Dear Kathy,

Thank you very much for your request. We will respond in the legislated timeframe.

Kind regards,

Saioa Polin
Official Correspondence Advisor

+64 4 474 5504   |   [email address]   |   www.epa.govt.nz

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.

This email message and any attachment(s) are intended for the addressee(s) only.
The contents may be confidential and are not necessarily the opinions of EPA New Zealand.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the message and any attachment(s).

-----Original Message-----
From: Information Mailbox
Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2019 1:52 PM
To: Ministerials <[email address]>
Subject: FW: Official Information request - Reporting of aerial 1080 operations and incidents

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy White [mailto:[FOI #9478 email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2019 12:59 PM
To: Information Mailbox <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Reporting of aerial 1080 operations and incidents

Dear Environmental Protection Authority,

Are pest contractors working on contract for regional councils, and/or regional councils themselves, required by law to report all aerial 1080 operations conducted by or for them, and accidents/incidents within those operations, to the EPA?

Is there a time restriction for this to be done in order to be included in your annual reports? Whose responsibility is it - the pest contractor or the council?

Is failure to do this a breach, and if so, what action is taken?

I'm conscious that your 2017 annual report states that there were no aerial 1080 operations done by regional councils.
I know this is incorrect and as the Chair of the Environmental and Services Performance Committee for Waikato Regional Council, it concerns me that data is missing from your reports. Do you have anyone checking regional councils' PPCA plans for instance or prompting them for information before you produce your annual reports? Do you amend your annual reports in any way if you are given data about livestock deaths in council operations after reports have been produced? Is the government given updated information about operations and incidents that have been omitted?

I see that there have been a number of years that the EPA has reported as many as a third of 1080 aerial operations having incidents or misapplications of bait. For example 2016 and 2011. This seems like a large proportion of incidents and errors with bait application. Is this of concern to you? Please advise what action has been taken or is about to be taken regarding this concerning level of errors within operations.

I have had direct contact with farmers who have told me stories that are different to what has been reported by pest contractors especially in terms of pilots flying through no-fly zones and dropping bait on livestock. This should be of concern to MPI not only in terms of animal welfare legislation but also in terms of our meat export reputation. How do you check that pest contractors are giving you accurate information? Do you randomly contact farmers for instance? Is action taken against pest contractors who misrepresent a poisoning operation?

I commented recently to the media about a third of 1080 aerial operations having incidents and accidents with bait ending up in places it shouldn't. Up until then, you had always included a summary of incident details in your annual report. Since then, your latest annual report on 1080 drops has left out these details. Why did you decide to omit the summary? I feel it was a helpful section that enabled people to quickly see if information had been accurately reported to you. Failure to include this will lead to more lack of transparency in aerial 1080 operations and inability for councillors and other decision-makers to appropriately assess the risk of 1080 poison within our communities.

Many thanks in advance for answers to these questions.

Yours faithfully

Kathy White

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #9478 email]

Is [EPA request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Environmental Protection Authority? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Dear Kathy,

 

Please find attached a response to your enquiry.

 

Kind regards,

 

Saioa Polin

Official Correspondence Advisor

+64 4 474 5504   |   [1][email address]   |   [2]www.epa.govt.nz

 

[3]cid:image003.jpg@01D38A30.E1094220

 

Follow us on [4]Facebook, [5]Twitter and [6]LinkedIn.

 

This email message and any attachment(s) are intended for the addressee(s)
only.

The contents may be confidential and are not necessarily the opinions of
EPA New Zealand.

If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
the message and any attachment(s).

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Kathy White
[[7]mailto:[FOI #9478 email]]

Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2019 12:59 PM

To: Information Mailbox <[8][email address]>

Subject: Official Information request - Reporting of aerial 1080
operations and incidents

 

Dear Environmental Protection Authority,

 

Are pest contractors working on contract for regional councils, and/or
regional councils themselves, required by law to report all aerial 1080
operations conducted by or for them, and accidents/incidents within those
operations, to the EPA?

 

Is there a time restriction for this to be done in order to be included in
your annual reports? Whose responsibility is it - the pest contractor or
the council?

 

Is failure to do this a breach, and if so, what action is taken?

 

I'm conscious that your 2017 annual report states that there were no
aerial 1080 operations done by regional councils.

I know this is incorrect and as the Chair of the Environmental and
Services Performance Committee for Waikato Regional Council, it concerns
me that data is missing from your reports. Do you have anyone checking
regional councils' PPCA plans for instance or prompting them for
information before you produce your annual reports? Do you amend your
annual reports in any way if you are given data about livestock deaths in
council operations after reports have been produced? Is the government
given updated information about operations and incidents that have been
omitted?

 

I see that there have been a number of years that the EPA has reported as
many as a third of 1080 aerial operations having incidents or
misapplications of bait. For example 2016 and 2011. This seems like a
large proportion of incidents and errors with bait application. Is this of
concern to you? Please advise what action has been taken or is about to be
taken regarding this concerning level of errors within operations.

 

I have had direct contact with farmers who have told me stories that are
different to what has been reported by pest contractors especially in
terms of pilots flying through no-fly zones and dropping bait on
livestock. This should be of concern to MPI not only in terms of animal
welfare legislation but also in terms of our meat export reputation. How
do you check that pest contractors are giving you accurate information? Do
you randomly contact farmers for instance? Is action taken against pest
contractors who misrepresent a poisoning operation?

 

I commented recently to the media about a third of 1080 aerial operations
having incidents and accidents with bait ending up in places it shouldn't.
Up until then, you had always included a summary of incident details in
your annual report. Since then, your latest annual report on 1080 drops
has left out these details. Why did you decide to omit the summary? I feel
it was a helpful section that enabled people to quickly see if information
had been accurately reported to you. Failure to include this will lead to
more lack of transparency in aerial 1080 operations and inability for
councillors and other decision-makers to appropriately assess the risk of
1080 poison within our communities.

 

Many thanks in advance for answers to these questions.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Kathy White

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[9][FOI #9478 email]

 

Is [10][EPA request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Environmental Protection Authority? If so, please contact us
using this form:

[11]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[12]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.epa.govt.nz/
3. http://www.epa.govt.nz/
4. https://www.facebook.com/EPAgovtNZ/
5. https://twitter.com/EPAgovtnz
6. https://www.linkedin.com/company/epagovt...
7. mailto:[FOI #9478 email]
8. mailto:[email address]
9. mailto:[FOI #9478 email]
10. mailto:[EPA request email]
11. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
12. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections