This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Minutes - Te Tauihu Councils'.


 
 
Ref:  SR2330105 
 
 
 
Civic House, 110 Trafalgar Street 
 
PO Box 645, Nelson 7040, New Zealand 
5 September 2023 
P (03) 546 0200 
E [email address] 
nelson.govt.nz 
Alan Riley  
C/- FYI.org 
[FYI request #23528 email]  
Dear Alan 
OFFICIAL INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MAYORS 
I refer to your official information request dated 18 July 2023: 
In a recent Governance and Administration Select Committee submission, the Mayor 
referenced "the minutes of a meeting on Monday 1st May of the three Mayors and three Chief 
Executives" (in reference to the Nelson, Tasman and Marlborough Councils). I would like to 
request a copy in full of these minutes. 
In addition, I would like to request a copy of any meeting minutes or notes of meetings 
between two or more of the three Council Mayors this year (2023). 
In addition, I would like to request a copy of any correspondence (email or letter) between two 
or more of the three Council Mayors this year (2023). 
 
For the purposes of clarity in responding, your request has been broken down into parts as 
follows: 
•  Part 1 – minutes of meeting 1 May 2023  
•  Part 2 – minutes of any other meetings of the three Mayors of the Nelson, Tasman and 
Marlborough Councils in 2023 to date of request  
•  Part 3a – emails between two or more of the three Mayors of the Nelson, Tasman and 
Marlborough Councils in 2023 to date of request 
•  Part 3b – letters between two or more of the three Mayors of the Nelson, Tasman and 
Marlborough Councils in 2023 to date of request 
Part 1 
Although no formal minutes were taken of the meeting that took place on 1 May 2023, notes 
were kept. These are enclosed in full below. 
 
 
 
Internal Document ID:  

 
Part 2 
No other minutes or notes are held from meetings between the mayors for this calendar year 
to date. Therefore, we must refuse this part of your request under section 17(g) of the Local 
Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA). 
 
Part 3a  
The collated emails between any of the three mayors within the relevant timeframe are 
enclosed below, noting that some information has been withheld at this time under the 
following sections of LGOIMA: 
Section 7(2)(a) 
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased 
natural persons 
Section 7(2)(c)(i)   to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence 
where the making available of the information would be likely to 
prejudice the supply of similar information, or information from the same 
source, and it is in the public interest that such information should 
continue to be supplied 
Section 7(2)(f)(i)  
to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and 
frank expression of opinions by or between or to members or officers or 
employees of any local authority in the course of their duty 
The reasons for withholding have been weighed against the public interest and found to be 
stronger.   Redactions are shown with red on black overlay text on the attached PDF 
document. 
Please also note that emails within a conversation thread that are out of scope for your request 
(being between people other than the three mayors) have not been provided.  
 
Part 3b 
Two letters are pertinent to your request and have been provided in the attached PDF 
document.  
You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of this response. 
Information about how to make a complaint is available at www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or 
Freephone 0800 802 602. 
 
 
 
Page 2 of 3 


 
If you wish to discuss this decision with us, please feel free to contact [email address]. 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
Devorah Nícuarta-Smith   
Manager Governance and Support Services   
 
Encl:   Combined PDF document, comprising: 
•  Meeting notes 1 May 2023 
•  Collated emails 
•  Collated letters  
 
 
Page 3 of 3 

Part 1  
Notes from meeting of Mayors - 1 May 2023 
Original sent by email – included in collated results to part 3a of request 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
At a meeting today of Nelson City, Marlborough and Tasman District Council Mayors and 
Chief Executives the following was agreed. 
1.  There is a desire to take coordinated regional leadership around changes to 
Water Infrastructure noting the political uncertainty of an election later this 
year. 
2.  There is an opportunity to transition earlier than the final date of 1 July 2026, 
and early engagement with the NTU should occur to commence this discussion. 
3.  Noting political uncertainty, the group agrees that the positions outlined to the 
Minister of Local Government prior to the Affordable Water Infrastructure 
announcements remain the shared position i.e. the benefits of a combined 
water infrastructure operating model and strong regional representation, the 
concerns that dissecting the boundaries of Tasman and Marlborough districts 
fails to reflect the communities of interest, the request for the exclusion of 
Nelmac in the asset transfer, and the support for iwi participation but not a 
legislative requirement for 50% representation. We agreed not to diverge from 
this view without discussion amongst the Transition Group outlined below. 
4.  Approval from each full Council will be sought to establish a Te Tauihu Council 
Water Infrastructure Transition Group comprising membership of the three 
Mayors and CEOs. We will collectively draft a single resolution to be used for 
each council’s separate approval. The purpose of the group will be to work 
closely in a coordinated way to lead Water Infrastructure changes for Te Tauihu 
5.  Early discussions should commence with the NTU who will be invited to the first 
meeting of the Te Tauihu Council Water Infrastructure Transition Group (subject 
to approval by the three Councils) to examine the opportunities of early 
transition. 
6.  Once guidance from the NTU is received the group wil  seek at the earliest 
opportunity a hui with iwi to invite a dialogue around iwi participation. 
7.  Group meetings are expected to be 6 weekly. 

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
[email address]
Subject:
Fwd: Three Waters Mayoral Declaration
Date:
Saturday, 21 January 2023 6:29:42 pm
s.7(2)(c) LGOIMA - subject to an obligation of confidence, Attachment Withheld
Attachments:
Three Waters Mayoral Declaration FINAL 17.01.23.pdf
This is the Mayoral Dec on 3 waters we discussed at cricket. Latest word on Friday was 48
Mayors were on board in including auck and chch. Most Mayors are not involving
Councillors in decision but have chosen to consult with most indicating support. Deadline
for decision is this Wed. Happy to discuss further.
Nick
Get Outlook for iOS


From:
Mayor Nadine Taylor
To:
"Mayor Janet Holborow"; Campbell Barry; [email address]; Anita Baker; Wayne Guppy; Daran
Ponter – Chair; [email address]; [email address]; Gary Caffell;
[email address]; Grant C Smith; [email address]; [email address];
[email address]; [email address]; Rehette Stotlz ([email address]); Mayor
Nick Smith; Tim King; [email address]; [email address]; [email address]
Cc:
s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons
Subject:
RE: Reconnect zoom meeting - Entity C Councils
Date:
Monday, 30 January 2023 3:25:47 pm
Attachments:
image001.jpg
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.
Thanks for suggesting, Campbell.
As one of the new recruits it’d be great to connect with Entity C Mayors and helpful to hear
more about C’s collective approach.
Ngā mihi mahana
Nadine
Nadine Taylor
Mayor
image002.jpg
Te Kaunihera ā-Rohe o Wairau
Tel: 03 520 7400 I [mobile number]
15 Seymour Street, PO Box 443
Blenheim 7240, New Zealand
[email address]
www.marlborough.govt.nz


