JCOIA 195 Briefings Redacted.pdf

BRIEFING
Science System Advisory Group
Date:
20 December 2023
Priority:
High
Security
In Confidence
Tracking
2324-1430
classification:
number:
Purpose
To seek your feedback on the draft terms of reference and membership for MBIE’s Science
System Advisory Group.
Recommended action
ACT 1982
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment recommends that you:
a
Provide feedback on the draft terms of reference and membership of MBIE’s Science
System Advisory Panel.
Agree / Disagree

INFORMATION

Dr Prue Williams
Hon Judith Collins
General Manager
Minister of Science, Innovation and
Future Research System
Technology
20 / 12 / 2023
..... / ...... / ......
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1430
In Confidence
1

Background
1.
At your meeting with officials on 18 December you asked MBIE to convene a panel to
provide advice on:
a.
the current state of the science system
b.
areas for improvement
c.
core principles under which the system should operate
d.
actions to enhance the effectiveness and impact of the system.
2.
This briefing provides an update on progress to establish a Science System Advisory Panel
(the panel) and seeks your feedback on the draft terms of reference and potential panel
members.
ACT 1982
Terms of reference
3.
We have reviewed and discussed with Professor Sir Peter Gluckman the terms of reference
he prepared.  We have agreed to the scope of the terms of reference and note that an edit
may be needed in the New Year to ensure the draft is tidy before being finalised and
published.  An updated draft is provided for your feedback in Annex One.
4.
We have suggested the terms of reference focus on establishing an advisory panel rather
than a review, and that it direct the panel’s attention the following six areas of specific
INFORMATION
interest:
a.
Science funding system.
b.
Public science institutions.
c.
Nationally critical science services, scientific monitoring, and national scale data
collection, storage and provision.
d.
Increasing focus on advanced technologies.
e.
Government as a commissioner and purchaser of science.
f.
Role of Government’s science funding bodies.
5.
The panel will be convened by MBIE, have an independent chair and members, and have
secretariat support provided by MBIE.
6.
The key deliverables are:
a
May 2024:  Report with high level recommendations and principles about the future of
the science system.
b.
October 2024: Report with recommended changes in form or in operation that might be
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
needed to ensure a more effective science system.
Members
7.
We expect the panel may have up to seven members, in addition to the chair and the Prime
Minister’s Chief Science Advisor serving as an ex officio member.  Members should
collectively:

2324-1430
In Confidence
2

s 9(2)(a)
Next steps
12.  Once we have your feedback, we will:
a.
finalise the terms of reference and membership of the panel
b.
work with the Chair to clarify how he would like the panel to operate
c.
develop a communication plan
ACT 1982
d.
provide you with regular updates on progress.
Annexes
Annex One:
Draft, updated terms of reference
Annex Two:   Short biographies of potential panel members

INFORMATION
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1430
In Confidence
4

Annex One: Draft, updated terms of reference

Introduction
1.  The Government of New Zealand is committed to maintaining a thriving science system that
delivers growth for New Zealand’s economy, environment and society. The Science System
Advisory Panel (the panel) will comprehensively assess the current state of the science
system, identify areas for improvement, establish core principles under which the system
should operate in the coming decades, and propose evidence-based actions that could
enhance its effectiveness and impact.

2.  There are several compelling reasons why an assessment of the New Zealand science system
is necessary and needed now. These include:
a.  Economic transformation: New Zealand needs to move towards a knowledge-based
ACT 1982
economy, and a robust science system is essential for driving innovation and economic
growth.
b.  Addressing emerging challenges: New Zealand faces numerous pressing challenges,
including climate change, biodiversity loss, sociological change, economic diversification,
and an ageing population. A robust science system is crucial for developing innovative
solutions to these challenges. However, the current system may not be fully equipped to
address these complex issues effectively.
c.  Adapting to a changing landscape: The global research landscape is evolving rapidly,
with new technologies, funding models, and collaboration opportunities emerging. The New
INFORMATION
Zealand science system needs to adapt to these changes to remain competitive and
continue producing impactful research.
d.  Governmental use of scientific data and knowledge: The rapid emergence of big data,
AI, and related technologies offers governments ways to enhance their effectiveness
across social, environmental and economic domains.

3.  The science system suffers from systematic concerns including:
a.  Funding and allocation: Concerns have been raised about the adequacy and
sustainability of science funding, as well as the effectiveness of funding mechanisms in
addressing national priorities.
b.  Research infrastructure and resources: Access to research facilities and equipment can
be unevenly distributed, hindering research progress and collaboration.
c.  Regulatory frameworks and incentives: Regulatory frameworks and current incentives
may not be conducive to the most effective management of research and research
innovation or commercialisation.
d.  System inefficiencies and fragmentation: Concerns have been raised about
inefficiencies in the current system, including excessive managerialism, complex funding
mechanisms, fragmented research efforts, and limited collaboration between different
stakeholders. A review can identify these issues and recommend solutions for streamlining
and optimizing the system.
e.  The state of the research workforce
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
f.  The over-competitive state of the two major components of the public research system:
the CRIs and Universities.

4.  There are the following opportunities for improvement:
a.  Measuring impact and maximizing return on investment: New Zealand invests
significant resources in its science system. The panel can assess the impact of these
investments and identify strategies to maximize the return on investment for the nation.

2324-1430
In Confidence
5

b.  Benchmarking against international best practices: By comparing the New Zealand
science system to other successful systems globally, the panel can identify areas for
improvement and learn from best practices in other countries.
c.  Building a diverse and inclusive science workforce: New Zealand needs to attract and
retain talented researchers from all backgrounds to ensure the long-term sustainability of its
science system. The panel can assess the current state of diversity and inclusion within the
science workforce and recommend strategies for improvement.
d.  Enhancing public trust and engagement: Public understanding and trust in science are
crucial for informed decision-making and addressing societal challenges. The panel can
explore ways to improve public engagement with science and strengthen the relationship
between the science community and the public.
e.  Building a sustainable future for science in New Zealand: The panel can provide a
roadmap for the future of the New Zealand science system, ensuring its continued success
and relevance in the face of evolving challenges and opportunities.
ACT 1982

5.  The panel will provide a comprehensive assessment of these issues, identify areas for
improvement, and develop evidence-based recommendations for strengthening the science
system. This wil  ensure New Zealand’s science community, while small by global comparison,
remains vibrant, impactful, and well-equipped to tackle the challenges and opportunities in the
coming decades.
Purpose
6.  These Terms of Reference provide high level guidance on the scope, method, governance,
and timeframe of the work that the panel will undertake. INFORMATION
Objectives
7.  The panel will:

a.  Assess the effectiveness of the current science system in achieving its goals, including:
i.  Delivering research that addresses national priorities and challenges.
ii.  Fostering innovation and economic growth.
iii.  Building a strong, diverse, and inclusive science workforce.
iv.  Ensuring public understanding and engagement with science.

b.  Identify strengths, weaknesses, barriers, opportunities, and threats within the system,
including:
i.  Funding mechanisms and allocation strategies.
ii.  Research infrastructure and resources.
iii.  Collaboration and partnerships between stakeholders.
iv.  Regulatory frameworks, incentives and policies.
v.  Systems for research evaluation and impact assessment.
vi   Career pathways and development opportunities for researchers.
vii.  International research  partnerships and promoting innovation partnerships

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
c.  Benchmark the New Zealand science system against international best practices and
identify potential areas for learning and adaptation.

d.  Develop a set of evidence-based recommendations for strengthening the science system
and ensuring its future sustainability and success.

