This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Responsibilities under the Convention on Cluster Munitions'.


 
 
New Zealand Ministry of 
 
Foreign Affairs and Trade 
Manatū Aorere   
 
16 December 2024 
195 Lambton Quay 
Private Bag 18−901 
 
Wellington 6160 
 
New Zealand 
 
Andrew Ecclestone 
T    +64 4 439 8000 
[FYI request #28391 email] 
F    +64 4 472 9596 
 
 
OIA 29681 
 
Tēnā koe Andrew Ecclestone  
 
We refer to your email of 13 September 2024 in which you request the following under the 
Official Information Act 1982 (OIA): 
 
On 22 December 2009 New Zealand ratified the Convention on Cluster Munitions 
(https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVI-
6&chapter=26&clang=_en)  
 
State parties to the Convention expressed the views that they were, "Deeply 
concerned that civilian populations and individual civilians continue to bear the brunt 
of armed conflict, Determined to put an end for all time to the to the suffering and 
casualties caused by cluster munitions a the time of their use, when they fail to 
function as intended or when they are abandoned, Concerned that cluster munition 
remnants kill or maim civilians, including women and children, obstruct economic 
and social development, including through the loss of livelihood, impede post-conflict 
rehabilitation and reconstruction, delay or prevent the return of refugees and 
internally displaced persons, can negatively impact on national and international 
peace-building and humanitarian assistance efforts, and have other severe 
consequences that can persist for many years after use." 
 
Article 1(c) of the Convention states that each party to the Conventions "undertakes 
never under any circumstances to...assist, encourage or induce anyone to engage in 
any activity prohibited to a State Party under this Convention. 
 
Article 21 of the Convention states (inter alia): 
"1. Each State Party shall encourage States not party to this Convention to ratify, 
accept, approve or accede to this Convention, with the goal of attracting the 
adherence of all States to this Convention. 
2. Each State Party shall notify the governments of all States not party to this 
Convention, referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, of its obligations under this 
Convention, shall promote the norms it establishes and shall make its best efforts to 
discourage States not party to this Convention from using cluster munitions. 
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1 of this Convention and in accordance 
with international law, States Parties, their military personnel or nationals, may 
engage in military cooperation and operations with States not party to this 
Convention that might engage in activities prohibited to a State Party." 
 

e   [MFAT request email]  
w   www.mfat.govt.nz 

 
Page 2 of 9
 
 
On 10 September 2024, New Zealand's Deputy Permanent Representative to the 
Conference on Disarmament in Geneva made a statement to the 12th Meeting of 
States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions 
(https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/media-and-resources/convention-on-cluster-
munitions-12th-meeting-of-states-parties-new-zealand-general-statement). 
 
This noted the use of cluster munitions in Ukraine, and that "The United States has 
transferred cluster weapons of various kinds from its own stockpile to Ukraine. These 
actions will have economic, social, and environmental consequences for years to 
come, including in hampering recovery efforts in places where they have been used." 
 
It has been reported that both Russia and Ukraine have been using cluster munitions 
during their armed conflict. 
 
Please provide me with the following information: 
 

1.  The dates on which New Zealand, pursuant to Article 21(2), notified the governments 
of Russia, Belarus, Iran, Ukraine and the United States of its obligations under the 
Convention on Cluster Munitions. 

2.  The dates on which New Zealand, pursuant to Article 21(2), communicated to the 
governments of Russia, Belarus, Iran, Ukraine and the United States in accordance 
with its obligation to "make best efforts to discourage States not party to this 
Convention from using cluster munitions." 

3.  Copies of all communications falling within 1 and 2 above, and the replies received. 
4.  The dates since October 2020 on which legal advice was requested on what New 

Zealand needed to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster 
Munitions. 

5.  Copies of all requests since October 2020 for legal advice on what New Zealand 
needed to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. 
6.  The dates since October 2020 on which legal advice was provided on what New 
Zealand needed to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster 
Munitions. 

