21
Board group email
Whittaker, Mike Grumball
30 Maori Advisory Group - 10 members selected, group formed
5-May-21
Board group email
31 Proverb agreed on - "The role of the skilled (pūkenga) wayfinder is to know the  5-May-21
Board group email
start, envision the destination and chart the journey."
32 ConCOVE Members accepted - Simon Carroll,  Harp Davenport, Isaac Liava'a, 
12-May-21
Board meeting
Kieren, Matthew Fiso, Sadegh Aliakbarlou, Teresa Poli
33 Pasifika Advisory Group - 7 members approved, yet to make a decision 
12-May-21
Board meeting
regarding Mark.
34 Mark Talanoa approved as a Pasifika Advisory Group Member
25-May-21
Board group email
35 ConCOVE Members accepted - Maurice Ridler, Wayne Kohi, Andrew Olsen, 
27-May-21
Board group email
Adrienne Miller, Ian Chamberlain, Ian Satherley, Megan Darby, Craven Wetere, 
TJ Daly
36 Change to diversity project description - "Identify and understand the barriers  1-Jun-21
Board group email
for the diverse range of people entering …"
37 ConCOVE Members accepted - Michelle Miranda, Pete Sleeman, Joanne Verry,  16-Jun-21
Board group email
Michael Braggins, Adrienne Miller, Joseph Rosendaal, Darren Stanton, Andrew 
Donohue, Stuart Hindley, David O'Connor, Jay Vaai, Manu Palelei, Mahrukh 
Khan, Mani Saini, Mark Talanoa, Graham Burke, Vanessa Veart-Smith, Vanessa 
Nash, Saia Finau Latu, Dennis Keys, Wendy Baker, Nigel Sun, Sue Brotherton, 
Theresa Rongonui, Pauline Sutton, Liz Watson, Claire Johnson, Minas 
Liarokapis, Wayne Maynard, Kingsley Hannah, Linda Aumua, Saba Shaffakat, 
Travis Timoko, Marion Nieuwland, Dave Watson, Terri-Ann Berry, Katherine 
Hall, Courtenay Hurt-Suwan, Sarah Toase, Tash Nansen, Terekino Vaireka, 
James MacKay
38 Change Disruption project title to 'Disruptive Technology' -  vote occurred, no  16-Jun-21
Board meeting
change. To remain as 'Disruption'.  
39 ‘Tuhura: Concove - The next generation of construction education.’ - Maori 
21-Jul-21
Board group email
name for ConCOVE approved by the Board.
40 ConCOVE Members accepted - Danny Reily, Robert de Roo, Carl Rankin, 
31-Aug-21
Board group email
Norman Kete, Craig Thorne, Robbie Paul, Liletina Vaka, Paul Hallahan, Ruth 
Berry, Andrew McNaught, Steve Kennedy, Dani Mao, Gary Whittaker, Zeno 
Park
41 Option B for ConCOVE Tuhura Logo voted in.
15-Sep-21
Board meeting
42 Final ConCOVE Tuhura logo approved.
13-Oct-21
Board meeting
43
44