From:
Mayor Nadine Taylor
To:
Robyn Scherer; Mayor Nick Smith; Nadine Taylor
Cc:
Kelsey McLean; Sarah Woodhouse-8607; Wouter Woortman
Subject:
RE: Three waters submission - one voice
Date:
Thursday, 9 February 2023 6:44:58 pm
Attachments:
image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.png
image004.png
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.
Thanks Robyn, I’m happy in principle. We will need te tau ihu Iwi Chairs to approve again as they
are also signatories.
The Chair of Ngāti Kuia has changed since the last letter so it may need to be reviewed with the
new Chair and the signature updated.
Thanks
Nadine
Nadine Taylor
Mayor
Te Kaunihera ā-Rohe o Wairau
Tel:  03 520 7400 I [mobile number]
15 Seymour Street, PO Box 443
Blenheim 7240, New Zealand
[email address]
www.marlborough.govt.nz

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Tim King; s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA 

- protect p "Rachel Boyack"
   
 
; [email address]
Cc:
s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons
Subject:
RE: CITB Trustee Applications 2021
Date:
Tuesday, 28 February 2023 12:51:00 pm
Attachments:
image002.jpg
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Tim,
Happy with process to readvertise role. Keen for us to keep scientific skill set up and for us to be
bringing on a new generation of Trustees for the Cawthron.
Nick
From: Robyn Scherer <[email address]> On Behalf Of Tim King
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2023 9:59 am
To: s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons 'Rachel Boyack'
<[email address]>; [email address]
Cc: s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons Mayor Nick Smith <[email address]>; 7(2)(a)
s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons
Subject: RE: CITB Trustee Applications 2021
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the
sender and know the content is safe.
Morena s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - prot        
I had a chat with Rachel Boyack this morning having reviewed the previous applications. We both
believe that the best course of action would be to readvertise the role. One bit of information that
we would like is regarding the current six non-statutory trustees backgrounds/areas of expertise
to ensure that we have the requirement for three of them to have the scientific background
covered. I understand that s.7(2)(a) LG is now away so we will need to catch up on 
   
 
   
 
7(2)(a)  return to
determine the next steps.
Nick/7(2)(a)
 – your feedback on this plan of action would be appreciated.
Regards
Tim King

Robyn Scherer
Executive Assistant & Advisor to the Mayor
DDI +64 3 543 8512  |  Mobile +64 27 278 9766  |  [email address]
Private Bag 4, Richmond 7050, NZ





From:
Tim King
To:
Rachel Boyack; Mayor Nick Smith
Cc:
Rosalie Grant
Subject:
Re: Hill St Richmond residents
Date:
Wednesday, 15 March 2023 10:07:33 pm
Attachments:
image001.jpg
image475453.jpg
image390161.png
image625309.png
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.
Evening all
Thanks Nick, sounds like a pragmatic way forward in the circumstances.
Tim
Get Outlook for iOS

Tim King
Koromatua
Mayor
DDI+64 (27) 2448202| Mobile+64 27 244 8202| [email address]
Private Bag 4, Richmond 7050, NZ
This e-mail message and any attached files may contain confidential information, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete

From: Mayor Nick Smith <[email address]> 
Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2023 9:07 PM
To: Rachel Boyack <[email address]>; [email address]
Cc: Rosalie Grant <[email address]>
Subject: Re: Hill St Richmond residents
Rachel,


I will get on to it tomorrow. The navigators are NCC funded with a 25% grant from Govt but we
just need to be pragmatic and get them support they need. There are insufficient cases in TDC to
justify setting up a service. Admin would cost more than just getting them access.
Nick
Get Outlook for iOS
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the
sender and know the content is safe.

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
[email address]
Cc:
Councillors; Lindsay McKenzie; Nigel Philpott; [email address]; Nadine Taylor
Subject:
Three Waters
Date:
Friday, 31 March 2023 6:02:32 pm
Attachments:
3 Waters Letter to Minister 31st March 2023.docx
Kia Ora Minister,
Please find attached further feedback following our meeting last week and an informal
discussion of Council today on potential alternative options. It is important to note that Council
has not had sufficient time to fully analyse the different options nor consider them as part of our
formal meetings.
The process is less than ideal, but we note your tight timetable and wanted to provide some
guidance on our Councils view. We would welcome further opportunity to engage on this
important issue for our community.
Nga mihi nui,
Nick Smith

Hon Keirin McAlnulty, 
Minister of Local Government, 
Parliament Buildings, 
WELLINGTON. 
Kia Ora Minister, 
Further to our meeting last week by Zoom of the three Te Tauiho Mayors and 
Chief Executives, I have had the opportunity to have a further dialogue with 
Nelson City Councillors on the new options being considered of a greater 
number of water entities under the Three Waters Reform. 
There is a consensus of all elected members in respect of the recent issue that 
has arisen over Nelmac, our Council controlled contracting company. The 
Transition Unit recently indicated they wished to acquire (without any 
compensation) the water services assets and staff of this business. We are 
unanimous in our opposition to this and seek at the earliest possible 
opportunity this being taken off the table due to the significant uncertainty 
and harm this is doing to this trading entity and its staff. 
We have previously written jointly with our two neighbouring Councils and 
eight Te Tauihu iwi indicating that, if the reform is to proceed and the 
Government is insisting on four entities, for us to be included with the rest of 
the South Island in proposed Entity D.  We are disappointed at your message 
that this is not being considered in the reset due to the opposition of Ngai 
Tahu. 
I must note that a significant number of Nelson City Councillors have lost 
confidence in the Government over the three waters reform and did not wish 
to express any preference on the question of the number of entities and 
alternative configurations.  They are concerned that the process is poor and 
has become an exercise in trying to resolve a political problem for the 
Government in the run up to the election rather than finding the right answer 
for the future of three waters management into the future for our community. 
These Councillors are particularly aggrieved at the Government developing 
the policy on an assurance that it would be voluntary, assuring NZers this 
would be the case at the 2020 General Election and then afterwards 
significantly changing the policy to making it compulsory for Councils. These 
Councillors also believe the Government has misrepresented Council’s 
performance in managing water infrastructure particularly as it relates to 
Nelson where we are proud of our track record.  The taking of $750 million of 
water infrastructure assets from our Council (that has associated debt of $70 
million) and then providing $20 million in compensation as “Better Off” 
funding has also compounded the distrust. They are concerned that in 
expressing any view over alternative geographic options that this will be 
misinterpreted as support when they are strongly opposed. 
3 Waters Letter to Minister 31st March 2023  31/07/2023 4:34 pm 
Page 1 of 2 

