Te Ara Tupua : Petone to Melling Post Construction Safety Audit Report
Darren Conway made this Official Information request to New Zealand Transport Agency
The request was partially successful.
From: Darren Conway
Hello
The Waka Kotahi Safe System audit guidelines 2022, page 8 states:
"Desirably a post-construction Safe System audit should be undertaken before opening the project for public use. If in practice this is not possible, the Safe System audit should be undertaken as soon after opening as possible."
This is a request for the post-construction Safe System audit report completed for the Petone to Melling cycle-way project. The request includes the Project Managers responses and decisions (normally included within the report).
This request for information specifically includes the names of the Parties to the audit including, but not limited to the:
client,
project manager,
audit team leader,
lead designer and.
road safety engineer,
I would like to point out that these parties are employed under contract, either directly as NZTA staff or consultants, to perform key roles on a publicly funded project. The names of most, if not all, of these people are already in the public domain. They have no reasonable expectation of their names being redacted from this or any report.
I look forward to receiving the report.
Yours faithfully,
Darren Conway
From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency
Kia ora Darren
This email acknowledges your below request for information made under the
Official Information Act 1982.
Your request has been forwarded to the appropriate section of NZ Transport
Agency Waka Kotahi for response. They will contact you if they require
clarification of your request, more time to respond, or if your request
has been transferred to another organisation to respond to. Unless more
time is required, NZ Transport Agency will send a response to you within
20 working days of receiving your request – in this instance on or before
10 June 2024.
If you would like to discuss your request with NZ Transport Agency, please
contact us by email at [1][NZTA request email].
Ngâ mihi
Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kôtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi
[2]twitter | [3]youtube | [4]facebook
[5][IMG]
show quoted sections
From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency
Kia ora Darren
Please find attached the response to your request of 11 May 2024 for
information under the Official Information Act 1982.
Ngā mihi
Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi
[1]twitter | [2]youtube | [3]facebook
[4][IMG]
show quoted sections
From: Darren Conway
Dear Mark Kinvig
Thank you for releasing the Safety Audit Report. It contains a lot of useful information.
I note your refusal to release the identities of those holding key roles in the project under section 9(2)(a). My request was for the identities of those holding key roles, without regard to the nature of contractual linkage to the project.
It has long been established in case law and the Ombudsman Guidance that "As a general rule, the identities of contractors awarded public sector contracts (whether by tender or not) ... should always be disclosed in the public interest." This is a quote from the case notes 175789 dated August 2008. The IOA does not define or limit the term "contractor". A person working under contract to a consultancy firm, contracted to complete work for the NZTA is a "contractor". A contractor in a key role on a public infrastructure project, paid from public funds, has no reasonable expectation of maintaining anonymity.
Yours sincerely,
Darren Conway
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Darren Conway left an annotation ()
The request for the Safety Audit Report was fulfilled.
The identities of contributors in key roles were redacted.
The quality and content of reports is directly correlated with the skill, experience and knowledge of the contributors. This is one of the reasons that reports include the identities of the contributors.
People working in key roles making decisions about publicly funded projects have no expectation of anonymity in a democratic society. Invariably the identities of contracted consultants are already in the public domain by their own choice. There is no legitimate reason to redact the identities of those people that contributed to this report.
Link to this