Peter Ellis case II

Ross Francis made this Official Information request to Ministry of Justice

The request was refused by Ministry of Justice.

From: Ross Francis

Dear Ministry of Justice,

I have the following request in regards to my research into the Peter Ellis case.

The ministerial inquiry’s terms of reference did not require Sir Thomas Eichelbaum “to attribute or apportion blame to particular individuals who undertook the interviews”. Nonetheless, Val Sim - the Ministry's then chief legal counsel - warned him that the “personal reputations” of the children’s interviewers, the complainants and their families were at stake.

What expertise or prior experience of administering inquiries did Val Sim possess at the time of the ministerial inquiry? What concerns, if any, has the Ministry expressed for the personal reputations of the eleven crèche workers, who were judged to have been unfairly dismissed when the Christchurch Civic Crèche closed down (as a result of the police investigation)? What concerns, if any, has Ministry expressed for Ellis’ mother, whose flat was raided by police on the suspicion that she, too, had molested children? Please provide me with all records held by the Ministry about these matters.

Prior to the publication and presentation of his final report, what criticisms, if any, did Sir Thomas make of the conviction children's evidential interviews? Prior to the publication and presentation of his final report, did Sir Thomas express general satisfaction with the quality of the conviction children's evidential interviews?

Yours faithfully,

Ross Francis

Link to this

From: correspondence, official
Ministry of Justice

Good morning Mr Francis,

Acknowledging receipt of your OIA request of 06 March 2019, as below.

We have passed this to the relevant business unit and you can expect a response on or before 03 April 2019.

Kind regards,

Alex Pickard
Advisor | Official Correspondence
Communications
Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Francis <[FOI #9781 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2019 8:28 p.m.
To: correspondence, official <[Ministry of Justice request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Peter Ellis case II

Dear Ministry of Justice,

I have the following request in regards to my research into the Peter Ellis case.

The ministerial inquiry’s terms of reference did not require Sir Thomas Eichelbaum “to attribute or apportion blame to particular individuals who undertook the interviews”. Nonetheless, Val Sim - the Ministry's then chief legal counsel - warned him that the “personal reputations” of the children’s interviewers, the complainants and their families were at stake.

What expertise or prior experience of administering inquiries did Val Sim possess at the time of the ministerial inquiry? What concerns, if any, has the Ministry expressed for the personal reputations of the eleven crèche workers, who were judged to have been unfairly dismissed when the Christchurch Civic Crèche closed down (as a result of the police investigation)? What concerns, if any, has Ministry expressed for Ellis’ mother, whose flat was raided by police on the suspicion that she, too, had molested children? Please provide me with all records held by the Ministry about these matters.

Prior to the publication and presentation of his final report, what criticisms, if any, did Sir Thomas make of the conviction children's evidential interviews? Prior to the publication and presentation of his final report, did Sir Thomas express general satisfaction with the quality of the conviction children's evidential interviews?

Yours faithfully,

Ross Francis

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #9781 email]

Is [Ministry of Justice request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Ministry of Justice? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Confidentiality notice:
This email may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by mistake, please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply from your system;
(2) do not act on this email in any other way.
Thank you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: Jackson, Lydia
Ministry of Justice


Attachment image001.jpg
15K Download

Attachment OIA Response R Francis 03.04.19.pdf
365K Download View as HTML


Kia ora Ross,

 

Please find attached your OIA response.

 

Many thanks,

Lydia.

 

   

[1]Description: Description: Description: Lydia Jackson
Description: Communications Advisor - Media |
http://justice.govt.nz/courts/shared/jus... Communications Services
Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te
Ture
 P DDI 04 4394065 | Ext 44065| M
0272902119
[2][email address]
| [3]justice.govt.nz

 

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Confidentiality notice:
This email may contain information that is confidential or legally
privileged. If you have received it by mistake, please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply
from your system;
(2) do not act on this email in any other way.
Thank you.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
2. mailto:[email address]
3. http://www.justice.govt.nz/

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Ministry of Justice only: