Our ref
CASE-018968
Contact
Abbas Hakimi
14 January 2025
Lance Lavery
fyi-request-29285-
[email address]
Tēnā koe Lance
Your request for information regarding the Ombudsman’s involvement in Police
identification issues
I refer to your correspondence of 22 November 2024, in which you request information about the
Ombudsman’s involvement or oversight concerning issues of police constable identification, and
in particular, cases involving police constables refusing to identify themselves when interacting
with members of the public.
As you are aware, the Ombudsman is not subject to either the Official Information Act 1982 or the
Privacy Act 2020. However, the Ombudsman does endeavour to act in a manner consistent with
the spirit of those Acts, to the extent this is possible and appropriate, and subject to the
Ombudsman’s statutory secrecy and confidentiality requirements.
The Ombudsman does not investigate Police conduct
The Ombudsman does not have authority, under the Ombudsmen Act 1975, to investigate
complaints about the conduct of Police, including issues concerning police identifying themselves.
It is also not generally part of the Ombudsman’s role to provide advice to Police or other agencies
in relation to Police operational matters or conduct.
Complaints and concerns about Police conduct are dealt with by the Independent Police Conduct
Authority (IPCA). You may wish to address your request to the IPCA.
Accessing information about Police employees under the OIA
You also queried whether the Ombudsman has provided ‘
any guidance, recommendations, or
rulings regarding police officer accountability and transparency, particularly concerning their
obligation to identify themselves’.
While I understand your query relates to the conduct of police constables interacting with
members of the public in person, the Ombudsman has published a
guide to requesting the
‘Names and contact details of public sector employees’ under the Official Information Act 1982
(OIA).
You may also be interested in
this published case note, concerning the Ombudsman’s
investigation into Police’s refusal of a request for names and addresses of two police officers. In
Office of the Ombudsman | Tari o te Kaitiaki Mana Tangata
the circumstances of that particular case, the Ombudsman considered Police were entitled to
withhold the identities of the police officers.
While the Ombudsman is unable to assist further, I hope the above is helpful in clarifying matters.
Nāku noa, nā
Tom Nelson
Principal Advisor
Page
2