45 Pipitea Street
Wellington
26 May 2023
Phone 0800 25 78 87
dia.govt.nz
Micky Turner
[FYI request #19992 email]
Tēnā koe Micky
Your request for information, reference OIA2223-0064
Thank you for your email of 22 July 2022 to the Department of Internal Affairs (the
Department), requesting the following information under the Official Information Act 1982
(the Act):
“1. Al written communication between DIA & Deloitte regarding Three Waters.
Of particular interest is communication regarding this report:
https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/Three-waters-reform-
programme/$file/deloitte-report-industry-development-study-&-economic-
impact-assessment.pdf”
On 5 August 2022, you refined your request to be for the fol owing;
“All written communication, between DIA & Deloitte regarding the fol owing
report; https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/Three-waters-reform-
programme/$file/deloitte-report-industry-development-study-&-economic-
impact-assessment.pdf”
On 2 September 2022 we extended the time to respond to your request by 20
working days to 30 September 2022, under section 15A(1)(b) of the Act.
On 3 October 2022, we advised you that under section 15(1) of the Act the decision
had been made to grant your request. We advised that a formal response would be
provided to you on or before 14 November 2022 and, in accordance with section
16(e) of the Act, it would contain a summary of the correspondence you had
requested.
On 12 December 2022, after further evaluation of your request, we decided that the
initial decision that was communicated to you on 3 October 2022 was not sufficient
to satisfy your request and that a response including the correspondence between
the Department and Deloitte was required.
We again apologise for the unacceptable delay in your request being responded to
fully.
In our letter of 12 December 2022, we set out a timeline of events relating to
correspondence between Deloitte and the Department. Taking that timeline, we
have interpreted your request to be for information from when Deloitte commenced
work on the
Industry Development Study & Economic Impact Assessment report
(Deloitte Report) until when the report was completed.
Te Tari Taiwhenua
Department of Internal Affairs
We have identified more than 300 emails (with attachments) in scope of the request.
As advised, we are releasing these emails to you in tranches. Attached is Tranche One
which includes correspondence and draft materials that were exchanged during the
initial commissioning and set-up of the work. The focus during this phase of the
process was to ensure access to the appropriate input information for the model and
to agree key assumptions and parameters for the modelling, along with agreeing the
lines of inquiry for the industry study and stakeholders to be interviewed. The model
parameters and assumptions represent initial starting points that would then be
confirmed or recalibrated as required to ensure the initial model results were
consistent with insights gleaned from industry representatives through the industry
study that Deloitte were undertaking in parallel.
In Tranche One, please find the first of four parts of the requested information. As
detailed in the attached
Appendix A and throughout al the email correspondence, it
has been necessary to withhold information under the fol owing sections of the Act:
• Section 9(2)(a) –
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased
natural persons,
• Section 9(2)(b)(ii) –
to protect information where the making available of the information
would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who
supplied or who is the subject of the information,
• Section 9(2)(ba)(i) –
to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence
or any person has been or could be compel ed to provide under the authority of any
enactment, where making available of the information would likely to prejudice the supply
of similar information, or information from the same source, and it is the public interest that
such information should continue to be supplied; and
In accordance with section 9(1) of the Act, we do not consider the withholding of
information is outweighed by other considerations which render it desirable, in the
public interest, to make that information available.
We are currently working on finalising our decision on Tranche Two and anticipate
releasing this to you on or before 9 June 2023.
You have the right, under section 28(3) of the Act, to make a complaint to an
Ombudsman and seek an investigation and review of my decision on your request.
The contact address is: Office of the Ombudsman, PO Box 10152, Wel ington 6143.
Alternatively, you can phone 0800 802 602 or email
[email address].
Nāku noa, nā
Rashad Saeedi
Manager, Ministerial Services
Waters Services Reform Programme
Appendix A - Tranche One Attachments
Page or pages
Attachment Title
(R)elease, (P)artial
Withholding Grounds applied
in which the
release or
under the Official
document is
(W)ithhold in full
Information Act 1982
located or
mentioned as
attachment
3 – 6
Copies of Region and Sector (database)
R
-
7 – 8
Economic Impact - Initiation
R
-
11 – 13
DIA Three Waters Discussion Points
R
-
39 - 44
Affected Industries Workstreams (002) -
R
-
February 2021
45
DIA CSO – Deloitte v2
W
s 9(2)(b)(ii)
47
DIA Contracts
W
s 9(2)(b)(ii)
49
DIA Contacts
P
S 9(2)(a)
54 – 55
Deloitte – Three Waters Status Update
R
-
150221
56
Three Waters Economic Impact Workshop
W
S 9(2)(ba)(i)
73 – 74
Deloitte – Three Waters Status Update
R
-
190221
Section 9(2)(a) –
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural
persons,
Section 9(2)(b)(ii) –
to protect information where the making available of the information
would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who
supplied or who is the subject of the information,
Section 9(2)(ba)(i) –
to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or
any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of any enactment,
where making available of the information would likely to prejudice the supply of similar
information, or information from the same source, and it is the public interest that such
information should continue to be supplied;
Page 1 of 1
Document Outline