7.  Copies of all legal advice provided since October 2020 on what New Zealand needed 
to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. 
8.  The dates on which, since October 2020, advice has been provided to the Ministers of 
(a) Disarmament and Arms Control and (b) Foreign Affairs that relate to the 
Convention on Cluster Munitions and New Zealand's obligations under that 
Convention with regard to the conflict in Ukraine. 

9.  Copies of all advice since October 2020 to the Ministers of (a) Disarmament and 
Arms Control and (b) Foreign Affairs that relate to the Convention on Cluster 
Munitions and New Zealand's obligations under that Convention with regard to the 
conflict in Ukraine. 

10. The dates of all meetings and correspondence with the Ministry of Defence since 
October 2020 that relate to the Convention on Cluster Munitions and New Zealand's 
obligations under that Convention with regard to the conflict in Ukraine. 

11. Copies of all meetings notes and correspondence with the Ministry of Defence since 
October 2020 that relate to the Convention on Cluster Munitions and New Zealand's 
obligations under that Convention with regard to the conflict in Ukraine. 

12. The dates, since October 2020, of any meetings or correspondence any MFAT official 
has had with any member or representative of the government of the United 

 
Page 3 of 9
 
 
Kingdom that included mention of either country's obligations under the Convention 
on Cluster Munitions. 

13. The dates, since October 2020, of any meetings or correspondence any New Zealand 
government minister has had with any member or representative of the government 
of the United Kingdom that included mention of either country's obligations under the 
Convention on Cluster Munitions. 
 
Under section 16 of the Official Information Act, my preferences are (a) to receive a 
copy of the whole of each document (b) that the information is disclosed in a text 
searchable format, either Word or PDF, (c) that it does not have a watermark of 
‘Released under the Official Information Act’ or similar across the text and (d) that it 
is sent to the email address from which the Ministry received this request. 
 
If the Ministry decides that there is 'good reason' under the OIA to withhold any of 
the information I am requesting, then under section 19(a)(ii) of the OIA, I further 
request that the Ministry provide me with the grounds in support of each withholding 
reason cited for refusal and the public interest factors favouring disclosure that the 
Ministry considered.
 
 
On 24 September 2024, we contacted you seeking to refine your request to: 
 
  All timeframes are from 1 October 2020 to 13 September 2024. 
1-  Communications between Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) officials 
and the governments of Russia, Belarus, Iran, Ukraine and the United States 
relating to New Zealand’s obligations under Article 21(2) of the Convention on 
Cluster Munitions; 

2-  Legal advice produced by MFAT relating to New Zealand’s obligations under 
Article 21(2) of the Convention on Cluster Munitions;   
3-  Formal advice to Ministers produced by MFAT relating to New Zealand's 
obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions with regard to the 
conflict in Ukraine; 

4-  Formal meeting notes and correspondence between MFAT and the Ministry of 
Defence that relate to New Zealand's obligations under the Convention on 
Cluster Munitions with regard to the conflict in Ukraine;  
5-  The dates of formal and planned meetings between New Zealand based MFAT 
officials and British High Commission representatives to New Zealand where the 
Convention on Cluster Munitions was a named agenda item.  
 
On 30 September 2024, you declined this refinement. On 10 October 2024, the 
timeframes for responding to your request were extended by an additional 45 working 
days because responding to your request necessitated the review of a large quantity of 
information, and due to the consultations necessary to make a decision on your request 
(section 15A(1) of the OIA refers). 
 
Your request has been broken down into 5 sections to aid in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 
and Trade’s (the Ministry) response: 
 
Section 1: 
1)  The dates on which New Zealand, pursuant to Article 21(2), notified the 
governments of Russia, Belarus, Iran, Ukraine and the United States of its 
obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. 