8.  The panel’s advice wil  focus on the following six areas of specific interest:

2324-1430
In Confidence
6

a.  The science funding system, including the balance between competitive and stable
funds, the best modalities of funding to achieve the opportunities for improvement
described above, and the optimal mixture of funding instruments.

b.  Our public research institutions (CRIs and Universities, the latter in terms of their
research activities), including the optimal size, focus, number and role in the New Zealand
science system.

c.  The optimal configuration of science organisations, infrastructure and funding to
deliver on nationally critical science services, scientific monitoring, and national
scale data collection, storage and provision.

d.  Pathways to increasing the focus of New Zealand’s science system on advanced
technologies.

ACT 1982
e.  The best way for government to act as a commissioner and purchaser of science,
where that science is an input into delivery of the core roles of government, its ministries
and its departments, including regional and local government. This advice should include
considering how science purchasing should be planned, how government should decide
upon and communicate its preferred direction, and how scarce resources should be
distributed between competing demands for science from government departments.

f.  The role of Government’s science funding bodies  including their focus, scope, mode of
operation, and any opportunities to share resources and expertise.
INFORMATION
Scope
9.  The panel will cover the entirety of the New Zealand science system, including:

a.  The processes of prioritization of expenditure within New Zealand’s research investment.
This includes:

i.  Giving focus to ensuring excellence and impact of research as the primary goals of the
research system.
ii.  Ensuring a balanced portfolio of research across basic, applied and translational
activities.
iii.  Recognising that New Zealand as a small country cannot do everything in science and
establish principles to be applied in prioritization.
iv.  Recognising that research into New Zealand’s own history, biota and indigenous
knowledge (Mātauranga Māori) are important components of the New Zealand
research system.
v   That New Zealand has research obligations to the Pacific and must be a relevant and
active global partner in research
b.  Public and private research institutions (universities, Crown Research Institutes, private
research companies).
c.  Funding agencies and bodies (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Health
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Research Council, Marsden Fund, Callaghan Innovation etc.).
d.  Research infrastructure and facilities.
e.  Science education and training pathways (in conjunction with the higher education review).
f.  Regulatory frameworks and policies impacting research.
g.  Interactions with the private sector and utilisation of research.
h.  Public engagement and communication of science.

2324-1430
In Confidence
7

10. The panel will be coordinated with a review into aspects of higher education including the
future of the PBRF and related incentive structures.

11. The Research and Development Tax Incentive wil  be out of scope for the panel’s
consideration, noting that a statutory independent evaluation is mandated by Parliament for the
coming calendar year.

12. This panel is not charged with producing fully costed options or detail all the structural
arrangements necessary to achieve the recommendations presented.

Approach
The panel will employ a mixed-methods approach, including:
•  Document review: Analysis of existing reports, strategies, and data on the science system.
•
ACT 1982
  Stakeholder consultations: with researchers, research and academic. leaders, policymakers,
industry representatives and relevant interest groups.
•  Comparative analysis of science systems in other countries.
•  Data analysis: Examination of relevant data on research funding, outputs, and impacts.

Panel
13. The panel will consist of experts with diverse backgrounds and expertise in science, research,
policy, and stakeholder engagement. The panel will be convened by MBIE with membership
approved by the Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology, and will operate transparently
INFORMATION
and impartially.
14. The terms of reference including the composition of the panel is provided in Annex A.
Timeline
15. The panel process is expected to commence in early 2024 and be completed by October 2024.
The work will be conducted in two phases.

16. Phase 1 will determine a set of high level recommendations and principles regarding the future
of the science system. In particular it will focus on making recommendations related to
enhancing the functions of the science system.

17. Phase 2 will address the changes in form or in operation that might be needed to ensure a
more effective system appropriate for the coming decades. It will identify both short term
actions and structural and other actions that might be considered over the longer term.

18.  The final report will be submitted to MBIE and the Minister of Science, Innovation and
Technology and made publicly available.

19. The anticipated timing of key deliverables is outlined as follows:
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Deliverable
Due Date
Establishment of the Panel
January 2024
Terms of Reference approved
January 2024
Document review and baseline assessment
By March 2024
Stakeholder engagement and consultation
By April 2024

2324-1430
In Confidence
8

Phase 1 report by the Panel
By May 2024
Phase 2 report by the Panel
By 30 October 2024

Reporting
The panel will produce a comprehensive report that includes:
•  An assessment of the current state of the New Zealand science system.
•  An analysis of the key findings and recommendations for reform from the review.
•  A clear and actionable roadmap for strengthening the science system.
•  A plan for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of recommendations.
Funding
All costs related to the development of the High-Level Science Policy Review will be charged
ACT 1982
against MBIE’s departmental budget. Personnel resources for the panel will be drawn from within
MBIE.

INFORMATION
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1430
In Confidence
9

Attachment A
Terms of Reference
Science System Advisory Panel
Purpose
1.  Formation of the Panel to provide advice on the Science System.
Background
2.  Within the Terms of Reference for the Advisory Panel, it was noted that the Minister of Science,
Innovation and Technology has asked MBIE to convene and engage the Panel.
Scope
3.  The Advisory Panel will lead the review on behalf of MBIE but will operate separately from
officials throughout the review period.
ACT 1982

4.  It is expected that the Panel will leverage the expertise of the members and consider
perspectives from a range of different backgrounds, with the intention of challenging, testing
and reviewing the existing science and research system. This will ensure that the outcomes are
sound, viable and well-considered.

5.  To achieve this, the Panel will be provided with access to appropriate and relevant material and
information as well as access to appropriate individuals within the relevant agencies.

