Dear Tony

 

This email acknowledges your below request for information made under the
Official Information Act 1982.

 

Your request has been forwarded to the appropriate section of Waka Kotahi
NZ Transport Agency for response. They will contact you if they require
clarification of your request, more time to respond, or if your request
has been transferred to another organisation to respond to. Unless more
time is required, Waka Kotahi will send a response to you within 20
working days of receiving your request – in this instance on or before 29
July 2020.

 

The information you have requested may contain the names and contact
details of our staff. Please let us know whether you require these names
and contact details. We may need to consult our staff before deciding
whether we can release this information, and this may take a bit more
time. If we do not hear from you we will assume that you do not require
staff names and contact details.

 

If you would like to discuss your request with Waka Kotahi, please contact
us by email at [1][email address].

 

Regards  

_________  __________________________________________

Ministerial Services

Government | Engagement & Partnerships

Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
National Office / 50 Victoria Street
Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand 
_________  _____________________________________

          
     [2]cid:image002.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [3]cid:image003.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [4]cid:image004.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0  

From: Tony Randle <[FYI request #13210 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2020 11:20 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Request for Supporting Analysis
used to identify the Golden Mile Options

 

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

 

The Lets Get Wellington Moving (LGWM) Project is currently consulting the
public on three options for improving the Golden Mile ().  I would like to
understand the analysis that led LGWM to propose these three options.

 

1) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the 'intervention “toolbox” that
identified over 150 different types of interventions that could address
the problems and help to achieve the investment objectives' as outlined in
Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

2) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the ' “root cause” analysis of the
problems, which resulted in identification of four key issues relating to
dwell times, congestion, intersection delay / variability, congestion
delay / variability and pedestrian / urban amenity' as outlined in Section
4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

3) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the tool that documented 'over 250
scenarios were identified for the sub-sections of the Golden Mile' and the
assessments by which LGWM decided which scenarios 'it didn’t consider
feasible or effective from further consideration' resulting in 21
scenarios as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report
(June 2020) ?

4) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the assessment tool in which LGWM did
'further apply the mitigation / intervention strategies to each of the 21
sub-sections' which 'led to the identification of each scenario’s key
features / attributes and enabled before and after cross sections to be
developed' as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report
(June 2020) ?

5) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the MCA scoring tool in which 'Each
scenario sub-section was then subjected to an MCA process' and 'As a
consequence of the MCA evaluation, nine further scenarios were removed,
which left 12 sub-section scenarios remaining for short list assessment'
as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020)
?

6) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the scoring in the '“decision making
tree” as set out in Figure 12.' where 'a number of sub-section scenarios
from the Long List Report were able to be ruled out' as outlined in
Section 6 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

7) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the detailed benefit calculations
used to create 'Table 5 Net present value of short-listed corridor option
benefits / disbenefits, 40-year evaluation, 6% discount rate' on page 49
of the Golden Mile Short List Options Report ?

8) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the detailed benefit calculations
used to create 'Table 6: Pedestrian realm benefits with alternative input
assumptions ' on page 50 of the Golden Mile Short List Options Report ?

 

If this information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it is
provided in its complete and original electronic format.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Tony Randle

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[5][FYI request #13210 email]

 

Is [6][NZTA request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Transport Agency? If so, please
contact us using this form:

[7]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[8]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://www.facebook.com/TransportAgency
3. https://twitter.com/nzta_news
4. http://www.youtube.com/user/NZTransportA...
5. mailto:[FYI request #13210 email]
6. mailto:[NZTA request email]
7. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
8. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Dear Tony

 

Please find attached a letter advising of an extension to your request for
information under the Official Information Act 1982 of 1 July 2020.

 

A response will now be sent to you on or before 5 August 2020.

 

Regards

_________  ____________________________________________   

Ministerial Services

Te Waka Kôtuia - Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
National Office / 50 Victoria Street
Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand 
_________ _____________________________________________

[1]Waka Kotahi
logo[2]cid:image002.jpg@01CF322A.4C836B10[3]cid:image003.jpg@01CF322A.4C836B10[4]cid:image004.jpg@01CF322A.4C836B10

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Tony Randle <[5][FOI #13210 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2020 11:20 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[6][NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Request for Supporting Analysis
used to identify the Golden Mile Options

 

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

 

The Lets Get Wellington Moving (LGWM) Project is currently consulting the
public on three options for improving the Golden Mile ().  I would like to
understand the analysis that led LGWM to propose these three options.

 

1) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the 'intervention “toolbox” that
identified over 150 different types of interventions that could address
the problems and help to achieve the investment objectives' as outlined in
Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

2) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the ' “root cause” analysis of the
problems, which resulted in identification of four key issues relating to
dwell times, congestion, intersection delay / variability, congestion
delay / variability and pedestrian / urban amenity' as outlined in Section
4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

3) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the tool that documented 'over 250
scenarios were identified for the sub-sections of the Golden Mile' and the
assessments by which LGWM decided which scenarios 'it didn’t consider
feasible or effective from further consideration' resulting in 21
scenarios as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report
(June 2020) ?

4) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the assessment tool in which LGWM did
'further apply the mitigation / intervention strategies to each of the 21
sub-sections' which 'led to the identification of each scenario’s key
features / attributes and enabled before and after cross sections to be
developed' as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report
(June 2020) ?

5) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the MCA scoring tool in which 'Each
scenario sub-section was then subjected to an MCA process' and 'As a
consequence of the MCA evaluation, nine further scenarios were removed,
which left 12 sub-section scenarios remaining for short list assessment'
as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020)
?

6) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the scoring in the '“decision making
tree” as set out in Figure 12.' where 'a number of sub-section scenarios
from the Long List Report were able to be ruled out' as outlined in
Section 6 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

7) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the detailed benefit calculations
used to create 'Table 5 Net present value of short-listed corridor option
benefits / disbenefits, 40-year evaluation, 6% discount rate' on page 49
of the Golden Mile Short List Options Report ?

8) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the detailed benefit calculations
used to create 'Table 6: Pedestrian realm benefits with alternative input
assumptions ' on page 50 of the Golden Mile Short List Options Report ?

 

If this information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it is
provided in its complete and original electronic format.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Tony Randle

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[7][FOI #13210 email]

 

Is [8][NZTA request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Transport Agency? If so, please
contact us using this form:

[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[10]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

References

Visible links
2. https://www.facebook.com/TransportAgency
3. https://twitter.com/nzta_news
4. http://www.youtube.com/user/NZTransportA...
5. mailto:[FOI #13210 email]
6. mailto:[NZTA request email]
7. mailto:[FOI #13210 email]
8. mailto:[NZTA request email]
9. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
10. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Dear Tony

 

Please find attached the response to your request of 1 July 2020 for
information under the Official Information Act 1982.

 

Regards

_________  __________________________________________

Ministerial Services

Government | Engagement & Partnerships

Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
National Office / 50 Victoria Street
Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand 
_________  _____________________________________

          
     [1]cid:image002.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [2]cid:image003.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [3]cid:image004.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0  

  

From: Tony Randle <[4][FOI #13210 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2020 11:20 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[5][NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Request for Supporting Analysis
used to identify the Golden Mile Options

 

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

 

The Lets Get Wellington Moving (LGWM) Project is currently consulting the
public on three options for improving the Golden Mile ().  I would like to
understand the analysis that led LGWM to propose these three options.

 

1) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the 'intervention “toolbox” that
identified over 150 different types of interventions that could address
the problems and help to achieve the investment objectives' as outlined in
Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

2) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the ' “root cause” analysis of the
problems, which resulted in identification of four key issues relating to
dwell times, congestion, intersection delay / variability, congestion
delay / variability and pedestrian / urban amenity' as outlined in Section
4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

3) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the tool that documented 'over 250
scenarios were identified for the sub-sections of the Golden Mile' and the
assessments by which LGWM decided which scenarios 'it didn’t consider
feasible or effective from further consideration' resulting in 21
scenarios as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report
(June 2020) ?

4) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the assessment tool in which LGWM did
'further apply the mitigation / intervention strategies to each of the 21
sub-sections' which 'led to the identification of each scenario’s key
features / attributes and enabled before and after cross sections to be
developed' as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report
(June 2020) ?

5) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the MCA scoring tool in which 'Each
scenario sub-section was then subjected to an MCA process' and 'As a
consequence of the MCA evaluation, nine further scenarios were removed,
which left 12 sub-section scenarios remaining for short list assessment'
as outlined in Section 4 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020)
?

6) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the scoring in the '“decision making
tree” as set out in Figure 12.' where 'a number of sub-section scenarios
from the Long List Report were able to be ruled out' as outlined in
Section 6 of the Golden Mile Short List Report (June 2020) ?

7) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the detailed benefit calculations
used to create 'Table 5 Net present value of short-listed corridor option
benefits / disbenefits, 40-year evaluation, 6% discount rate' on page 49
of the Golden Mile Short List Options Report ?

8) Can LGWM please provide a copy of the detailed benefit calculations
used to create 'Table 6: Pedestrian realm benefits with alternative input
assumptions ' on page 50 of the Golden Mile Short List Options Report ?

 

If this information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it is
provided in its complete and original electronic format.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Tony Randle

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[6][FOI #13210 email]

 

Is [7][NZTA request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Transport Agency? If so, please
contact us using this form:

[8]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

References

Visible links
1. https://www.facebook.com/TransportAgency
2. https://twitter.com/nzta_news
3. http://www.youtube.com/user/NZTransportA...
4. mailto:[FOI #13210 email]
5. mailto:[NZTA request email]
6. mailto:[FOI #13210 email]
7. mailto:[NZTA request email]
8. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
9. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...