2)  The dates on which New Zealand, pursuant to Article 21(2), communicated to the 
governments of Russia, Belarus, Iran, Ukraine and the United States in accordance 

 
Page 4 of 9
 
 
with its obligation to "make best efforts to discourage States not party to this 
Convention from using cluster munitions." 
3)  Copies of all communications falling within 1 and 2 above, and the replies received. 
 
Please refer to pages 1-5 of the collated docs. We have withheld some information under 
the following sections of the OIA: 
 
6(a): to avoid prejudicing the security or defence of New Zealand or the international 
relations of the New Zealand Government;  
 
6(b)(i): to protect the passing of information from another government on a 
confidential basis; 
 
6(b)(ii): to protect the passing of information from an international organisation on a 
confidential basis; and 
 
9(2)(g)(i): to protect the free and frank expression of opinions by departments. 
 
In addition to the dates mentioned in the collated docs there is a recollection of this topic 
being raised with the government of United States of America in December 2022. There is 
no formal record of this interaction. 
 
Information on New Zealand’s statements at the Convention on Cluster Munitions Meeting 
of States Parties and Oral Questions to the former Minister of Foreign Affairs are refused 
under section 18(d) of the OIA, as the information is publicly available via the following 
links: 
 
 
Golriz Ghahraman’s 27 July 2023 oral parliamentary question to Hon Nanaia Mahuta 
relating to the ban on cluster munitions: 
www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-
debates/rhr/document/HansS_20230727_050760000/4-question-no-4-foreign-affairs  
 
 
New Zealand's statements at Convention on Cluster Munitions Meetings: 
2020 – www.clusterconvention.org/files/meetings/9msp/New-Zealand-
Universalization-1.pdf  
2021 – www.clusterconvention.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/New-Zealand-CCM-
2RC-general-statement-Item-7.pdf  
2022 – www.clusterconvention.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/CCM-10MSP-New-
Zealand-Statement-Aug-2022.pdf  
2023 – www.clusterconvention.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/New-Zealand-
National-Statement-CCM-MSP-11-September-2023.pdf  
2024 – www.clusterconvention.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/New-Zealand-
statement-CCM-12MSP-10-September-2024.pdf  
 
The Ministry can also confirm that the New Zealand Government has notified the 
government of Ukraine of our obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. This 
correspondence is withheld in full under the following sections of the OIA: 
 
6(a): to avoid prejudicing the security or defence of New Zealand or the international 
relations of the New Zealand Government; and 
 
6(b)(i): to protect the passing of information from another government on a 
confidential basis. 
 

 
Page 5 of 9
 
 
We have not directly contacted the governments of Russia, Belarus, or Iran to outline 
New Zealand obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. All UN Member States 
were notified of New Zealand’s ratification of the Convention on 22 December 2009, via 
the United Nations Secretary-General. 
 
Section 2: 
4)  The dates since October 2020 on which legal advice was requested on what New 
Zealand needed to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster 
Munitions. 

5)  Copies of all requests since October 2020 for legal advice on what New Zealand 
needed to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. 
6)  The dates since October 2020 on which legal advice was provided on what New 
Zealand needed to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster 
Munitions. 
7)  Copies of all legal advice provided since October 2020 on what New Zealand 
needed to do to meet its obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. 
 
Between the dates of 1 October 2020 to the date of your request, the Ministry requested 
internal legal advice, related to what New Zealand needed in order to meet its obligations 
under the Convention on Cluster Munitions, one time. This advice is withheld in full under 
section 9(2)(h) of the OIA, to maintain legal professional privilege. We confirm that the 
Ministry’s International Security and Disarmament Division sought legal advice on 
23 November 2023 and received this advice on 27 November 2023.  
 
Section 3: 
8)  The dates on which, since October 2020, advice has been provided to the Ministers 
of (a) Disarmament and Arms Control and (b) Foreign Affairs that relate to the 
Convention on Cluster Munitions and New Zealand's obligations under that 

Convention with regard to the conflict in Ukraine. 
9)  Copies of all advice since October 2020 to the Ministers of (a) Disarmament and 
Arms Control and (b) Foreign Affairs that relate to the Convention on Cluster 
Munitions and New Zealand's obligations under that Convention with regard to the 

conflict in Ukraine. 
 
Please refer to pages 6-56 of the collated docs. Some information is under the following 
sections of the OIA: 
 
6(a): to avoid prejudicing the security or defence of New Zealand or the international 
relations of the New Zealand Government;  
 
6(b)(i): to protect the passing of information from another government on a 
confidential basis; 
 
6(b)(ii): to protect the passing of information from an international organisation on a 
confidential basis;  
 
9(2)(a): to protect individuals’ privacy;  
 
9(2)(f)(iv): to protect the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown 
and officials; and 
 
9(2)(g)(i): to protect the free and frank expression of opinions by departments. 
 
Where the information has been withheld under section 9 of the OIA, we identified no 
public interest in releasing the information that would override the reasons for withholding 
it. 

 
Page 6 of 9
 
 
In response to your questions for the dates of these communications, this information is 
largely contained within the documents provided. The additional dates are provided below: 
-  The document, INWARDS VISIT BY US SECRETARY OF STATE ANTONY BLINKEN 26 
– 27 JULY 2023, located on page 17-23, was supplied to the Minister of Foreign 
Affairs on 20 July 2023, and 
-  The supplementary question, Did the Minister raise the US’ provision of cluster 
munitions to Ukraine with Secretary Blinken?, located on page 25, was supplied to 
the Minister of Foreign Affairs on 27 July 2023. 
 
Section 4: 
10) The dates of all meetings and correspondence with the Ministry of Defence since 
October 2020 that relate to the Convention on Cluster Munitions and New Zealand's 
obligations under that Convention with regard to the conflict in Ukraine. 

11) Copies of all meetings notes and correspondence with the Ministry of Defence since 
October 2020 that relate to the Convention on Cluster Munitions and New Zealand's 
obligations under that Convention with regard to the conflict in Ukraine. 

 
Please refer to pages 28-60  of the collated documents. We have withheld some 
information under the following sections of the OIA: 
 
6(a): to avoid prejudicing the security or defence of New Zealand or the international 
relations of the New Zealand Government;  
 
6(b)(i): to protect the passing of information from another government on a 
confidential basis; 
 
6(b)(ii): to protect the passing of information from an international organisation on a 
confidential basis; and 
 
9(2)(a): to protect individuals’ privacy. 
 
Where the information has been withheld under section 9 of the OIA, we identified no 
public interest in releasing the information that would override the reasons for withholding 
it. 
In response to your requests for the dates of these communications, this information is 
contained within the documents provided. 
 
Section 5: 
12) The dates, since October 2020, of any meetings or correspondence any MFAT 
official has had with any member or representative of the government of the United 
Kingdom that included mention of either country's obligations under the Convention 
on Cluster Munitions. 

13) The dates, since October 2020, of any meetings or correspondence any New 
Zealand government minister has had with any member or representative of the 
government of the United Kingdom that included mention of either country's 

obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions. 
 
Part 12 of your request is refused in full under section 18(f) of the OIA, as the information 
requested cannot be made available without substantial collation and research. This is 
because New Zealand meets regularly with States Parties, signatories and observers to the 
Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM). New Zealand was National Implementation 
Measures coordinator for 10 years (until 2023), as part of the CCM Coordination 
Committee, and during this time we met regularly with other States to discuss Treaty 

 
Page 7 of 9
 
 
implementation. In addition, the United Kingdom was the President of the Tenth Meeting 
of States Parties to the CCM, which took place from 30 August to 2 September 2022. As 
the United Kingdom was CCM President and President designate during the time period in 
your request, New Zealand engaged with the United Kingdom in Coordination Committee 
meetings during that time. The minutes and dates of these meetings are publicly available 
via the link below: www.clusterconvention.org/minutes/  
 
Regarding part 13 of your request. Between the dates of 1 October 2020 and the date of 
your request, no New Zealand Minister met with any member or representative of the 
government of the United Kingdom to discuss the Convention on Cluster Munitions. 
Accordingly, this part of your request is refused under section 18(e) of the OIA, as the 
information requested does not exist. 
 