A majority of the Council prefer a Te Tauihu Entity over being part of Entity C. 
This is due to us having a greater community of interest with Tasman and 
Marlborough as compared to Wellington. There is also a view that the 
opportunity for Nelson input into a Te Tauihu is significantly greater than a far 
larger entity. This view is also influenced by scepticism that the economies of 
scale relied upon in the Three Waters economic modelling are not as great as 
assumed. One of our 12 Councillors still favours staying as part of Entity C. 
It is important to note that this issue of the number and size of entities 
addresses only a part of the Nelson City Council’s concerns over the 
Government’s proposals on Three Waters. We remain of the view that 
stormwater should not be included as it comprises the integrated catchment 
management of flood management that unitary Councils like Nelson do well. 
We also wish the reforms to recognise these are ratepayer funded assets that 
should remain in the ownership of Council and that there needs to be proper 
accountability back to elected representatives. We restate our more detailed 
concerns provided in our recent submission to the Finance and Expenditure 
Select Committee. 
Nga mihi nui, 
Hon Dr Nick Smith. 
Mayor Of Nelson. 
3 Waters Letter to Minister 31st March 2023  31/07/2023 4:34 pm 
Page 2 of 2 


From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Lindsay McKenzie; [email address]; Mayor Nadine Taylor; [email address];
[email address]; Lindsay McKenzie
Cc:
Robyn Scherer; Andi Houston; Sarah Woodhouse-8607; Paula Dempsey
Subject:
Draft for discussion at 7pm meeting
Date:
Tuesday, 21 March 2023 4:48:00 pm
Attachments:
image001.png
s.7(2)(f)(i) - free and frank opinions, s.7(2)(c) LGOIMA - subject to an obligation of confidence
Attachment Withheld
Kia ora koutou
Please see attached draft for discussion at 7pm Zoom meeting that is scheduled to
discuss three waters positioning.
Ngā mihi
Hon Dr Nick Smith
Mayor of Nelson
Nelson City Council | Te Kaunihera o Whakatū
P 03 265 5637
www.nelson.govt.nz

s.7(2)(c) LGOIMA - subject to an obligation of confidence, s.7(2)(f)(i) - free and frank opinions
9a Three waters potential common lines 
31/07/2023 4:39 pm 
Page 1 of 1 

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Lindsay McKenzie; [email address]; Mayor Nadine Taylor; [email address];
[email address]
Cc:
Robyn Scherer; Andi Houston; Kelsey McLean; Sarah Woodhouse-8607
Subject:
Revised common positions
Date:
Wednesday, 22 March 2023 9:07:00 am
Attachments:
s.7(2)(c) LGOIMA - subject to an obligation of confidence, s.7(2)(f)(i) - free and frank opinions
Attachment Withheld
Good morning
Please find attached revised common positions following last night’s Zoom session.
I welcome any comments.
Kind regards,
Hon Dr Nick Smith
Mayor of Nelson
Nelson City Council | Te Kaunihera o Whakatū
P 03 265 5637
www.nelson.govt.nz

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Eve Lucinsky; K McAnulty (MIN)
Cc:
Janine Dowding; [email address]; Lindsay McKenzie; Mayor Nadine Taylor;
[email address]
Subject:
In confidence - common positions for Te Tauihu Mayors for Three Waters meeting today
Date:
Wednesday, 22 March 2023 4:02:00 pm
Attachments:
Final version Three Waters common positions.pdf
Dear Minister
 
Please find attached the common positions for the Mayors of Marlborough, Nelson and Tasman
in respect of the Three Waters meeting with you today.
 
 
Nāku iti noa, nā
 
Hon Dr Nick Smith
Mayor of Nelson
Nelson City Council | Te Kaunihera o Whakatū
P 03 265 5637
www.nelson.govt.nz
 
 

Common positions for Mayors of Marlborough, Nelson and Tasman in respect 
of Three Waters meeting with Minister, Wednesday 22 March 
 
1.  The new water entities need to have more direct accountability to 
ratepayers and councils. We favour a model where the elected councils 
appoint the directors and have oversight of performance through letters 
of expectation and statements of intent as well as half and full-year 
financial and non-financial reporting. 
2.  We support iwi participation on the water entities but not a legislative 
requirement for 50% representation. The diversity of iwi across New 
Zealand requires flexibility in the way in which their voices are included 
in the water entities structure. We favour a model more like that in the 
Natural and Built Environment Bill. 
3.  Nelmac should be treated no differently to privately owned water 
services companies. Their inclusion in the asset transfer is unfair to 
councils that have retained ownership. Including them will 
unnecessarily complicate the role of the new water entities. 
4.  Water entity boundaries should be determined on the basis of 
communities of interest, water catchments and existing water networks 
and not subdivide existing territorial authorities. The current proposal 
bisects the Tasman and Marlborough districts. 
5.  If the proposed 4 water-entity model remains, all three councils wish to 
be part of South Island Entity D. This position was reinforced in a letter 
to Ministers endorsed by the eight Te Tauihu iwi. We would be open to 
a greater number of water entities, albeit further work is required on 
the optimum number and appropriate boundaries. Any future structure 
must ensure equity of costs between entities and financial 
sustainability. 
 
 
 
 
 
In confidence not Council policy  
 
 
 
 
 


From:
Rebecca Waldron-5173 on behalf of Mayor Nadine Taylor
To:
[email address]; Mayor Nick Smith
Subject:
Letter - Minister McAnulty - Three Waters Reform Potential Amendments
Date:
Friday, 31 March 2023 3:52:50 pm
Attachments:
image001.jpg
Three Waters Reform - Potential Amendments letter from Mayor Taylor.pdf
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.
Kia ora  Mayor King and Mayor Smith
Please find attached a letter that has been sent to Minister McAnulty from Mayor Taylor this
afternoon.
Ngā mihi
Bec Waldron
Executive Assistant to Chief Executive
MDCOMBLUERGB
Phone:   03 520 7400
[mobile number]
15 Seymour Street, PO Box 443
Blenheim 7240, New Zealand
[email address]
www.marlborough.govt.nz
This email, including any attachments, is confidential and may contain legally privileged material and is only
for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient then any use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
notify us immediately and delete the original message. This email does not necessarily represent the views of
the Marlborough District Council. Thank you.


MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL 
TELEPHONE (0064) 3 520 7400 
15  SEYMOUR STREET 
FACSIMILE    (0064) 3 520 7496 
PO BOX 443, BLENHEIM  7240 
EMAIL [email address] 
NEW ZEALAND 
WEB www.marlborough.govt.nz
31  March 2023 
Record No: 
2360918 
File Ref: 
D050-007-001-01, 
W400-011-01 
Hon. Kieran McAnulty 
Ask for: 
Mayor Taylor 
Minister of  Local Government 
Private Bag 18041 
Parliament Buildings 
Wellington 6160 
[email address]
Dear  Minister 
Three Waters Reform - Potential Amendments
Thank  you f or including Te  Tauihu  unitary  councils, including Marlborough, in  last week’s discussion of  
potential amendments  to the current  Three  Waters  ref orm proposals.  
It was made clear in your discussion slides that the Government’s intention is to continue the ref orms but 
to also consider changes which  might achieve  three  key priorities: 
1.
Strengthen the links between councils and entities;
2.
Ensure  that water service entities and councils have f inancial independence to invest in the things
they need to; and
3.
‘No district is lef t behind.’
You also made it clear  that several of  the common positions the three  Te  Tauihu  Mayors agreed on were 
likely to be unacceptable, these being: 
1.
Any representation  proposals which did not maintain  balance sheet separation;
2.
The  inclusion of  Te Tauihu  councils in Entity D.
Your position on these two key aspects of  the Te  Tauihu  position limits the options f or changes to 
increasing the number of  entities, thus providing the opportunity f or more direct representation  on 
Regional Representative  Committees than we currently have. 
Unf ortunately, the projected $2,051  average  household cost of  a Te  Tauihu  entity as provided by 
DIA of f icials (Attachment 1) becomes $3,150  per annum,  signif icantly up f rom the $1,360  modelled f or 
Entity C. 
Marlborough District Council (MDC) has always accepted the need f or some type of  ref orm but 
recognises the very challenging magnitude of  f uture three waters  investment required both to address 
current  water  quality and capacity challenges and particularly the f uture need to invest in climate change 
resilience.  Our communities, and Māori in particular, have  high expectations to greatly enhance  ef f luent
and stormwater  discharge quality, which will be very expensive. These  are massive challenges.  
That  means a Te Tauihu entity is not supported by MDC on the grounds of  af f ordability.  If  Government 
does increase  the number  of  entities, we believe a cost equalisation mechanism  across all entities must 
be implemented.  This  was a key element and benef it of  the ref orm proposals. 
If  we are theref ore stuck with Entity C, our issue has always  been ensuring Marlborough has a strong 
voice in determining the  priority capital investments of  the new entity.  We f ear that Marlborough’s 
three  waters investment will f all behind and the much larger Wellington City and surrounding urban 
councils such as Hutt Valley, Porirua and the Kapiti Coast, with their much greater residential land 
demands, will dominate f uture investments.  MDC’s submissions to the Water  Services Entities and 
Water  Services Legislation Bills have consistently expressed our concern about loss of  local democratic 
inf luence and lack of  consideration of  alternative models which  could mitigate that.  


Three  Waters Reform  - Potential Amendments 
MDC may not be represented on the Regional Representative Group. The Regional Advisory Panels also 
dilute our inf luence because they are Te Tauihu-wide.  This  is our most signif icant concern and because 
of  that our community is adamantly  opposed to the new system to a large degree. 
We  suggest that Government  could still counter those f ears through strong direction f rom its 
Government  Policy Statement (GPS) on Three  Waters.  The  GPS needs to insist that all council growth 
requirements  be given equal weight by the water  entities.  The  entities in turn need to be structured so 
that individual councils can have  access to entity local and senior management at all times, to be able  to 
move quickly and f lexibly if  local development opportunities arise.   
A recent example  f or MDC was a proposal f rom a major retirement  village company to build a large 
village on the periphery  of  Blenheim’s urban residential area.  The village will provide the equivalent of  
over 300  houses and so is of  signif icant benef it to the region’s housing challenges.  The  inf rastructure 
necessary  was problematic being some years  away in  our Long-Term  Plan.  There  were adjoining private 
landowner  dif f iculties in providing three waters  service access.  MDC was  able to work with the retirement 
village, amend  our three  waters  priorities and get the development underway  with some smart 
engineering.   
To support such local devolvement and input, councils will need  ongoing three waters  knowledge and 
experience  within  its staf f .  Such staf f will need to act as the key liaison people with the  entity staf f , 
identif ying community issues, contributing to land use planning, assisting senior council staf f  and 
councillors to understand entity proposals and ensuring a strong link between the entity and council’s 
long term planning. We  believe f unding f or this should come f rom either the Government or the 
Three  Waters entities. 
In summary, Marlborough District Council: 
1.
Is disappointed that we cannot join Entity D at this point and would like f urther consideration to be
given to this.
2.
Does not f avour a smaller  entity across Te  Tauihu  on af f ordability grounds, unless a cross entity
cost equalisation mechanism  is implemented.
3.
If  we  cannot join Entity D and smaller  councils cannot be assured  that cost equalisation will be
provided, our next pref erence  is to remain  in Entity C.
4.
Seeks Government  support f or much stronger directives to the new  entities to engage regularly and
directly with local councils at both staf f  and governance levels
5.
Seeks Government  support f or a f lexible and responsive approach to f uture development
opportunities with equal weight given to councils of  all sizes
6.
Believes that Government  or the new  entities should f und local council three  waters expertise on
an  ongoing basis.
Thank  you f or the opportunity to provide input into your decision making. 
Yours sincerely 
NADINE TAYLOR 
MAYOR 
Encl 
Copy to: 
Hamiora Bowkett, Executive Director, Three  Waters  Ref orm, DIA 
MDC Councillors 
Mark Wheeler,  Chief  Executive 
Martin Fletcher  Chief  Financial Of f icer 
Richard  Coningham, Manager  Assets and Services 
Page 2