Name of CoVE
Co :
nCOVE
Name of Lead T
MIT
EO:
Report:
ConCOVE Risk Register
Date:
13.10.21
Description of 
Risk Management 
Potential cause(s) of 
Level of Risk 
risk 
Consequence
Level of Risk 
Approach 
the risk 
Likelihood
Level of Risk
(post Risk 
Person 
Risk 
No.  ["Risk of … 
Risk Type
s
acceptable to 
[What is being done 
Timeframe 
Comments from Board Meeting
[What could cause the 
(Currently)
(Currently) 
Management 
Responsible
Status
resulting in …… 
(Currently)
Board
to manage the 
risk to occur?]
action)
"]
risk?]
Risk of 
Roles going out on 
inadequate 
seek, reaching out to 
industry contacts and 
Project Lead 
resource to 
Operational 
Delay in recruitment 
recruitment team.  
General 
13/10 - Still short two project leads - potentially 3 (Career Framework).  Keeping these two 
6
Moderate
Possible
Medium
High
Interim - tony doing 
Medium
28-Feb-21
Open
positions on hold under other 3 are bedded down?  Bharti doing Lit Review for Diversity to 
undertake 
Capability
process
Manager
entry.  Board and 
progress it and meet timelines.  Graham feels strongly we focus on current projects?  
required work 
Advisory Group to 
in March/April 
assist recommending 
people.  
2021
Risk of  
Reduce - a) Task 
stakeholders 
Board Members to 
engage with 
13/10 - While still recruiting and projects learning – converting interest into action in projects.  
not being 
Leave at high until people are firmly engaged.  Bharti - should be resolved in 3 months. Roles 
stakeholders, b) 
engaged, 
Poor awareness of 
Board Co-
going out on seek, reaching out to industry contacts and recruitment team.  Interim - Tony doing 
implement the Stkhldr 
resulting in 
ConCOVE in 
entry.  Board and Advisory Group to assist recommending people.  13/10 update - engagement 
Engmt/Comms Plan.  
chairs, 
with South Island, need to start adapting, great to have plans in place about how we will engage 
poor 
construction and 
Need descriptions of 
Board 
should the North continue to be disconnected.  Alternative engagement approaches needed. Pivot 
8
Reputational
Major
Likely
Low
High
Medium
Open
Open
participation in 
education sectors
projects, FAQ's, 
Members, 
to digital.  Stakeholder reporting - each month, who has Bharti been engaging with.  Overview.  
Doesn't just sit with Bharti - engagement around projects we have stood up, wider network that 
ConCOVE 
Low interest in 
talking points, how we 
General 
fit in with WDC etc 
needs to be engaged rather than just Advisory Groups.  Ensure those connections into projects 
projects and 
ConCOVE's mandate
Manager
are being fostered by Bharti or actively sought by Project Leads.  Need a decent stakeholder 
urgently.  After scope 
engagement plan / map.  Need overarching plan, and each project plan.  Join a CIC meeting?  
poor support of 
reset with Martin, 
Join with Vertical Horizons. 
ConCOVE in 
Bharti will advise plan 
general
to the Board.  