In response to your section 16 preference: 
(a) to receive a copy of the whole of each document – this was not possible because 
reviewing the entirety of all documents that are partially in scope of your request 
would impact on the agency’s ability to carry out its other operations section 
16(2)(a) of the OIA refers); 
(b) that the information is disclosed in a text searchable format, either Word or PDF – 
due to the Ministry’s security requirements we are unable to complete this section 
16 preference as doing so would require substantial additional administrative work. 
Doing so would impair efficient administration (section 16(2)(a) of the OIA refers); 
(c) that it does not have a watermark of ‘Released under the Official Information Act’ 
or similar across the text – while we are unable to release these documents without 
a watermark, we have moved this watermark to the margins of each page so it 
does not interfere with the text; 
(d) that it is sent to the email address from which the Ministry received this request – 
this response will be sent to the address the Ministry received it from (fyi-request-
[email address]). 
 
In response to your section 19(a)(ii) request please refer to Annex 1. 
 
In response to your statement around section 17(2) of the Public Records Act 2005 the 
Ministry’s records management system allows us to locate information potentially in scope 
of an OIA request using key words/document type/date etc, but in order for us to confirm 
if any documents are in scope of an OIA request every document needs to be manually 
reviewed. 
 
Please note that it is our policy to proactively release our responses to official information 
requests where possible. Therefore, our response to your request (with your personal 
information removed) may be published on the Ministry website: 
www.mfat.govt.nz/en/about-us/contact-us/official-information-act-responses/  
 
 
 


 
Page 8 of 9
 
 
If you have any questions about this decision, you can contact us by email at: 
[email address]. You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the 
Ombudsman of this decision by contacting www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or freephone 
0800 802 602. 
 
Nāku noa, nā 
 
 
 
 
Sarah Corbett 
for Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade 
 

 
Page 9 of 9
 
 
Annex 1. 
Section 19(a)(ii) request. 
 
OIA 
Rational 
Public Interest 
Code 
Considerations 
6(a) 
Information that if released would impact New Zealands 
Not Applicable 
international relations with: 
-  United States of America, 
-  Ukraine, 
-  Russia, and 
-  Other partners. 
Providing a full list of countries could damage international relations 
so has not been provided. 
6(b)(i) 
Information supplied to New Zealand on a basis of confidence 
Not Applicable 
from other governments that was shared on a basis of confidence, 
for example: 
-  Ukraine, and 
-  America. 
Providing a full list of countries could damage international relations 
so has not been provided. 
6(b)(ii) 
Information supplied to New Zealand on the basis of confidence by  Not Applicable 
any international organisation. 
-  Information relayed to us by the Convention on Cluster 
Munitions state members. 
9(2)(a) 
Protect the privacy of natural persons. 
Considered and 
-
not outweighed 
  Phone numbers are withheld to protect the privacy of staff. 
9(2)(g)(i)  The free and frank expression of opinions. 
Considered and 
-
not outweighed 
  Opinion/interpretation on other countries decisions.  
-  ‘If asked’ media lines are withheld as they are the free and 
frank expression of opinions by officials and contains 
speculative thinking. Officials need to be able to express 
opinions to maintain the effective conduct of Foreign 
Affairs. Release would make officials less likely to generate 
similar information in the future. 
9(2)(h) 
Maintain legal professional privilege. 
Considered and 
-
not outweighed 
  Advice provided by the Ministry’s legal team, to protect 
confidential communications between solicitor and client. It 
is based on the impossibility of conducting legal business 
without professional assistance and the need for full and 
unreserved confidence between adviser and client in order 
to receive that assistance effectively.