They failed to answer properly the same questions here. https://fyi.org.nz/request/19080-risk-be...

Whoever signed off the vaccine must be now starting to worry given healthy children are dropping dead which was entirely predictable given what was going on overseas before this poison was signed off in NZ

Okay given this is the most recent response to Benefit / Risk analysis this confirms that there has only been one benefit / risk analysis done which states the Benefit / Risk "is not clear". Per Ministry of Health documentation under other Official Information Act Requests and I quote "The process for removal of an approved medicine from the market is different. It involves a review of the risk-benefit of the product following reported adverse events where a signal is identified that the product has potential for harm". So I suspect that there have been no risk-benefit analysis because the CV-ISMB despite death and injury continue to say that there aren't any identified signals. That has to be the only way they are avoiding doing a risk benefit analysis. There was a weight loss product Reductil taken off the shelf as an increased risk of serious cardivascular events such as heart attacks and stroke. This therapy has increased illness ten-fold including the above conditions. The damn is about to burst on the MOH, Medsafe, Medical profession as to the massive cover up there is.

This is despite the CV-ISMB throughout all of their memos stating that the risk / benefit is still in favor of vaccine but can't provide one. https://fyi.org.nz/request/20204-cv-ismb...

The link supplied www.health.govt.nz/system/files/document.... comes up with this message "Sorry - you don’t have permission to access this page on our server"

I know the Risk / Benefit document they link too (though it’s not coming up here) is the one that concludes “the risk benefit profile is not clear”. It’s now time for some serious pressure to be applied to MOH, Medsafe, Politicians and we start getting to the bottom of things. How does an untested, emergency use “treatment” get mandated, can kill people, has thousands of injuries and stays in circulation. The new bivalent vaccine was tested on mice only and got approved!! The pharmaceutical industry is corrupt and the regulators and medical industries have been captured and / or threatened into silence and submission. Mr James has some serious questions to answer now that the new normal involves children dropping dead and having cardiac arrests

Hi

Did anyone save a copy of the documents in H202106950 which is the link that no longer works for public access? I am looking specifically for a copy of the MAAC minutes 2/2/21 which was included in that document set. but all of it would be great.

Alternatively if anyone has requested by OIA or otherwise that access be reinstated could I have a reference to follow or link.

MAAC minutes are where the risk benefit analysis reference sits and like most of you I would like a copy.

Thank you and regards

HI All

I have sourced a copy of MAAC Minutes but am still looking for Document 10 that has the Risk Benefit Summary. I have the wording but looking for a copy of the page (according to above pg 94). The entire document ideally but if not then the header page and the page with the Risk Benefit summary.

thanks again.

Regards

I have the document.

Saved to Google drive. 👇

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wuxQMUg...

In Australia, the following was released in foi-2389-06.pdf
Nonclinical Evaluation Report
BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine
(COMIRNATYTM)
Submission No: PM-2020-05461-1-2
Sponsor: Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd
January 2021

Summary (page 4)
BNT162b2 (V9) was found to be immunogenic in non-clinical studies in mice, rats and rhesus macaques. BNT162b2 (V9) induced humoral and cellular immune responses in mice and monkeys. However, antibodies and T cells in monkeys declined quickly after 5 weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 (V9) raising long term immunity concerns.