Questions arising from OIA response H2023031262

Catherine Jamieson made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health

Response to this request is long overdue. By law Ministry of Health should have responded by now (details and exceptions). The requester can complain to the Ombudsman.

From: Catherine Jamieson

Dear Mr James

This is a request for information pursuant to the Official Information Act.
Thank you for your recent replies. In order to understand some of the information, I have some further questions please. Recent OIA materials have informed
-reports associated with death of the consumer are never identified in SMARS and were not identified in the COVID-19 vaccine safety reports for privacy.
-reports where death is the only reported reaction are not included in the line listing;

OIA response H2023031262 refers to caveat text. Can you please confirm that this refers to the following text on the link below:-

‘any report where it is considered the patient may be identifiable (eg due to the rareness of the condition).’
https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Projects/B1/...

Can you please answer the question that remains unanswered in OIA response H2023032008 and confirm whether or not the aggregated material from the Covid 19 Medsafe Safety Reports includes AEFI-A numbers not included in the line listings because they are associated with a report of death or otherwise.

I understand reports cannot be removed from the system they can only be made invalid and that criteria for a valid report are:-
1. one patient identifier (eg, name, initials, gender, date of birth, age)
2. suspect medicine(s)
3. suspected reaction(s)
4. reporter details.

What mechanism is used to remove reports of where death is the only reported reaction and reported terms of death from line listings? Is it a manual or automated process? If automated please provide the date at which it became automated.

If an assessment number is missing from a line listing can there be other reasons for that other than the report being marked invalid or it being associated with a report where death is the only reported reaction?

What is the treatment for an update made to an existing report where death is the only reported reaction in the update? Is this report then removed from the line listing?

In H2023032008 it is stated that with regard to safety reports

‘counts may change due to receipt of additional information. This may mean some reports are determined to be invalid or incorrect when further information is made available..the information may change over time, due to quality control procedures and/or receipt of further information’.

There are AEFI-A numbers that were included in Safety Report 46 that are not included in the line listing posted 28/8/23. Can you please supply the suite of all reasons these AEFI-A numbers have not been included ie not satisfying the criteria for a valid report, duplicate reports etc.

As the vast majority are very early reports it is unlikely they have been omitted post December 2022 due to being invalid - this would be fairly belated wouldn't it? If a further report was made with updated symptoms and given another assessment number rather than an update to intial report, which report would be retained - the earlier with update information or the later including the prior information? Or are they both retained and linked somehow?

In addition to direct contact with the reporter or patient what are the different specific processes whereby updated information can be received and what systems or procedures are used?

Furthermore, allowing for the omitted reports there are 355 more AEFI-A numbers in the line listing posted 28/8/23 than in Safety Report 46 yet there are in the realm of 13,000 less lines in the line listing posted 28/8/23. In addition there are duplicate rows in the line listing posted 28/8/23 and there do not seem to be duplicate rows in report 46. Can you please provide explanation as to what has caused this unusual presentation? Please include any communications, procedure or policy documents or reports that reference the reason for this or provide explanation partial or full.

I appreciate your assistance with this. There may be process/procedure documentation that cover answers to some of these questions. I do wonder whether CARM (now moved to within Medsafe I understand?) has been adequately resourced to manage 240k line entries. I understand there has been introduction of new IT systems too within this tumultuous time. Are you able to provide me with the org structure of CARM as it was for 2021-23 and the org structure of whatever replacement structure now sits within Medsafe (if that is correct).

Yours sincerely,

Catherine Jamieson

Link to this

From: OIA Requests


Attachment image.png
80K Download


Kia ora Catherine
  
Thank you for your request for official information. The reference number
for your request is: H2023032533
  
As required under the Official Information Act 1982, Manatū Hauora will
endeavour to respond to your request no later than 20 working days after
the day your request was received. If you'd like to calculate the
timeframe, you can use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [1]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/  
  
If you have any queries, please feel free to contact the OIA Services Team
on [2][email address]. If any additional factors come to light which
are relevant to your request, please do not hesitate to contact us so that
these can be taken into account. 

Under section 28(3) of the Act you have the right to ask the Ombudsman to
review any decisions made under this request. The Ombudsman may be
contacted by email at: [3][email address] or by calling 0800
802 602.

 
Ngā mihi
 
OIA Services Team
Manatū Hauora | Ministry of Health
M[4]inistry of Health information releases 
U[5]nite against COVID-19
 
 

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Catherine Jamieson

Dear OIA Requests,

Please supply the answers to these questions.

Yours sincerely,

Catherine Jamieson

Link to this

From: OIA Requests


Attachment Outlook kaheavzy.png
80K Download

Attachment H2023032271 Response.pdf
201K Download View as HTML


Kia ora Catherine
This request was consolidated with another similar request and responded
to under reference H2023032271. The response to this request was provided
to you on 6 November 2023. The response letter has been reattached for
your convinience.
Under section 28(3) of the Act, you have the right to ask the Ombudsman to
review any decisions made under this request. The Ombudsman may be
contacted by email at:
[email address] or by calling 0800 802 602.
Ngā mihi

 

OIA Services Team

Manatū Hauora | Ministry of Health

M[1]inistry of Health information releases 
U[2]nite against COVID-19 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Catherine Jamieson <[FYI request #24490 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 20 February 2024 06:46
To: OIA Requests <[email address]>
Subject: Re: Acknowledgement of your request for official information ref:
H2023032533 CRM:0261834
 
Dear OIA Requests,

Please supply the answers to these questions. 

Yours sincerely,

Catherine Jamieson

show quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Ministry of Health only: