Correspondence with Sir Thomas Eichelbaum
Ross Francis made this Official Information request to Ministry of Justice
The request was refused by Ministry of Justice.
From: Ross Francis
Dear Ministry of Justice,
Please send me all records, including but not limited to emails and deleted emails, of correspondence between the Justice Ministry and Sir Thomas Eichelbaum between 1 January 2000 and 3 March 2000 (inclusive).
In regards to the ministerial inquiry into the Peter Ellis case, please send me the first and last 10 pages of Sir Thomas Eichelbaum’s draft report including his conclusion. Please send me his conclusion if it does not appear in his final 10 pages. Please note I am not requesting any advice that officials may have provided Sir Thomas.
Sir Thomas Eichelbaum had nothing but praise for Justice Neil Williamson – the Ellis trial judge – when, in 1997, he delivered the Inaugural Neil Williamson Memorial Lecture. He referred to his late friend and colleague as a “model judge”.
"I had the greatest admiration for Neil…[he had] exceptional gifts of judgment, integrity and humanity. He conducted many of the most difficult trials of his time, and he did so impeccably. Neil was much more than an outstanding Judge…[he was] an exceptional human being."
Was Sir Thomas chosen to head the ministerial inquiry into the Peter Ellis case because of or depite his friendship with Williamson? Did anyone at the ministry suggest that it might be more appropriate to appoint a jurist who didn't have a vested interest in the outcome of the ministerial inquiry?
Yours faithfully,
Ross Francis
From: correspondence, official
Ministry of Justice
Good morning,
thank you for your request. This is an email to confirm it has been received by the Ministry.
Kind regards,
Sophie Warren
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Francis [mailto:[FOI #5371 email]]
Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2017 3:37 p.m.
To: correspondence, official
Subject: Official Information request - Correspondence with Sir Thomas Eichelbaum
Dear Ministry of Justice,
Please send me all records, including but not limited to emails and deleted emails, of correspondence between the Justice Ministry and Sir Thomas Eichelbaum between 1 January 2000 and 3 March 2000 (inclusive).
In regards to the ministerial inquiry into the Peter Ellis case, please send me the first and last 10 pages of Sir Thomas Eichelbaum’s draft report including his conclusion. Please send me his conclusion if it does not appear in his final 10 pages. Please note I am not requesting any advice that officials may have provided Sir Thomas.
Sir Thomas Eichelbaum had nothing but praise for Justice Neil Williamson – the Ellis trial judge – when, in 1997, he delivered the Inaugural Neil Williamson Memorial Lecture. He referred to his late friend and colleague as a “model judge”.
"I had the greatest admiration for Neil…[he had] exceptional gifts of judgment, integrity and humanity. He conducted many of the most difficult trials of his time, and he did so impeccably. Neil was much more than an outstanding Judge…[he was] an exceptional human being."
Was Sir Thomas chosen to head the ministerial inquiry into the Peter Ellis case because of or depite his friendship with Williamson? Did anyone at the ministry suggest that it might be more appropriate to appoint a jurist who didn't have a vested interest in the outcome of the ministerial inquiry?
Yours faithfully,
Ross Francis
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #5371 email]
Is [Ministry of Justice request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Ministry of Justice? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality notice:
This email may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by mistake, please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply from your system;
(2) do not act on this email in any other way.
Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Ross Francis left an annotation ()
Thanks for you reply Sophie.
I'm not sure why you have refused my request. You will be aware that the principle of the Official Information Act is that information should be released unless a good reason exists under the Act for withholding it. You have not provided me with a good reason. I suggest you consider my request in good faith and release the information I have requested.
Regards
Ross Francis
Link to this