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Mayor Nadine Taylor; [email address]
Cc:
[email address]; Mark Wheeler-5030; Nigel Philpott
Subject:
Re: Notes from the meeting yesterday
Date:
Wednesday, 3 May 2023 10:09:40 pm
Dear Nadine,
s.7(2)(f)(i) - free and frank opinions
Yours sincerely,
Nick
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Mayor Nadine Taylor <[email address]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:18:11 PM
To: [email address] <[email address]>
Cc: [email address] <[email address]>; Mayor Nick Smith
<[email address]>; Mark Wheeler-5030 <[email address]>; Nigel Philpott
<[email address]>
Subject: Re: Notes from the meeting yesterday
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and
know the content is safe.
Janine thank you for these notes which are spot-on.
s.7(2)(f)(i) - free and frank opinions

s.7(2)(f)(i) - free and frank opinions
Nadine 
Sent from my iPad
On 2/05/2023, at 7:36 AM, Janine Dowding <[email address]>
wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender
and know the content is safe.
At a meeting today of Nelson City, Marlborough and Tasman District Council Mayors and
Chief Executives the following was agreed.
1. There is a desire to take coordinated regional leadership around changes to Water
Infrastructure noting the political uncertainty of an election later this year.
2. There is an opportunity to transition earlier than the final date of 1 July 2026, and
early engagement with the NTU should occur to commence this discussion.
3. Noting political uncertainty, the group agrees that the positions outlined to the
Minister of Local Government prior to the Affordable Water Infrastructure
announcements remain the shared position i.e. the benefits of a combined water
infrastructure operating model and strong regional representation, the concerns
that dissecting the boundaries of Tasman and Marlborough districts fails to reflect
the communities of interest, the request for the exclusion of Nelmac in the asset
transfer, and the support for iwi participation but not a legislative requirement for
50% representation.  We agreed not to diverge from this view without discussion
amongst the Transition Group outlined below.
4. Approval from each full Council will be sought to establish a Te Tauihu Council Water
Infrastructure Transition Group comprising membership of the three Mayors and
CEOs. We will collectively draft a single resolution to be used for each council’s
separate approval.  The purpose of the group will be to work closely in a coordinated
way to lead Water Infrastructure changes for Te Tauihu
5. Early discussions should commence with the NTU who will be invited to the first
meeting of the  Te Tauihu Council Water Infrastructure Transition Group (subject to
approval by the three Councils) to examine the opportunities of early transition.
6. Once guidance from the NTU is received the group will seek at the earliest
opportunity a hui with iwi to invite a dialogue around iwi participation.
7. Group meetings are expected to be 6 weekly.
Ngā mihi
Janine

Janine Dowding

Tumu Whakarae
Chief Executive Officer
DDI +64 3 543 8455  |  [email address]
Private Bag 4, Richmond 7050, NZ
This e-mail message and any attached files may contain confidential information, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete

This email, including any attachments, is confidential and may contain legally privileged material and is only for the use
of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient then any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately and delete the
original message. This email does not necessarily represent the views of the Marlborough District Council. Thank you.




From:
Robyn Scherer on behalf of Tim King
To:
Robyn Scherer
Subject:
Overseas on leave - 6 June to 12 July 2023
Date:
Tuesday, 30 May 2023 11:36:09 am
Attachments:
image880803.jpg
image467651.png
image777847.png
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.
Kia ora
I am overseas on leave from 6 June 2023 until 11 July 2023.
Deputy Mayor, Stuart Bryant will be Acting Mayor while I am away.
My Executive Assistant, Robyn Scherer will be supporting Stuart during my absence.
You can connect to Robyn via email – [email address] or cell phone –
027 2789 766
Ngā mihi
Tim King 

Robyn Scherer
Executive Assistant & Advisor to the Mayor
DDI +64 3 543 8512  |  Mobile +64 27 278 9766  |  [email address]
Private Bag 4, Richmond 7050, NZ
This e-mail message and any attached files may contain confidential information, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete




From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Tim King; [email address]; [email address]
Cc:
Nigel Philpott; Mark Wheeler ([email address])
Subject:
Re: Draft letter re Affordable Water Reforms
Date:
Wednesday, 31 May 2023 12:32:26 pm
Attachments:
image229894.jpg
image346465.png
image865321.png
Dear Janine,
I did not agree that our letter to Minister McAlnulty propose a membership for the steering
group membership along the lines you have proposed. Quite to the contrary, I stated a
number of times that I did not wish to set any precedent on this quite divisive issue until
after the General Election when Government policy would become more settled. I suggest
replacing the sentence after NTU with “ The purpose of the steering group should be
focused on the operational challenges of establishing a Te Tauihu water entity and we
suggest representation comprising of CEOs and Infrastructure Managers from each Council.
 Our Councils are cautious of committing to any particularly model for governance when
there will be significant political uncertainty over this until after the General Election.” The
subtle but important difference is not setting a precedent on representation. The ownership
of the steering group is also then with the NTU not Councils.
I also wish to push for us each doing as we committed in note 4 of your notes from May 1st
- that is formalising our Water Infrastructure Tranistion Group by Council resolution. This
provides an important balance to the steering group. I would be happy for us to note that the
makeup of this transition group will be reviewed after the General Election so as to take into
account the future direction of water policy.
Nigel and I are less enthusiastic about pressing ahead with the NTU work but in the
interests of compromise and moving ahead feel this is a constructive way forward. It
provides the balance of the steering group getting and doing some early work while
delivering on what we agreed early in May.
Yours sincerely,
Nick
Get Outlook for iOS
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Mayor Nadine Taylor
Subject:
Letter - 31 May 2023
Date:
Thursday, 1 June 2023 9:26:00 am
Attachments:
Letter to Mayor Nadine Taylor - Kotahitanga mo te Taiao Alliance funding - Mayor Nick Smith.pdf
Kia ora Nadine,
Please see attached letter.
Nāku iti noa, nā
Hon Dr Nick Smith
Mayor of Nelson
Nelson City Council | Te Kaunihera o Whakatū
P 03 265 5637
www.nelson.govt.nz



From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
[email address]
Cc:
Robyn Scherer
Subject:
Letter - 31 May 2023
Date:
Thursday, 1 June 2023 9:29:00 am
Attachments:
Letter to Mayor Tim King - Kotahitanga mo te Taiao Alliance funding - Mayor Nick Smith.pdf
Kia ora Tim,
 
Please see attached letter.
 