13/10 - Need to up game on online engagement.  Avoid being on radars for extension of timeframe due to Covid.  
Develop an action plan for how we are going to work through this.  Impacts on design of projects themselves, 
particularly diversity project - industries need to learn how to live / work under restrictions, will have an impact on 
priority groups.  Disruption project - should we be looking at urgently investigating how VE can pivot to meet 
needs of industry in Covid environment?  TEC purpose for CoVES - second point is 'how education is delivered' - 
perfect opportunity to do prototyping in this space?  As much as it relates to training, can't think of why this isn't 
in our scope.  Find a value adding niche.  Redesign projects to factor Covid in. A lot of engagements cancelled 
because people are too busy, training could be paused for some time.  A lot of work about digitial online learning - 
Risk of another 
Accept - remote 
could leverage off this.  If we can analyse whole ecosystem in NZ for online learning capability, look at collab at 
what was a silo'd industry into best practice.  Join the dots and make recommendations to industry ASAP, if 
COVID-19 
working, central 
acceptable to TEC and funding.  Covid is not going to go away.  On job learning may suffer due to businesses 
database.  
needing to do what they have to, to stay viable.  Focus 5 - 10 years out changing before our eyes.  Response to 
lockdown, 
Everyone working 
Covid - accelerate and challenge what we consider to be priorities, what is important for business at this time in 
resulting in 
really well 
the workstream.  Engagement piece will guide us.  Where are they hurting, what is it we can participate in? 
What is industry telling us they are going to do about this, how does ConCOVE partner and function as leaders 
difficulties for 
transitioning in and 
General 
in this disrupted space?  Action - change of focus in distruption project.  Comms with TEC if agree this is our 
the General 
Operational 
Community 
Almost 
out of office, working 
Manager
9
Minor
Low
High
Low
Ongoing
Open
strategy, a strategic plan to focus on Covid and challenges currently facing.  Next step - small group of Board to 
Managerate and Capability
transmission
Certain
from home.  Board 
Board Co-
sit with Te Pukenga and TEC, 5 projects originally designed, Covid is a disruption we need to pivot towards, can 
Meetings online.  We 
you work with us to redesign the projects to properly face this, without overlapping.  Forecast extension of time.  
Board to work 
Chairs
Action - Phil, Graham, Martin, Bharti to go to TEC in first instance.  Frame up better and share with Board 
haven’t been doing 
before going to TEC.  Quite a change of direction - how does it affect current work done in the distruption project 
together in-
national consultations 
to pivot towards Covid outcomes that will benefit industry? Current outcomes still relevant.  Instead of a 
person, and 
to date – this will test 
redeployment, make sure context and lens of Covid is brought into the project - visibly address it.  Relevance of 
Covid be present in all projects.  Building resilience into projects to deal with a changing environment.  All 
with the 
the way we work, and 
projects still have validity, align with view we should talk to clients about whether Covid itself creates a new and 
stakeholders.  
this risk.  
immediate project to be helpful in this space.  Already groups doing this - ConCOVE could help?  Strategically 
position ourselves as a resource for the sector that can pivot at short notice as needs require.  Action - Talk to 
TEC immediately, talk to key clients and go from there. Faciliatation and filling gaps.  May need to think about 
what projects we divest - budget was to be used on the 5 projects, if divert to doing something here and now, 
what other projects do we pair back or cut, drop or delay, or go to an external funding source - TEC? Funding 
agreement, section in there 'what other funding we have taken on' - we are able to go over and above what we 
have agreed to do with TEC, as long as we deliver what we have agreed to TEC.  Can't commercialise as we 
don't own IP.  Can be from government or private.We aren't on track with current 5 projects, can we deliver 
another one?
Reduce - Board, 
General Managerate, 
PM's and Advisory 
Groups being 
provided very clear 
verbal and written 
information on the 
Risk that scope 
Board not being 
scope of ConCOVE's 
of ConCOVE's 
clear on scope
mandate and each of 
Concern that we focus too closely on thing and miss bigger 
mandate 
General Managerate 
the projects 
Co-Chairs,
context.  Will take time to have confidence in.  Will be here 
creeps, 
not being clear on 
Schedule updates 
Operational 
with these groups to 
General 
for a year.  What is mandate creep?  As we have been 
16 resulting in un-
scope
Major
Likely
Medium
Medium
Low
Ongoing
Open
Capability
remind them of the 
Manager, 
defining and redefining projects, trying to capture what we 
focussed work 
Project Managers not 
original scope to.  
MIT Host
need to.  Actually being effective, need to deliver tangible 
and 
being clear on scope
Minimise / correct 
products at end.  
compromised 
Advisory Groups not 
deviation.  Plan 
outcomes
being clear on scope
forward to do a six 
monthly scope check.  
Service vs project 
lead – mitigate with 
being transparent 
with Board.  Work 
with Martin to rescope 
it working well.  

Risk that 
Reduce - Ensure 
ConCOVE is 
Comms activity 
seen as being 
reinforces the 
'academic' 
organisation's 
Industry having a 
mandate and 
rather than 
pre-conceived idea 
emphasises Board and 
17 'industry' 
Reputational
Major
Possible
Low
Medium
Low
1-Jan-23 General Manager
Open
that this will be an 
staff industry 
focussed, 
academic exercise
credentials/ 
making 
experience
industry 
Our point of difference 
is our projects are 
engagement 
industry lead.  
more difficult
Risk that 
Reduce - Ensure 
ConCOVE is 
ConCOVE's office  
Comms activity 
perceived as 
being physically 
reinforces the 
organisation's 
being Auckland 
based in Auckland
nationwide mandate 
or Wellington-
ConCOVE General 
and schedule industry 
centric, 
Managerate staff 
activity across the 
18
Reputational
Minor
Possible
Low
Medium
Low
1-Jan-23 General Manager
Open
resulting in 
being Auckland-
country.  Project leads 
difficulty 
based
being advertised 
across New Zealand.  
securing 
Alternate Board 
Bharti and Project 
nationwide 
meetings based in 
Leads moving into 
industry 
Auckland
South Island with 
engagement.
engagement
Risk of not 
being able to 
clearly identify 
potential  
Learners, 
Operational 
No existing database 
Reduce - seek active 
19
Moderate
Possible
Low
Medium
input from industry, 
Low
1-Jul-21 General Manager
Open
making it 
Capability
available
schools, MBIE, MSD
difficult to 
include them in 
our Stakeholder 
engagement