INFORMATION
6.  It is expected that the delivery of the Panel’s work will take until October 2024. The Panel will
be involved in the entirety of the process, providing advice in the following areas as necessary:
•  The Panel will provide advice on public consultation activities.
•  The Panel will also provide advice, and consider any issues, on any other matters relating
to the science system at the request of the Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology.

7.  The advice provided will be non-binding. The Advisory Panel is not obliged to put forward one
singular view if differences of opinion may arise.

8.  The Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology may consider any advice provided but will
retain responsibility for any recommendations to Government.
Term of Appointment
9.  A term of appointment will commence from the date of appointment and will run until the
completion of the Panel’s work, which is expected to be by October 2024.
Meeting Frequency
10. The Panel will meet at a frequency determined by the Chair and agreed by MBIE.
Regular Reporting
11. The Panel will report at an agreed frequency, to be determined by the Chair and agreed with
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
MBIE.

12. The Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology may choose to share updates with
ministerial colleagues or Cabinet as appropriate.
Membership
13. The Panel will be convened by MBIE with feedback on membership provided by the Minister of
Science, Innovation and Technology.

2324-1430
In Confidence
10

14. It is expected that the Panel will consist of up to nine members, who will collectively bring a
wide range of expertise and experience, to support the quality of advice.

15. While a wide range of areas of expertise has been sought, a particular emphasis has been
placed on public sector and government, science delivery and translation to actionable
knowledge, and international experience.
Resourcing Requirements
16. A modest dedicated secretariat function will be established to provide support the requirements
of the Panel to arrange meetings, source relevant documents and prepare reporting material.

17. The secretariat functions will be shared with the Higher Educational review.
Conflicts of Interest
ACT 1982
18. Appropriate enquiries concerning conflicts of interest will be carried out to identify any conflicts
of interest that could reasonably be identified.

19. If any conflicts of interest should arise during the term of the Panel  mitigations will be put in
place to address these.

INFORMATION
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1430
In Confidence
11

Annex Two: Short biographies of potential panel members

Candidate
Biography
Sir Peter
Sir Peter Gluckman is a New Zealand scientist. He originally trained as a
Gluckman
paediatrician and served as the inaugural Chief Science Advisor to the New
Zealand Prime Minister from 2009 to 2018. He is a founding member and was the
inaugural chair of the International Network for Government Science Advice and is
the president of the International Science Council.
ONZ KNZM FRS FMedSci FRSNZ
982
s 9(2)(a)
Dr William
Dr William Rolleston is the co-founder of the biotechnology and vaccine
Rolleston
manufacturing company South Pacific Sera Limited. Dr Rolleston has a degree in
medicine and has received many awards and accolades for his contribution to

biotechnology.
He was the founding chair of Aotearoa New Zealand’s biotechnology industry
association (now Biotech NZ), and the Life Sciences Network, as well as president
of both New Zealand Federated Farmers and the World Farmers Organisation.
Dr Rolleston has also served many roles as an advisor to central and local
government.
CNZM
s 9(2)(a)
R THE OFFICIAL
Ms Nadia
Ms Levin is the CEO and Managing Director of Research Australia. Her career has
Levin
included working across complex and highly regulated environments, and subject
to high public scrutiny.

Ms Levin held roles that saw her working in both the public and private sectors, as
well as in an advisory role to Federal Government Minister. She was a Director of
the Australian Synchrotron Board until 2015 and is on the Board of New
Zealanders for Health Research.

2324-1430
In Confidence
12

She is also PhD mentor in the Industry Mentoring Network in STEM (IMNIS)
programme.
Dr Herman
Dr Hauser holds an MA in Physics from Vienna University and a PhD in Physics
Hauser
from the University of Cambridge. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Physics and of
the Royal Academy of Engineering, and an Honorary Fel ow of King’s College,
Cambridge.
Dr Hauser holds honorary doctorates from the Universities of Bath,
Loughborough, Anglia Ruskin, Strathclyde, Glasgow and York and was awarded
an Honorary CBE for ‘innovative service to the UK enterprise sector’ in 2001.
Dr Hauser co-founded Amadeus Capital Partners in 1997 with Anne Glover. In his
long and successful history as an entrepreneur and venture capitalist, he has
founded or co-founded companies in a wide range of technology sectors.
Professor
Professor Mark Ferguson is Chair of the Board of the European Innovation Council
ACT 1982
Mark
for the European Commission. He previously served as Director General of
Ferguson
Science Foundation Ireland and Chief Scientific Adviser to the Government of
Ireland.

He has served on Boards and Committees internationally concerning research,
innovation and science advice, eg Governing Boards of the Global Research
Council and the European Union Joint Research Centre.
Professor Ferguson is the recipient of numerous international research prizes
and awards including the 2002 European Science Prize (jointly).
INFORMATION
His research interests include cellular and molecular mechanisms of wound
healing and scarring and cleft palete developmental mechanisms.

Short-list of other potential candidates (not yet contacted)
Candidate
Biography
Distinguished
Distinguished Professor Hamish Spencer is a professor of evolutionary biology,
Professor
in the department of zoology at the University of Otago, holding a PhD in
Hamish
evolutionary biology from Harvard University.
Spencer
He specialises in using mathematical modelling and molecular genetics to
understand the processes driving the evolution of the world’s broad biodiversity.
He is one of three New Zealand researchers to receive a Royal Society of New
Zealand James Cook Research Fellowship, as well as serving as an editorial
member for many reputable journals internationally and authoring many books
and articles relating to his field of research.
Tracey
Tracey McIntosh is Ngāi Tūhoe and is Professor of Indigenous Studies at the
McIntosh
University of Auckland. She is the Chief Science Advisor for the Ministry of
Social Development and a Commissioner of Te Kāhui Tātari Ture: Criminal
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Cases Review Commission.
She was the former Co-Director of Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga New Zealand’s
Māori Centre of Research Excellence. She previously taught in the sociology
and criminology programme at the University of Auckland. She was a Fulbright
Visiting Lecturer in New Zealand Studies at Georgetown University in
Washington D.C. and lectured at the University of the South Pacific in Fiji.

