Items developed for Covid that are being re-purposed post-coved
Al made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health
The request was partially successful.
From: Al
Hi everyone,
I’m interested in what was developed for Covid that is being currently or planed to be reused in areas other than solely Covid.
This includes:
- the HIRA business case (released as part of an OIA on the Ministry's website) lists some items developed and learnings from Covid 19 that HIRA will make use of.
Question: Can I be supplied with what HRIA is using, learning from or repurposing items that was initially developed for Covid-19 use?
- items that are now expanding their existing scope or complete re-use or re-development in other areas (with the Covid systems as the starting point or inspiration) and how those decisions were made (the frameworks and business cases if applicable).
These are some examples I’ve seen listed - which I'd like documents or discussions on about their existing or planned usage post Covid:
- Covid Population Identification & Register
- Covid-19 Immunisation Register
- Covid 19 Vaccine Booking And Scheduling System,
- the Covid CARM
- the Covid Tracer App
- the National Contract Tracing Solution
- and what was used to deliver borders management (within the Ministry of Health) and Care in the Community.
This may not be the full list of assets in use for Covid that I am seeking information on repurposed or expanded useage (it's what I could find via the website) but I hope it helps give context to my request.
Thank you for your time,
Al Johnson
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora Al,
Please find attached a letter relating to your official information act
request.
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
Manatū Hauora | Ministry of Health
M[1]inistry of Health information releases
U[2]nite against COVID-19
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
2. https://covid19.govt.nz/
From: hnzOIA
Tēnā koe,
Thank you for contacting Te Whatu Ora, Health NZ. This is an automatic
reply to confirm that we have received your email. Depending on the
nature of your request you may not receive a response for up to 20 working
days. We will try to respond to your query as quickly as possible.
s information that is identified to be of general public interest, the
response may also be published on our website. If we e response to your
OIA request, all personal information, including your name and contact
details will be removed.
Ngā mihi
Te Whatu Ora, Health NZ.
show quoted sections
From: hnzOIA
Kia ora Al,
Thank you for your request for information regarding COVID Data on 9
March. Please find attached our response to your request.
If you have any questions, please get in touch at
[1][email address].
If you are not happy with this response, you have the right to make a
complaint to the Ombudsman. Information about how to do this is available
at [2]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phoning 0800 802 602.
Ngâ mihi,
Te Whatu Ora Ministerial Team
Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand
TeWhatuOra.govt.nz
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. file:///tmp/foiextract20230405-39-uh8hl0#
From: Al
Hi everyone,
As part of this request and response HNZ00012907 I've been provided a good summary of what was developed in Covid that both is and is not being reused - thank you.
But I also asked in my request for any relevant business cases or documentation that shows how the decisions were made to re-use them. This aspect of my request wasn't referred to in the response - it may mean they do not exist but the portion of my request that goes 'how were the decisions made' has gone unanswered so I still do not know.
I referred to business cases as this is often how decisions are made with pro/cons and cost benefit analysis. Do business cases exist for any or all of the listed products in my original request? If so I request them.
In the absence of a business case if they do not exist - could you please still provide me with any types of communications or documentation that shows how decisions were made in the re-use of these applications post Covid?
Thank you for your continued help,
Al Johnson
From: hnzOIA
Tēnā koe,
Thank you for contacting Te Whatu Ora, Health NZ. This is an automatic
reply to confirm that we have received your email. Depending on the
nature of your request you may not receive a response for up to 20 working
days. We will try to respond to your query as quickly as possible.
s information that is identified to be of general public interest, the
response may also be published on our website. If we e response to your
OIA request, all personal information, including your name and contact
details will be removed.
Ngā mihi
Te Whatu Ora, Health NZ.
show quoted sections
From: hnzOIA
Kia ora Al,
Thank you for your request for information on 18 April 2023. Please find
attached our response to your request.
If you have any questions, please get in touch at
[1][email address].
If you are not happy with this response, you have the right to make a
complaint to the Ombudsman. Information about how to do this is available
at [2]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phoning 0800 802 602.
Ngā mihi,
Te Whatu Ora Ministerial Team
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. file:///tmp/foiextract20230517-24703-1oryef8#
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
Al left an annotation ()
I asked this OIA as the NZCCL raised as an issue scope creep on their work to try and get docs and provide feedback in 2021 on domestic vaccine passes.
This answer shows scope creep in the response (although they refused any documents for me to understand how the decisions were made). The re-use of covid technologies is interesting as it was such a huge privacy impact - and they are maintaining items like a population register to reuse for other things (which has the entire populations details).
How did they make that decision that it was okay to do that?
Link to this