Nāku iti noa, nā
 
Hon Dr Nick Smith
Mayor of Nelson
Nelson City Council | Te Kaunihera o Whakatū
P 03 265 5637
www.nelson.govt.nz
 
 






From:
Mayor Nadine Taylor
To:
Tim King; [email address]; Mayor Nick Smith
Cc:
Nigel Philpott; Mark Wheeler-5030
Subject:
Re: Draft letter re Affordable Water Reforms
Date:
Thursday, 1 June 2023 10:20:38 am
Attachments:
image001.jpg
image002.png
image003.png
image066538.jpg
image186459.png
image238193.png
image001.jpg
image002.png
image003.png
image066538.jpg
image186459.png
image238193.png
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.
Good morning Janine,
Thank you for proposing those changes. 
I'm happy with the amended version of the letter, as circulated yesterday afternoon.
I'll arrange for my EA to provide you with my electronic signature.
Thanks
Nadine
Get Outlook for Android
From: Robyn Scherer <[email address]> on behalf of Tim King
<[email address]>
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 10:06:03 AM
To: Janine Dowding <[email address]>; Mayor Nick Smith
<[email address]>; [email address] <[email address]>
Cc: Nigel Philpott <[email address]>; Mark Wheeler
([email address]) <[email address]>
Subject: RE: Draft letter re Affordable Water Reforms
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and
know the content is safe.
Thank you Janine, I am happy with the amended letter
Tim

Robyn Scherer
Executive Assistant & Advisor to the Mayor
DDI +64 3 543 8512  |  Mobile +64 27 278 9766  |  [email address]
Private Bag 4, Richmond 7050, NZ
This e-mail message and any attached files may contain confidential information, and may be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete



From: Mayor Nick Smith <[email address]> 
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 12:32 PM
To: Tim King <[email address]>; [email address]; Janine Dowding
<[email address]>
Cc: Nigel Philpott <[email address]>; Mark Wheeler
([email address]) <[email address]>
Subject: Re: Draft letter re Affordable Water Reforms
Dear Janine,
I did not agree that our letter to Minister McAlnulty propose a membership for the steering group
membership along the lines you have proposed. Quite to the contrary, I stated a number of times
that I did not wish to set any precedent on this quite divisive issue until after the General Election
when Government policy would become more settled. I suggest replacing the sentence after NTU
with “ The purpose of the steering group should be focused on the operational challenges of
establishing a Te Tauihu water entity and we suggest representation comprising of CEOs and
Infrastructure Managers from each Council.  Our Councils are cautious of committing to any
particularly model for governance when there will be significant political uncertainty over this
until after the General Election.” The subtle but important difference is not setting a precedent on
representation. The ownership of the steering group is also then with the NTU not Councils.
I also wish to push for us each doing as we committed in note 4 of your notes from May 1st - that
is formalising our Water Infrastructure Tranistion Group by Council resolution. This provides an

important balance to the steering group. I would be happy for us to note that the makeup of this
transition group will be reviewed after the General Election so as to take into account the future
direction of water policy.
Nigel and I are less enthusiastic about pressing ahead with the NTU work but in the interests of
compromise and moving ahead feel this is a constructive way forward. It provides the balance of
the steering group getting and doing some early work while delivering on what we agreed early in
May.
Yours sincerely,
Nick
Get Outlook for iOS



From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Alec Louverdis; Tim King; [email address]; Stuart Bryant
Cc:
Stephen Rainbow; Kelsey McLean; Nigel Philpott; Janine Dowding ([email address])
Subject:
Draft Letter on Cycleways to Min of Transport
Date:
Monday, 12 June 2023 8:56:00 pm
Attachments:
cycleway letter.docx
This is a draft of the letter Tim King and I discussed regarding trying to get an extension on the
timetable for our cycleway projects.
Welcome feedback and additions. Aim is to get out by end of this week.
Nick

Hon Keiran McAlnulty, 
Acting Minister of transport, 
Parliament Buildings, 
WELLINGTON. 
Dear Minister, 
We write to respectfully request that Waka Kotahi reconsider applications by 
our two Councils for extensions of the delivery timetables for cycleway 
projects in our two regions to enable us to be able to properly consult and 
engage with the effected communities on their delivery. 
Cycleways are the easiest to build when they are incorporated from the 
beginning in new developments. They are a lot more challenging when they 
are being added into an existing urban environment. Space within the roading 
corridor is often contested and new cycleways can result in the loss of 
parking, narrowing of carriageways, changes to property entrances, impacts 
on businesses and significant debate on how best to ensure the safety of all 
road users. It is possible to overcome these problems of retrofitting cycleways 
into an existing roading layout, but it requires thorough engagement with the 
community and careful design. The danger with pushing ahead without proper 
consultation is that it alienates communities and is counterproductive to 
support for providing greater transport choices. 
The current timetable for the delivery of cycleway projects in Nelson and 
Tasman does not give sufficient time. The insistence that the projects be 
completed by June 2024 does not allow sufficient time for preliminary design, 
consultation with communities, final design, contract tendering and 
construction.  We are disappointed that our requests to Waka Kotahi for an 
extension to June 2025 has been declined and their advise that we will lose 
the funding if the projects are not completed within the year. 
A good example of the sort of project at risk is the $4 million East- West 
Cycleway in Nelson City.  This proposal will significantly add and improve the 
network of cycleways in Nelson by providing a dedicated cycleway from the 
eastern suburbs to major schools and the hospital as well as then linking to 
the main cycleways north and south. However, it is a complicated geography 
that will involve at least six roads, hundreds of homes and dozens of 
businesses. We would welcome showing the area to understand the 
complexity of the project. 
Our Councils have both become involved in controversies in recent months 
over transport initiatives in places like Pohara, Motueka, Stoke and in the City 
over changes in the roading corridor required to deliver Government transport 
priorities for cycleways and buses. These issues can be managed with careful 
and thorough consultation but not without adequate time.  We are also 
22a. cycleway letter 
31/07/2023 5:00 pm 
Page 1 of 2 

concerned about the toll on our staff from the backlash when times are 
inadequate to do these processes well. 
We are sure that you will also be ware that our region is also having to 
manage tens of millions of infrastructure repair work arising from the August 
storms last year.  This work is putting our engineering teams under huge 
pressure. The Nelson Annual Plan has us doing more infrastructural work in 
2023/24 than ever in NCC’s history and Tasman’s is similarly ambitious. 
Nelson’s incoming and new Chief Executive has advised that it is just not 
possible or reasonable to deliver these cycleway projects on this timetable as 
well as the flood repair work, and that the repair works need to take priority. 
I would welcome further engagement with your Transport or Waka Kotahi 
officials and any requests for further information.  We have copied this letter 
to our two affected electorate MPs Hon Damien O’Connor and Rachel Boyack 
to keep them informed.  We are keen to find a solution that works for the 
Government and our communities. 
Yours sincerely, 
Hon Dr Nick Smith 
Mayor of Nelson. 
Tim King 
Mayor of Tasman. 
22a. cycleway letter 
31/07/2023 5:00 pm 
Page 2 of 2 