2324-1430
In Confidence
13

She has sat on a number of assessment panels including PBRF panels,
Marsden Social Science Panel, Rutherford Discovery, James Cook Fellowship
and Health Research Council Panels. In 2012 she served as the co-chair of the
Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty.
She was a member of the Welfare Expert Advisory Group, Te Uepū Hapai i te
Ora-The Safe and Effective Justice Advisory Group and a member of the
Advisory Commission into the Incarceration Rates of Australia.
MNZM
Dr Barb Hayden  Dr Barb Hayden is a scientific pioneer in the mussel aquaculture industry and in
biosecurity. She is the Chief Scientist Coasts and Oceans (NIWA) and leads

NIWA’s coasts and oceans research, which focuses on ecosystem-based
approaches to managing activities in New Zealand’s marine estate, so that
economic and social benefits are realised while vulnerable components of the
ACT 1982
ecosystem are protected.
As Chief Scientist of NIWA, she raised awareness of the need to protect
biodiversity and established and chaired the first Ballast Water Working Group
that was the genesis of marine biosecurity in New Zealand.
In 2019 the NZMSS award was presented to Dr Hayden for her substantial
contribution to marine science in New Zealand over a long and distinguished
career that has included setting strategic research directions, leading major
research programs, and mentoring emerging researchers.
INFORMATION
s 9(2)(a)

2324-1430
In Confidence
14

s 9(2)(a)

RELEASED UNDER THE OFF

2324-1430
In Confidence
15

BRIEFING
Letter of appointment, Science System Advisory Group
Date:
9 January 2024
Priority:
Medium
Security
In Confidence
Tracking
2324-1506
classification:
number:
Purpose
To provide you with a draft Letter of Appointment for the appointment of members to the Science
System Advisory Group, and to update you on progress to establish the Group.
Recommended action
ACT 1982
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment recommends that you:
a
Note the Letter of Appointment for the Science System Advisory Group
Noted

INFORMATION

Landon McMillan
Hon Judith Collins
Manager, Science Policy
Minister of Science, Innovation, and
Future Research System, MBIE
Technology

10 / 01 / 2024
..... / ...... / ......

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1506
In Confidence
1

Barb Hayden
Member
Chief Scientist Coasts and Oceans, NIWA.  CRI
Not
perspective; Marine biology.
approached
s 9(2)(a)

5.
MBIE has been in touch with Dr Herman Hauser and s 9(2)(a)
and are waiting
for confirmation on their interest and availability.
ACT
6.
s 9(2)(a)
has declined the invitation for Group membership. MBIE is considering
other potential members with Te Ao Māori knowledge and experience to suggest.
7.
Given you have indicated the Group should have a whole of system view, MBIE believes that
the fields of health and biology will be covered by prospective members Dr William Rolleston,
Professor Mark Ferguson, s 9(2)(a)
, Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, and
Ms Nadia Levin, and would like to consider prospective members from other fields of
expertise (for example engineering and technology).  INFORMATION
8.
CRI membership is also yet to be finalised, and MBIE considers this as a further opportunity
to include another prospective member who has expertise in Te Ao Māori on the Group.
9.
We will approach prospective members from CRIs and Universities following your feedback
to the draft Terms of Reference and timeframes, and after further discussion with Sir Peter.
10.  We will also discuss with Sir Peter the possibility of using consultants to advise the Group,
including those with innovation and early-stage company experience, like Mr Oren Gershtein.
Terms of Reference
11.  In our briefing to you on 20 December 2023 we attached a draft Terms of Reference
following our initial discussions with the proposed chair of the Group, Professor Sir Peter
Gluckman.
12.  MBIE have had an initial meeting with Professor Sir Peter Gluckman to discuss the Terms of
Reference and have agreed to have a meeting in the week starting 15 January 2024 to
continue the conversation about the Terms of Reference, timeframes and operation of the
Group.
13.  Sir Peter has indicated a proposed timeframe which has first phase (high level
recommendations) delivered by May 2024, and a final report (institutional/operational
arrangements) in by October. You have indicated a preference for a faster completion. MBIE
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
will discuss with Sir Peter whether he is able to deliver it faster.
14.  MBIE intends to send the final Terms of Reference to the prospective Group members as an
attachment to the letters.
15.  The draft Terms of Reference are included in Annex Two.
Draft Letter of Appointment

2324-1506
In Confidence
3

16.  MBIE has drafted a Letter of Appointment to send to the prospective members who accept
the invitation to sit on the Group (attached in Annex One).
17.  The Letter briefly details the Group’s responsibilities and expresses the Government’s
commitment to maintaining a thriving science system that delivers growth for New Zealand. It
will also include the Group’s Terms of Reference as an attachment, and a letter of
acknowledgement and acceptance for those accepting the appointment to sign and return
(attached in Annex Three).
Next steps
18.  MBIE and your office to finalise Group membership.
19.  MBIE to finalise the Letter of Appointment and Terms of Reference for discussion with
members.
ACT 1982
20.  MBIE to send Letters of Appointment and final Terms of Reference to prospective members.
Annexes
Annex One: Draft Letter of Appointment
Annex Two: Draft Terms of Reference
Annex Three: Draft Acknowledgement and Acceptance
INFORMATION

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1506
In Confidence
4

Annex One: Draft Letter of Appointment

[Insert recipient’s address]
[Line two]
[Line three]
[Line four]

[Insert date]

ACT 1982
Tēnā koe XXX,

Appointment to the Science System Advisory Group, established by the Ministry of Business, Innovation,
and Employment.

It is with great pleasure that I offer you appointment as a member of the Science System Advisory Group,
established by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE).

The Science System Advisory Group will be responsible for comprehensively assessing the state of the
INFORMATION
science system, identifying areas of improvement, establish core principles under which the system should
operate in the coming decades, and proposing evidence-based actions to MBIE for the potential
enhancement of its effectiveness and impact.

The Government is committed to maintaining a thriving system that delivers for New Zealand’s economy,
environment and society, and we look forward to your contribution to this effort.

Please find attached the Terms of Reference, which describe in more detail the roles and responsibilities,
key deliverables and operational arrangements of the Group, as well as how to manage potential conflicts
of interest.

If you wish to accept this appointment, please sign the attached Acknowledgement of Appointment and
return it via email to XXXX [EMAIL ADDRESS]

Nāku iti noa, nā,

Nic Blakely,
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Deputy Secretary,
Labour, Science and Enterprise
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

2324-1506
In Confidence
5

Annex Two: Draft Attachments
Draft Terms of Reference – Science System Advisory Group
Introduction
1.  The Government of New Zealand is committed to maintaining a thriving science system that
delivers growth for New Zealand’s economy, environment and society. The Science System
Advisory Group (the Group) will comprehensively assess the current state of the science
system, identify areas for improvement, establish core principles under which the system
should operate in the coming decades, and propose evidence-based actions that could
enhance its effectiveness and impact.

2.  There are several compelling reasons why an assessment of the New Zealand science system
is necessary and needed now. These include:
ACT 1982
a.  Economic transformation: New Zealand needs to move towards a knowledge-based
economy, and a robust science system is essential for driving innovation and economic
growth.
b.  Addressing emerging challenges: New Zealand faces numerous pressing challenges,
including climate change, biodiversity loss, sociological change, economic diversification,
and an ageing population. A robust science system is crucial for developing innovative
solutions to these challenges. However, the current system may not be fully equipped to
address these complex issues effectively.
c.  Adapting to a changing landscape: The global research landscape is evolving rapidly,
with new technologies, funding models, and collaboration opportunities emergi
INFORMATION  ng. The New
Zealand science system needs to adapt to these changes to remain competitive and
continue producing impactful research.
d.  Governmental use of scientific data and knowledge: The rapid emergence of big data,
AI, and related technologies offers governments ways to enhance their effectiveness
across social, environmental and economic domains.

3.  The science system suffers from systematic concerns including:
a.  Funding and allocation: Concerns have been raised about the adequacy and
sustainability of science funding, as well as the effectiveness of funding mechanisms in
addressing national priorities.
b.  Research infrastructure and resources: Access to research facilities and equipment can
be unevenly distributed, hindering research progress and collaboration.
c.  Regulatory frameworks and incentives: Regulatory frameworks and current incentives
may not be conducive to the most effective management of research and research
innovation or commercialisation.
d.  System inefficiencies and fragmentation: Concerns have been raised about
inefficiencies in the current system, including excessive managerialism, complex funding
mechanisms, fragmented research efforts, and limited collaboration between different
stakeholders. A review can identify these issues and recommend solutions for streamlining
and optimizing the system.
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
e.  The state of the research workforce
f.  The over-competitive state of the two major components of the public research system:
the CRIs and Universities.

4.  There are the following opportunities for improvement:
a.  Measuring impact and maximizing return on investment: New Zealand invests
significant resources in its science system. The Group can assess the impact of these
investments and identify strategies to maximize the return on investment for the nation.

2324-1506
In Confidence
6

b.  Benchmarking against international best practices: By comparing the New Zealand
science system to other successful systems globally, the Group can identify areas for
improvement and learn from best practices in other countries.
c.  Building a diverse and inclusive science workforce: New Zealand needs to attract and
retain talented researchers from all backgrounds to ensure the long-term sustainability of its
science system. The Group can assess the current state of diversity and inclusion within
the science workforce and recommend strategies for improvement.
d.  Enhancing public trust and engagement: Public understanding and trust in science are
crucial for informed decision-making and addressing societal challenges. The Group can
explore ways to improve public engagement with science and strengthen the relationship
between the science community and the public.
e.  Building a sustainable future for science in New Zealand: The Group can provide a
roadmap for the future of the New Zealand science system, ensuring its continued success
and relevance in the face of evolving challenges and opportunities.
ACT 1982

5.  The Group will provide a comprehensive assessment of these issues, identify areas for
improvement, and develop evidence-based recommendations for strengthening the science
system. This wil  ensure New Zealand’s science community, while small by global comparison,
remains vibrant, impactful, and well-equipped to tackle the challenges and opportunities in the
coming decades.
Purpose
6.  These Terms of Reference provide high level guidance on the scope, method, governance,
and timeframe of the work that the group will undertake
INFORMATION
Objectives
7.  The Group will:

a.  Assess the effectiveness of the current science system in achieving its goals, including:
i.  Delivering research that addresses national priorities and challenges.
ii.  Fostering innovation and economic growth.
iii.  Building a strong, diverse, and inclusive science workforce.
iv.  Ensuring public understanding and engagement with science.

b.  Identify strengths, weaknesses, barriers, opportunities, and threats within the system,
including:
i.  Funding mechanisms and allocation strategies.
ii.  Research infrastructure and resources.
iii.  Collaboration and partnerships between stakeholders.
iv.  Regulatory frameworks, incentives and policies.
v.  Systems for research evaluation and impact assessment.
vi   Career pathways and development opportunities for researchers.
vii.  International research partnerships and promoting innovation partnerships

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
c.  Benchmark the New Zealand science system against international best practices and
identify potential areas for learning and adaptation.

d.  Develop a set of evidence-based recommendations for strengthening the science system
and ensuring its future sustainability and success.

8.  The Group’s advice wil  focus on the following six areas of specific interest:

2324-1506
In Confidence
7

a.  The science funding system, including the balance between competitive and stable
funds, the best modalities of funding to achieve the opportunities for improvement
described above, and the optimal mixture of funding instruments.

b.  Our public research institutions (CRIs and Universities, the latter in terms of their
research activities), including the optimal size, focus, number and role in the New Zealand
science system.

c.  The optimal configuration of science organisations, infrastructure and funding to
deliver on nationally critical science services, scientific monitoring, and national
scale data collection, storage and provision.

d.  Pathways to increasing the focus of New Zealand’s science system on advanced
technologies.

ACT 1982
e.  The best way for government to act as a commissioner and purchaser of science,
where that science is an input into delivery of the core roles of government, its ministries
and its departments, including regional and local government. This advice should include
considering how science purchasing should be planned, how government should decide
upon and communicate its preferred direction, and how scarce resources should be
distributed between competing demands for science from government departments.

f.  The role of Government’s science funding bodies  including their focus, scope, mode of
operation, and any opportunities to share resources and expertise.
INFORMATION
Scope
9.  The Group will cover the entirety of the New Zealand science system, including:

a.  The processes of prioritization of expenditure within New Zealand’s research investment.
This includes:

i.  Giving focus to ensuring excellence and impact of research as the primary goals of the
research system.
ii.  Ensuring a balanced portfolio of research across basic, applied and translational
activities.
iii.  Recognising that New Zealand as a small country cannot do everything in science and
establish principles to be applied in prioritization.
iv.  Recognising that research into New Zealand’s own history, biota and indigenous
knowledge (Mātauranga Māori) are important components of the New Zealand
research system.
v   That New Zealand has research obligations to the Pacific and must be a relevant and
active global partner in research
b.  Public and private research institutions (universities, Crown Research Institutes, private
research companies).
c.  Funding agencies and bodies (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Health
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Research Council, Marsden Fund, Callaghan Innovation etc.).
d.  Research infrastructure and facilities.
e.  Science education and training pathways (in conjunction with the higher education review).
f.  Regulatory frameworks and policies impacting research.
g.  Interactions with the private sector and utilisation of research.
h.  Public engagement and communication of science.

2324-1506
In Confidence
8

10. The Group will be coordinated with a review into aspects of higher education including the
future of the PBRF and related incentive structures.

11. The Research and Development Tax Incentive will be out of scope for the Group’s
consideration, noting that a statutory independent evaluation is mandated by Parliament for the
coming calendar year.

12. This Group is not charged with producing fully costed options or detail all the structural
arrangements necessary to achieve the recommendations presented.

Approach
The Group will employ a mixed-methods approach, including:
•  Document review: Analysis of existing reports, strategies, and data on the science system.
•
ACT 1982
  Stakeholder consultations: with researchers, research and academic. leaders, policymakers,
industry representatives and relevant interest groups.
•  Comparative analysis of science systems in other countries.
•  Data analysis: Examination of relevant data on research funding, outputs, and impacts.

Group
13. The Group will consist of experts with diverse backgrounds and expertise in science, research,
policy, and stakeholder engagement. The Group will be convened by MBIE with membership
approved by the Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology, and will operate transparently
INFORMATION
and impartially.
14. The terms of reference including the composition of the Group is provided in Annex A.
Timeline
15. The Group process is expected to commence in early 2024 and be completed by October
2024. The work will be conducted in two phases.

16. Phase 1 will determine a set of high level recommendations and principles regarding the future
of the science system. In particular it will focus on making recommendations related to
enhancing the functions of the science system.

17. Phase 2 will address the changes in form or in operation that might be needed to ensure a
more effective system appropriate for the coming decades. It will identify both short term
actions and structural and other actions that might be considered over the longer term.

18.  The final report will be submitted to MBIE and the Minister of Science, Innovation and
Technology and made publicly available.

19. The anticipated timing of key deliverables is outlined as follows:
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Deliverable
Due Date
Establishment of the Group
January 2024
Terms of Reference approved
January 2024
Document review and baseline assessment
By March 2024
Stakeholder engagement and consultation
By April 2024

2324-1506
In Confidence
9

Phase 1 report by the Group
By May 2024
Phase 2 report by the Group
By 30 October 2024

Reporting
The Group will produce a comprehensive report that includes:
•  An assessment of the current state of the New Zealand science system.
•  An analysis of the key findings and recommendations for reform from the review.
•  A clear and actionable roadmap for strengthening the science system.
•  A plan for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of recommendations.
Funding
All costs related to the development of the High-Level Science Policy Review will be charged
ACT 1982
against MBIE’s departmental budget. Personnel resources for the Group will be drawn from within
MBIE.

INFORMATION
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1506
In Confidence
10

Terms of Reference
Science System Advisory Group
Purpose
1.  Formation of the Group to provide advice on the Science System.
Background
2.  Within the Terms of Reference for the Advisory Group, it was noted that the Minister of
Science, Innovation and Technology has asked MBIE to convene and engage the Group.
Scope
3.  The Advisory Group will lead the review on behalf of MBIE but will operate separately from
officials throughout the review period.

4.  It is expected that the Group will leverage the expertise of the members and consider
ACT 1982
perspectives from a range of different backgrounds, with the intention of challenging, testing
and reviewing the existing science and research system. This will ensure that the outcomes are
sound, viable and well-considered.

5.  To achieve this, the Group will be provided with access to appropriate and relevant material
and information as well as access to appropriate individuals within the relevant agencies.

6.  It is expected that the delivery of the Group’s work will take until October 2024. The Group will
be involved in the entirety of the process, providing advice in the following areas as necessary:
INFORMATION
•  The Group will provide advice on public consultation activities.
•  The Group will also provide advice, and consider any issues, on any other matters relating
to the science system at the request of the Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology.

7.  The advice provided will be non-binding  The Advisory Group is not obliged to put forward one
singular view if differences of opinion may arise.

8.  The Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology may consider any advice provided but will
retain responsibility for any recommendations to Government.
Term of Appointment
9.  A term of appointment will commence from the date of appointment and will run until the
completion of the Group’s work, which is expected to be by October 2024.
Meeting Frequency
10. The Group will meet at a frequency determined by the Chair and agreed by MBIE.
Regular Reporting
11. The Group will report at an agreed frequency, to be determined by the Chair and agreed with
MBIE.
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

12. The Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology may choose to share updates with
ministerial colleagues or Cabinet as appropriate.
Membership
13. The Group will be convened by MBIE with feedback on membership provided by the Minister of
Science, Innovation and Technology.


2324-1506
In Confidence
11

14. It is expected that the Group will consist of up to nine members, who will collectively bring a
wide range of expertise and experience, to support the quality of advice.

15. While a wide range of areas of expertise has been sought, a particular emphasis has been
placed on public sector and government, science delivery and translation to actionable
knowledge, and international experience.
Resourcing Requirements
16. A modest dedicated secretariat function will be established to provide support the requirements
of the Group to arrange meetings, source relevant documents and prepare reporting material

17. The secretariat functions will be shared with the Higher Educational review.
Conflicts of Interest
18. Appropriate enquiries concerning conflicts of interest will be carried out to identify any conflicts
ACT 1982
of interest that could reasonably be identified.

19. If any conflicts of interest should arise during the term of the Group, mitigations will be put in
place to address these.

INFORMATION
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1506
In Confidence
12

Annex Three: Draft Acknowledgement and Acceptance

Nic Blakely,
Deputy Secretary,
Labour, Science, and Enterprise,
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

Tēnā koe,

I acknowledge receipt of your letter appointing me as a member of the Science System Advisory
ACT 1982
Group.
I am aware of the need to disclose and manage any conflicts of interest as they arise, and aware of
how to manage confidential information.
I accept the appointment to the Science System Advisory Group.

Signed:

INFORMATION
Name:

Date:

Please return via email to: XXXX

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1506
In Confidence
13

BRIEFING
Title
Date:
19 January 2024
Priority:
Medium
Security
In Confidence
Tracking
2324-1626
classification:
number:
Purpose
To provide you with an update on the membership and progress on the operational arrangements
of the Science System Advisory Group, being established by the Ministry of Business, Innovation
and Employment.
ACT 1982
Recommended action
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment recommends that you:
a
Note the membership update for the Science System Advisory Group.
Noted
b
Agree that MBIE proceed to the final arrangements for Group establishment.
Agree / Disagree
INFORMATION

Landon McMillan
Hon Judith Collins
Manager, Science Policy
Minister of Science, Innovation and
Labour, Science and Enterprise, MBIE
Technology

25/01/2024
..... / ...... / ......
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1626
In Confidence
1