Reduce - Work with 
MIT's data security 
policy and protocols
Risk of data 
Deliver strong training 
security being 
for all ConCOVE staff 
compromised 
Poor security 
who will be working 
and information 
protocols in place
with data.  Privacy 
20
Reputational
Major
Possible
Low
Low
Low
Ongoing General Manager
Open
given on the 
Poor training of staff 
laws updated, need a 
condition of 
working with data
policy / systems / 
protocols in place 
anonymity is 
(items from MIT 
released
automatically).  Add 
password to database 
file. 
Reduce - Ensure 
ConCOVE's office 
Comms activity 
Board Co-
being physically 
reinforces the 
Risk of 
Chairs, 
based on an MIT 
organisation's 
ConCOVE being 
mandate and 
Board 
21
Reputational
campus; Bid led by 
Minor
Possible
Low
Medium
Low
1-Jan-23
Open
seen as MIT-
independence.  MIT 
Members, 
MIT, MIT email 
hosting us is an 
centric
General 
addresses, MIT 
opportunity - risk still 
Manager
systems & resources
exists until ConCOVE 
is more visible.
Risk that 
ConCOVE 
Project milestones 
doesn't deliver 
are missed
Reduce - Strong 
General 
22
Reputational
Moderate
Possible
Low
Medium
project management 
Low
Ongoing
Open
the outcomes 
Stakeholder comms 
Manager
and strong SE comms
by the dates 
are not kept current
that it said it 
Reduce - Strong 
Not doing a full 
environmental scan at 
'environmental scan' 
the start of each 
Risk of 
prior to commencing 
project
Operational 
Still high as we are early in projects.  13/10 - on top of this.  Katherine Hall set up, keep on top of 
Strong SE with other 
General 
23 replicating the 
project
Minor
Possible
Low
High
Low
Ongoing
Open
it.  Opportunity to partner, rather than duplication.  Identify what other projects are being done. 
Capability
players around 
Manager
work of others
Not engaging with 
Central Government. Amos and Graham to discuss after.
possible co-design.  
other players in 
Diversity Worx project 
collaborative manner
an issue.  Meeting 
planned to discuss.  
Reduce - plan and 
Risk that 
deliver regular comms 
ConCOVE 
Poor SE comms 
to Members and 
Members don't 
provide opps for 
24
Reputational
leading to low 
Moderate
Possible
Low
Medium
Low
Ongoing
General Manager
Open
feel they get 
input.  Need a plan 
engagement
keeping members 
'value' out of 
engaged from 
belonging
industry perspective.  
Poor understanding 
Risk that the 
and/or poor 
Advisory 
communication of 
Operational 
General 
25 Groups are 
the roles of the 
Moderate
Possible
Low
Medium
Low
1-Jun-21
Open
Capability
Manager
unclear on their 
groups by the 
mandate
General Manager or 
Board

Risk that we 
may not be 
seen as diverse 
Lack of female 
Have Teresa as a 
General 
27
Reputational
Moderate
Possible
Low
Medium
Low
1-Jun-21
Open
Pam advised to leave this 
with all male 
applicants 
project lead now.
Manager
Project Leads to 
date.
Reputational 
risk exists for 
all ConCOVE 
Staff, Board 
Lack of female 
Board Co-
28 Members, 
Reputational
Moderate
Possible
Low
Low
Low
Ongoing
Open
applicants 
Chairs 
Members and 
Advisory Group 
Members in 
their behaviour


 
ConCOVE Board Members – 
Conflict of Interest Register  

Updated 13.10.21 
 
Conflict  Date 
Board 
Conflict 
of  Details 
Number  Conflict 
Member  
Interest 
Noted  
3.  
17.5.21 
Phil 
Toitu 
Toitu Tairahiti Housing Limited Project.  Iwi – 
Hokianga   Tairahiti 
Government giving them $200m to build 500 
Housing 
whare different Iwi locations.  Waikato - $4B.  
Limited  
Inland port at Ngaruawahia.