Final letter to Hon McAnulty included for completeness
Monday 19 June 2023 
Hon Kieran McAnulty 
Acting Minister of Transport 
Parliament Buildings 
Wellington  
By email: 
Dear Minister McAnulty 
We write to respectfully request that Waka Kotahi reconsider applications by 
our two Councils for extensions of the delivery timetables for cycleway 
projects in our two regions to enable us to be able to properly consult and 
engage with the effected communities on their delivery. 
Cycleways are the easiest to build when they are incorporated from the 
beginning in new developments. They are a lot more challenging when they 
are being added into an existing urban environment. Space within the roading 
corridor is often contested and new cycleways can result in the loss of 
parking, narrowing of carriageways, changes to property entrances, impacts 
on businesses and significant debate on how best to ensure the safety of all 
road users. It is possible to overcome these problems of retrofitting cycleways 
into an existing roading layout, but it requires thorough engagement with the 
community and careful design. The danger with pushing ahead without proper 
consultation is that it alienates communities and is counterproductive to 
support for providing greater transport choices. 
The current timetable for the delivery of cycleway projects in Nelson and 
Tasman does not give sufficient time. The insistence that the projects be 
completed by June 2024 does not allow sufficient time for preliminary design, 
consultation with communities, final design, contract tendering and 
construction.  We are disappointed that our requests to Waka Kotahi for an 
extension to June 2025 has been declined and their advice that we will lose 
the funding if the projects are not completed within the year. 
A good example of the sort of project at risk is the $4 million East- West 
Cycleway in Nelson City.  This proposal will significantly add and improve the 
network of cycleways in Nelson by providing a dedicated cycleway from the 



eastern suburbs to major schools and the hospital as well as then linking to 
the main cycleways north and south. However, it is a complicated geography 
that will involve at least six roads, hundreds of homes and dozens of 
businesses. We would welcome showing the area to understand the 
complexity of the project. 
Our councils have both become involved in controversies in recent months 
over transport initiatives in places like Pōhara, Motueka, Stoke and in Nelson 
City over changes in the roading corridor required to deliver Government 
transport priorities for cycleways and buses. These issues can be managed 
with careful and thorough consultation but not without adequate time.  We 
are also concerned about the toll on our staff from the backlash when times 
are inadequate to do these processes well. 
We are sure that you will also be aware that our region is also having to 
manage tens of millions of dollars of infrastructure repair work arising from 
the August storms last year.  This work is putting our engineering teams 
under huge pressure. The Nelson Annual Plan has us doing more 
infrastructural work in 2023/24 than ever in NCC’s history and Tasman’s is 
similarly ambitious. Nelson’s new Chief Executive has advised that it is just 
not possible or reasonable to deliver these cycleway projects on this timetable 
as well as the flood repair work, and that the repair works need to take 
priority. 
We would welcome further engagement with your Transport or Waka Kotahi 
officials and any requests for further information.  We have copied this letter 
to our two affected electorate MPs Hon Damien O’Connor and Rachel Boyack 
to keep them informed.  We are keen to find a solution that works for the 
Government and our communities. 
Yours sincerely, 
 
 
Hon Dr Nick Smith 
Stuart Bryant 
Mayor of Nelson 
Acting Mayor of Tasman 
 
 
 
 
 


From:
Mayor Nadine Taylor
To:
0Councillors; 0ExecManagement; Mayor Nick Smith; Tim King
Cc:
Robyn Scherer; "Paula Dempsey"; Andi Houston; Kelsey McLean
Subject:
Overseas on leave - 1 July to 14 July 2023
Date:
Wednesday, 28 June 2023 9:19:12 am
Attachments:
image001.jpg
CAUTION: External email.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender
and know the content is safe.
Kia ora koutou,
I am overseas on leave from 1 July to 14 July 2023 inclusive.
Deputy Mayor David Croad will be Acting Mayor while I am away.
My Executive Assistant, Sarah Woodhouse will be supporting David during my absence. You can
contact Sarah via email at [email address] or cell phone 027 215 6683.
Nadine Taylor
Mayor
MDC logo
Te Kaunihera ā-Rohe o Wairau
Phone: 03 520 7400
15 Seymour Street, PO Box 443
Blenheim 7240, New Zealand
[email address]
www.marlborough.govt.nz
This email, including any attachments, is confidential and may contain legally privileged material and is only
for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient then any use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
notify us immediately and delete the original message. This email does not necessarily represent the views of
the Marlborough District Council. Thank you.

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
 Tim King; s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons
s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons
Cc:
s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA 
 
- prote Rachel Boyack
 
   
 
; s.7(2)(a) LGOIMA - protect privacy of natural persons
Subject:
Re: Thomas Cawthron Amendment Bill
Date:
Wednesday, 28 June 2023 1:24:13 pm
Attachments:
image001.png
PR looks good and lets hope path through Parliament is smooth. Well done to all on
getting this through.
Get Outlook for iOS

From:
Mayor Nick Smith
To:
Daryl Wehner; Tim King; Mayor Nick Smith; [email address]
Cc:
Kelsey McLean; Robyn Scherer
Subject:
Re: Email on behalf of Sue Sheldon, IHL Chair
Date:
Monday, 10 July 2023 1:50:58 pm
Attachments:
image001.jpg
image002.png
image007.png
image008.jpg
image004.png
image006.png
Sue and Daryl,
This looks robust, sensible and just as we ask. Tx for effort put into finding a workable
solution. 
Nick
Get Outlook for iOS



ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
1
ÿ
2ÿ
345ÿ
6768ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
3459
ÿ
4
ÿ
45
9
ÿ
3459
ÿ

ÿ


ÿ
ÿ
34

9
9ÿ





ÿ
9

ÿ

9ÿ


5ÿ
9

ÿ
ÿ
 9!ÿ
""8ÿ
ÿ
 9!ÿ
#"$ÿ
 

ÿ
%6"7ÿ

9ÿ
%7"7ÿ
ÿ
4
&

45
9
'4

9
9&
9(
&
)ÿ
3459

'&
9(
&
)ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
*+,-ÿ
/01ÿ
4
ÿ
4 ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
234
5678
9:ÿ
<677=98
>
8
3?ÿ
@ÿ
A>
B>
3739>
ÿ
6C
ÿ
<6778
>
739>
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
Dÿ
59ÿ
4
ÿ
4E4
F
ÿ
4ÿ


ÿ
9

ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
4
ÿ
4(ÿ
G
9
 ÿ
H
9
ÿ
9


ÿ
Iÿ
4ÿ
J
9
4ÿ

4
ÿ
4ÿ
ÿ

 ÿ

9ÿ

Jÿ
!


ÿ
9


ÿ

4ÿ
9
ÿ

9ÿ
E9
ÿ
K
9
ÿ



ÿ
99
ÿ
9
9ÿ
4 ÿ


4 ÿ
9
4
ÿ
9
9&
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ


ÿ
H
9
ÿ
9


ÿ
99

4
9
ÿ
E4
ÿ

ÿ

4
ÿ
4 ÿ
949
4
ÿ
4ÿ
ÿ
4ÿ
J9

ÿ

9ÿ
ÿ
K
K



ÿ
4 ÿ

9(4

(&
ÿ


ÿ
E9
ÿ

ÿ
4 ÿ
9ÿ
4
 ÿ
(4
F
ÿ
4ÿ
99ÿ
9
9ÿ
K

4E9
ÿ
4 ÿ

ÿ
(

9ÿ
9K
ÿ


9F
ÿ

4
4
F
ÿ
Eÿ
9
 F
ÿ





F
ÿ
4 ÿ



(
ÿ
9


&
ÿ
ÿ
9
ÿ
(4
ÿ
9K
ÿ

ÿ
J
9
4ÿ
3444

44ÿ
4 ÿ
H444
44ÿ
4
9ÿ
4

ÿ
Eÿ
E

ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
4
ÿ
L



4

94
ÿ


4
5&
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
Dÿ

J9

4
ÿ

Jÿ

ÿ

ÿ

J

4

9ÿ
J
9ÿ

ÿ

ÿ


ÿ
9K
ÿ
4ÿ

4

ÿ
9K
ÿ
9


ÿ

9ÿ
J


5ÿ
9Eÿ

4
ÿ
Eÿ
4
ÿ
4ÿ

4
 ÿ

9ÿ
4
(
ÿ

ÿ
J
9J9 ÿ
9
9&
ÿ
L
ÿ

ÿ


ÿ
E9
ÿ
ÿ
E9

ÿ
J

ÿ
4ÿ
949
4

(ÿ

4

ÿ
9K
ÿ
9


ÿ

Eÿ
9
ÿ


ÿ
9

&
ÿ
L
45F
ÿ


ÿ
E9
ÿ


 ÿ
4ÿ

95ÿ

9ÿ

ÿ
4ÿ

4

ÿ
9K
ÿ
9


ÿ
5ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
4
ÿ
3459
ÿ
4 ÿ

K
ÿ
M!

(N
Oÿ
POÿ
Q1Rÿ
POÿ
SPT
U
,1T
V
,Wÿ
V
QV
ÿ
4 ÿ


(4
ÿ

49

&
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
L

ÿ
E9
ÿ
ÿ
4ÿ
K



ÿ

ÿ
Eÿ
X4
4 ÿ
4 ÿ
E9
ÿ
9
4
ÿ
4ÿ


9ÿ
4ÿ

4
ÿ
Eÿ
4
ÿ
9

(
5ÿ
9


 ÿ

9ÿ
ÿ
99 ÿ
4
9
&
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
L
ÿ

99ÿ
K
9
E4
ÿ

9ÿ
59
ÿ
J9


(ÿ
K
 4&
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
-ÿ
YV
ZV
ÿ
,[V
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
\
ÿ
3459
F
ÿ
44ÿ





ÿ
]^ÿ
`abacdefdÿ
aÿ
e^ÿ
edg
ÿ
aÿ
hab^b^ÿ
ÿ
ÿ



ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
1ÿ
2345ÿ
6768ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
9
ÿ

ÿ


ÿ
5
 4ÿ


ÿ
 34

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
5 

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
 !ÿ
"#
$ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
%&'
()*
'
(+,(ÿ
./ÿ
1
2ÿ
345
46ÿ
78
8
5
49:2ÿ
;<9=5
9>ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
 4ÿ
3ÿ
?

ÿ
3
ÿ

5

5
ÿ
?
ÿ
81ÿ
9 ÿ
6768ÿ

5@
A
4@ÿ
?
34A
4@ÿ


45ÿ
?

ÿ

5ÿ
B C
DE#
C
DFDÿ
GHÿ

5ÿ
 
ÿ
I
45J
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
K
ÿ
 4ÿ
 4?


ÿ

 
ÿ

ÿ


ÿ
I443 
ÿ
L
4ÿ
A5

M5


4ÿ
55

4@ÿ
5
5
A N
ÿ
  4ÿ
O




ÿ
 34

ÿ

5 
P5Aÿ

Q
ÿ
ÿ
RS
<9=ÿ
TUVW
VVVÿ
X2Yÿ
499<Zÿ
S
6Yÿ
1
[6ÿ
\24Y]ÿ
S
6Yÿ
1
^2ÿ
X8
4995
9>W
ÿ
:66Y=5
941
5
69ÿ
49=ÿ
_&..`+*
_('
*
&+ÿ
'
&ÿ
abc
*
dbeÿ
&+ÿ
'
)bÿ
%&'
()*
'
(+,(ÿ
./ÿ
'
bÿ
f(*
(&ÿ
gc
c
*
(+_bÿ
'
)e&`,)ÿ
'
)bÿ
g++`(c
ÿ
h8
49ÿ
UVUij
UVUkW
ÿ
]<lm
2:1
ÿ
1
6ÿ
n28
]69ÿ
o5
1
\ÿ
49=ÿ
p4Y8
l6Y6<>^ÿ
q5
]1
Y5
:1
ÿ
o6<9:5
8
]ÿ
XY6r5
=5
9>ÿ
S
<9=5
9>ÿ
41
ÿ
4ÿ
]5
Z5
8
4Yÿ
8
2r28
sÿ
ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

4ÿ
AA


4ÿ

ÿ

5ÿ
3

54
ÿ
t67N
777ÿ
?
34A
4@ÿ
u5
ÿ
443ÿ
?

ÿ
  4ÿ
O




ÿ
 34

ÿ
 
4@ÿ
ÿ



ÿ
?
ÿ
tv7N
777J
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
@ÿ
G#
E#
ÿ
w#
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
x
4@ÿ
9
N
ÿ
  4ÿ
O




ÿ
ÿ
32ÿ
y6Y6Z41
<4ÿ
6ÿ
1
2ÿ
1
45
ÿ
6ÿ
76Y2Y2ÿ
ÿ
ÿ