Background
1.
At your meeting with officials on the 18 December 2023, you asked the Ministry of Business,
Innovation and Employment (MBIE) to convene a Group to provide you with advice on:
a.
the current state of the science system
b.
areas for improvement
c.
core principles under which the system should operate, and
d.
actions to enhance the effectiveness and impact of the system.
2.
On 10 January 2024, we provided you with an update on the progress towards establishing
the Science System Advisory Group (the Group). This included an update on membership,
and the Terms of Reference, as well as providing you with a draft Letter of Appointment from
ACT 1982
MBIE to prospective members [2324-1506 refers].
3.
This briefing provides you with an update on the membership of the Group and progress on
the operational arrangements.
Group Membership
4.
In our 10 January 2024 briefing, we provided you with an updated list of candidates, their
availability, and their interest in joining the Group. A final update on those potential
candidates is set out below in Table One.
INFORMATION
Table One: Candidates and their interest and availability to be on the Group.
Potential member
Role
Experience and field
Response to
invitation
Sir Peter Gluckman
Chair
Former Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, New
Accepted
Zealand; Health research.
William Rolleston
Member
Co-founder of biotechnology company South Pacific
Accepted
Sera Limited; Biotechnology.
Nadia Levin
Member
CEO and Managing Director of Research Australia;
Accepted
Health research.
Hermann Hauser
Member
Entrepreneur and venture capitalist. Innovation and
Accepted
technology systems; Physics.
Mark Ferguson
Member
Board chair of the European Innovation Council.
Accepted
Science and research systems; Molecular biology.
Michael Ahie
Member
Pro Chancellor, Massey University. Chair, Plant and
Accepted
Food Research Board of Directors, Food Safety
Assurance Advisory Council, ComplyWith NZ Ldt, and
the Plant Market Access Council. Founder of AtlasQ
New Zealand. Te Ao Māori expertise; Business.
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Hamish Spencer
Member
Distinguished professor of evolutionary biology,
Accepted
University of Otago; Evolutionary genetics.
Tracey McIntosh
Member
Professor of Indigenous Studies, University of
Accepted
Auckland, Chief Science Advisor for the Ministry of
Social Development. Te Ao Māori expertise; Sociology.
Barb Hayden
Member
Lead  science  advisor,  coasts  and  oceans  research,
Accepted
NIWA; Marine biology.

2324-1626
In Confidence
2

5.
Following our conversation with you on 15 January 2024 we have also approach Hamish
Spencer and Tracey McIntosh, both of whom have accepted.
6.
Following discussions with Professor Sir Peter Gluckman we have made the addition of Dr
Barb Hayden and propose the addition of Mr Michael Ahie as members of the group, to
ensure representation from the Crown Research Institutes (CRI).
7.
Mr Michael Ahie was suggested to us by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman. He brings a wealth
of experience including CRI board membership, involvement in establishing Callaghan
Innovation, and Te Ao Māori. He is also Pro Chancellor of Massey University. Mr Ahie was
previously a member of the National Research Priorities Independent Strategic Panel.
8.
Dr Barb Hayden is an esteemed marine biologist, specialising in marine biosecurity and
environmental sustainability of aqua culture. Currently she leads NIWA’s coasts and oceans
ACT 1982
research, which focuses on ecosystem-based approaches to managing activities in New
Zealand’s marine estate, so that economic and social benefits are realised while vulnerable
components of the ecosystem are protected.
ION
s9(2)(f)(iv)
9.
10.  s9(2)(f)(iv)
11.  We also plan to contract Mr Oren Gershtein to the Group as an advisor; Professor Sir Peter
has a particular interest in his expertise on intellectual property translation pathways.
12.  We are comfortable with the prospective members and are ready to proceed to the final
stages of the Group’s establishment. Letters of appointment will be sent to members
alongside the final Terms of Reference (attached as Annex One).
Operational Arrangements for the Group
13.  Professor Sir Peter Gluckman has agreed that the group will deliver a preliminary report in
May. This report will contain sufficient initial recommendations to enable work to commence
on a reform programme relatively quickly.
14.  The terms of reference ask the preliminary report to focus on:
a.
Determining a set of principles for the system.
b.
Preliminary advice on institutional arrangements, funding, advanced technology and
RELEASED UNDER THE OF
commercialisation, the role of Government as a funder and commissioner of science,
and workforce connectedness.
c.
Recommendations that can be actioned in the near term and without major structural
changes.
15.  The final report will come through in October and address broader structural reform issues.
16.  We have agreed to contract administrative functions to Koi Tū – the Centre for Informed
Futures, an independent think tank at the University of Auckland associated with Professor

2324-1626
In Confidence
3

Sir Peter Gluckman.  He believes it will be more efficient to maintain administrative function
close to the Chair and we agree.
17.  We will liaise with Koi Tū to provide the Group with data, background information, and other
relevant information to support the work of the Group.
Communications
18.  We are exploring the option of announcing the Group before 12 February 2024 and co-
ordinating it with potential announcements from Minister Simmonds’ office on the advisory
group being established for the higher education sector.
19.  We will work with your office on the communication messages and potential dates for an
announcement.
20.  You are meeting with the CRI board chairs and Chief Executives on 30 January 2024. This
ACT 1982
could be an opportunity for you to signal the Group’s establishment.
Next steps
21.  MBIE to send the Letters of Appointment and final Terms of Reference to Members by 26
January 2024.
22.  MBIE and Group Chair, Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, to finalise operational arrangements.

INFORMATION
Annexes
Annex One: Final Terms of Reference
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1626
In Confidence
4

Annex One: Final Terms of Reference

Purpose
1.  MBIE is convening a Science System Advisory Group (the Group) to develop a set of
evidence-based recommendations to strengthen the science, innovation and technology
system and ensure its future success.

2.  This document sets out the Terms of Reference for the Group.
The aspiration
ACT 1982
3.  The Government is committed to building a thriving science, innovation, and technology system
(the system) that delivers growth for New Zealand’s economy, environment, and society by:
•  Driving innovation and accelerate the shift towards a knowledge-based, diversified
economy.
•  Developing innovative solutions to emerging challenges such as climate change,
biodiversity loss, and sociological change.
•  Adapting to, and making good of opportunities provided by, a rapidly evolving global
research landscape.
•  Enhancing Government’s effectiveness through the use scientific data, knowledge, and new
INFORMATION
technologies.

The challenges
4.  The systematic issues limiting the performance of the system include:
•  Funding: The adequacy, sustainability, and balance of funding in areas of national and
system importance, and effectiveness of funding mechanisms.
•  Research infrastructure: Uneven access to research facilities and equipment, hindering
research progress and collaboration.
•  Regulatory frameworks and incentives: These may not be conducive to the most
effective management of research and research innovation or commercialisation.
•  System inefficiencies and fragmentation: The system experiences inefficiencies, such
as excessive managerialism, complex funding mechanisms, fragmented research efforts,
and limited collaboration between different stakeholders.
•  Workforce: Career pathways are uncertain, diversity is limited, Māori and Pacific Peoples
are under-represented and under-served, and there are difficulties in attracting and
retaining the best talent.
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
•  Competition: Competition between research organisations limits collaboration and benefit
to New Zealand.
•  Industry: co-ordination across government and industry need strategic redevelopment,
Industry co-operation and support is not well positioned to adapt to emerging markets (e.g.,
India etc).

2324-1626
In Confidence
5

•  International: New Zealand as a small country needs to exploit international partnerships
in both research and innovation (including access to capital). International science funding
is largely ad hoc and not co-ordinated across government to assist diplomatically.
Function, scope, and approach
Function
5.  The purpose of the Group is to provide strategic recommendations to MBIE on options to
improve the effectiveness and impact of New Zealand’s science, innovation, and technology
system, as informed by the aspirations and systemic challenges described above.
Scope
6.  Except where noted below, the Group may consider any matters within New Zealand science,
ACT 1982
innovation and technology system that are relevant to the completion of its reports.

7.  The following areas are out of scope:
•  The Research and Development Tax Incentive, as a statutory independent evaluation is
mandated by Parliament for the coming calendar year.
•  The planned Biotechnology Regulator, given the highly specific and technical issues
involved.
INFORMATION

8.  The Group will be connected to, but is not responsible for, a parallel review into aspects of
higher education including the future of the Performance-Based Research Fund and related
incentive structures.

9.  The Group is not required to produce fully costed options or completely detail any structural
arrangements necessary to achieve the recommendations presented.
Approach
10. The work of the Group will proceed in two phases.   The first phase will be completed by
31 May 2024, the second by 30 October 2024.

11. Phase 1 will determine a set of principles, provide preliminary advice on the topics of focus as
set out below, and recommendations that can be actioned in the near term and without major
structural changes.

12. Phase 2 will continue to address the topics of focus but provide final recommendations and
longer-term changes that would ensure the effective operation of the system in coming
decades.

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Topics of focus
The Group will provide advice on the following topics of focus.
Institutions
•  What are the appropriate functions, scopes and structures of Crown Research Institutes and
other Crown-owned research organisations to ensure they are better placed to deliver impact
for New Zealand?

2324-1626
In Confidence
6

•  What is needed to effectively deliver science services of ongoing importance to New Zealand,
such as national monitoring systems for weather and geohazards, national surveys, national
databases and collections.
•  How can the contributions of universities to research be strengthened within the overall
science system?

Funding
•  What sort of mechanisms could be established to identify funding priorities?
•  What could be done to improve the effectiveness of our funding mechanisms?
•  How can the funding system better serve under-represented and under-served communities,
such as Māori and Pacific Peoples and increase diversity within the science, innovation, and
ACT 1982
technology workforce?
•  What is an appropriate balance of funding between:
o  Areas of system importance? For example, competitions, short versus longer term
contracts, institutions, workforce initiatives, infrastructure, and commercialisation.
o  Areas of national importance? For example, sectors, science disciplines, wicked
problems.
Advanced technology and commercialisation
INFORMATION
•  What form should Government’s investments in advanced technology take?
•  How can we strengthen and grow commercialisation pathways?
•  How can we strengthen our ability to take advantage of opportunities around eResearch?  This
should consider the future of our High-Performance Computing infrastructure and the role of
artificial intelligence.
•  How can we improve the role and function of Callaghan Innovation? What role and function do
industry, incubators, and other government agencies (e.g., NZTE) play in this?
Government as a commissioner, funder, and user of science
•  How can Government most effectively prioritise and commission science where it is the main
user of the outputs?
•  How could public funders of science, innovation and technology be best configured?
Workforce and connectedness
•  What is needed to ensure we are developing a science, innovation and technology workforce
that will meet our future needs and challenges?
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
•  How can opportunities and solutions for Mātauranga be better realised within the system?
•  What is needed to deliver greater diversity with the science, innovation and technology
workforce, and participation of under-represented and under-served groups such as Māori and
Pacific Peoples?
•  How can we grow key international linkages and strengthening the role of science in
diplomacy?

2324-1626
In Confidence
7

•  How can we lift awareness and appreciation of the role and impact science, innovation and
technology have on the economy, society, and environment?
•  How can we develop better connectedness with the higher education system?

13. The Group is not limited by these topics and questions and may provide advice on other
matters it sees fit.

14. The review will include but is not limited to document reviews, stakeholder and expert
consultation and input (including internationally), site visits and data analysis.

15. MBIE or the Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology may seek advice from the Group
about other questions or proposals as needed.
ACT 1982
Administration
Membership
16. The Group will be chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman. Members will collectively bring
diverse backgrounds and bring expertise in science, research, innovation, technology,
mātauranga, policy, and stakeholder engagement.

17. Members are appointed:
•
INFORMATION
  as individuals and expected to provide impartial advice.
•  until 30 October 2024, but may be extended if agreed by the Chair and MBIE.
Meeting frequency
18. The group will meet (either in person or virtually) at a frequency determined by the Chair and
agreed by MBIE.  Other work (including site visit, workshops or similar) and meetings may be
required in person of all or some members between meetings of the Group.
Reporting
19. The group will report at a frequency determined by the Chair and agreed with MBIE.
Timeline
20. The timeline for key deliverables is:
Deliverable
Completed by
Members appointed and Terms of Reference approved
31 Jan 2024
Group announced
Late Feb 2024
Phase 1 report provided to MBIE
31 May 2024
RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
Phase 2 report provided to MBIE
30 Oct 2024

2324-1626
In Confidence
8

Conflicts of Interest
21. Members should be aware of all actual, perceived, and potential conflicts of interest and notify
the Chair before any meeting. The Secretariat will maintain a register of notified conflicts.

22. If any conflicts of interest should arise during the term of the Group, the Chair is responsible for
determining mitigations to address them.
Secretariat
23. Secretariat support will be overseen by the Chair and provided by Koi Tū: The Centre for
Informed Futures.
Remuneration.
24. Renumeration will not be paid to members who are employees of government agencies listed
ACT 1982
in Schedule 2 of the Public Service Act 2020. Their employer is responsible for meeting all
costs associated with their membership on the Group.

25. All other members are entitled to compensation per day of meeting or other work agreed by the
Chair and MBIE. Remuneration will be set according to guidance set out in Cabinet Office
Circular CO(22)2: Revised Fees Framework for members appointed to bodies in which the
Crown has an interest. Travel and accommodation will be booked for and paid through Koi Tū:
The Centre for Informed Futures.
Funding
INFORMATION
26. MBIE will fund Koi Tū: The Centre for Informed Futures to provide secretariat support for the
Group.

27. Other cost-generating activities will be agreed by the Chair and MBIE before the costs are
incurred.

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL

2324-1626
In Confidence
9