Calculation Methods for Experience Rating
Rory Cobb made this Official Information request to Accident Compensation Corporation
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Rory Cobb to read a recent response and update the status.
From: Rory Cobb
Dear Accident Compensation Corporation,
Please can you provide details of the formulas used, and how the number of days Weekly Compensation Cover logged against an employer is used to calculate the Levy Year Experience Rating Modification in subsequent years.
Under s16(2) of the Official Information Act, my preferred way of receiving a response is by email to the address from which ACC received the original request, not by post.
Yours faithfully,
Rory Cobb
18 Higgs Road,
Mapua
From: Government Services
Accident Compensation Corporation
Dear Rory Cobb,
Please find enclosed a response to your request concerning levy experience
rating modifiers and formulas.
Yours sincerely
Government Services ACC
ACC cares about the environment – please don’t print this email
unless it is really necessary. Thank you.
Disclaimer:
"This message and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you believe you have received this email in error, please
advise us immediately by return email or telephone and then delete this
email together with all attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorised to use or copy this message or any
attachments or disclose the contents to any other person."
From: Rory Cobb
Dear Government Services,
While you have provided me with links to publicly available documents, these do not really answer the question. My request for this information remains unanswered.
I would like to know how the differing levels of weekly compensation and claim costs result in differing levels of discount or loading on an ACC bill. The information provided tells me that ACC must do this, and that in very broad terms a zero claims cost and low number of Weekly compensation days result in a discount and that high claim costs and weekly compensation days result in an increased loading on the ACC bill.
What is still not clear is how these numbers are derived. Are they calculated using a formula, or plucked arbitrarily from thin air?
I am attempting to assess the financial return on investing in improving Health and Safety and would like to be able to use these figures to justify a higher level of investment to the CEO.
I look forward to your response,
Yours sincerely,
Rory Cobb
From: Government Services
Accident Compensation Corporation
Good afternoon Mr Cobb
Thank you for your further correspondence of 14 April 2017 in relation to
our response of 21 March 2017 to your Official Information Act request of
22 February 2017.
Your request of 22 February refers to the calculation of levy year
experience rating modification. This is one component of assessing levies
under the experience rating programme for employers whose ACC levy is
$10,000 or more per year over three consecutive years (qualifying class 2
levy payers).
The formulas used for calculating levies for qualifying class 2 levy
payers are provided in sections 12 to 17 of the Accident Compensation
(Experience Rating) Regulations 2016 (regulations). The link to the
regulations is provided in our letter of 22 March 2017.
We acknowledge that the calculations set out in those sections are not
straightforward. However, I can note the following about the experience
rating modification (ERM):
· The ERM can affect an employer’s levy by up to +60%/-35%
· It is worked out by comparing an individual employer’s claims
experience (i.e. weekly compensation days and claim numbers) to that of
all other employers in their industry peer group
· The calculations that are used to make those comparisons are
provided by section 15 of the regulations.
To assist you, I have attached some explanatory notes on the ERM
calculations, which have come from an internal ACC document.
Calculations compare individual employers to those in their industry peer
group
As indicated above, the level of discount/loading calculated for the ERM
is determined by comparing the claims experience of an individual employer
to others in their industry peer group. Generally speaking, if an employer
has a low number of claims and weekly compensation days compared to their
industry peers, then that employer will get a discount on their levy.
Conversely, an employer with comparatively high numbers will receive a
loading.
Therefore, an employer’s ERM is not determined on their company’s weekly
compensation days and claim numbers alone. It requires comparing that
employer’s results to all other employers in its industry peer group.
You will appreciate that injury rates for individual employers can
improve, remain stable or worsen over time. The same can be true for
industry peer groups. The relative performance of individual employers and
industry peer groups can result in numerous scenarios. For example:
· if an employer’s claims experience remains stable while the
industry as a whole improves, then the individual employer’s ERM will tend
to increase (resulting in a higher levy); or
· if an employer’s claims experience continually improves, while
their industry peer group’s results remain stable, then that employer’s
ERM will tend to decrease (resulting in lower levies).
The degree of increase or reduction will depend on the relative difference
in the claims experience results.
Please contact us if you have further queries
We appreciate that this is a complex subject. If you have further
questions on this matter, we can arrange for you to have a conversation
with a technical expert on ACC levy calculations. If this is something you
would find helpful, please email your contact details to us at
[1][email address].
Regards
Government Services
ACC
Disclaimer:
"This message and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you believe you have received this email in error, please
advise us immediately by return email or telephone and then delete this
email together with all attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorised to use or copy this message or any
attachments or disclose the contents to any other person."
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence