Criteria for NGO Vetting Services using the Authority to Release Information Form for Oranga Tamariki
Daniel Harding made this Official Information request to Oranga Tamariki—Ministry for Children
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Daniel Harding to read recent responses and update the status.
From: Daniel Harding
Dear Oranga Tamariki—Ministry for Children,
I'd like to request the policies around the criteria for NGO checks. When a check is returned, one of these statements are selected:
☐ No Information found re Applicant
☐ Information found, no concerns re Applicant
☐ Information found – concerns may remain
☐ Information found of concern regarding – Applicant
☐ Information found of concern regarding - Household Member / Family Member / Known Associate
What is the criteria for each statement above, to be selected.
Should someone have an allegation about them and OT selects, "information found - concerns may remain" - what is the likelihood of this being changed? What is the criteria for change and does OT understand that this may impact someones job in the future should there be a false allegation made? What are the steps to ensure someone who is impacted by this, is fairly treated and how does Oranga Tamariki support people who have had false allegations that are kept on their system?
Yours faithfully,
Daniel Harding
From: OIA_Requests (OT)
IN-CONFIDENCE
Tēnā koe Daniel
I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your request for information about
NGO Vetting Services under the Official Information Act 1982.
We will endeavour to respond to you as soon as possible, and in any case,
no later than 13 August 2024, being 20 working days from our receipt of
your request on 16 July 2024, as provided for under the Act.
If we are unable to respond to your request within those 20 working days,
we will notify you of an extension to that timeframe.
Nāku noa, nā
Ministerial Support
PO Box 546, Wellington 6140
* E: [1]OIA [email address]
------------------------------- This email message is intended solely for
the person or entity to which it is addressed. The information it contains
may be confidential and legally privileged. Any retransmission,
dissemination or other sharing of the contents of this email with
unauthorised persons may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify us immediately and destroy all copies of this
email. Thank you. Oranga Tamariki-Ministry for Children accepts no
responsibility for changes made to this email or to any attachments after
transmission. ------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
From: OIA_Requests (OT)
IN-CONFIDENCE
Tēnā koe Daniel Harding
Please find attached an extension letter regarding your Official
Information Act request of 16 July 2024.
Nāku noa, nā
Ministerial Support
PO Box 546, Wellington 6140
* E: [1][email address]
From: Daniel Harding <[2][FOI #27625 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 1:53 PM
To: OIA_Requests (OT) <[3][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Criteria for NGO Vetting Services
using the Authority to Release Information Form for Oranga Tamariki
[You don't often get email from
[4][FOI #27625 email]. Learn why this is
important at [5]https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]
Dear Oranga Tamariki—Ministry for Children,
I'd like to request the policies around the criteria for NGO checks. When
a check is returned, one of these statements are selected:
☐ No Information found re Applicant
☐ Information found, no concerns re Applicant ☐ Information found –
concerns may remain ☐ Information found of concern regarding – Applicant ☐
Information found of concern regarding - Household Member / Family Member
/ Known Associate
What is the criteria for each statement above, to be selected.
Should someone have an allegation about them and OT selects, "information
found - concerns may remain" - what is the likelihood of this being
changed? What is the criteria for change and does OT understand that this
may impact someones job in the future should there be a false allegation
made? What are the steps to ensure someone who is impacted by this, is
fairly treated and how does Oranga Tamariki support people who have had
false allegations that are kept on their system?
Yours faithfully,
Daniel Harding
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[6][FOI #27625 email]
Is [7][Oranga Tamariki request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to Oranga Tamariki—Ministry for Children? If so,
please contact us using this form:
[8]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. mailto:[FOI #27625 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[FOI #27625 email]
5. https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific...
6. mailto:[FOI #27625 email]
7. mailto:[Oranga Tamariki request email]
8. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
9. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
From: OIA_Requests (OT)
IN-CONFIDENCE
Tēnā koe Daniel Harding
Please find attached a response to your Official Information Act request
of 16 July 2024.
Nāku noa, nā
Ministerial Support
PO Box 546, Wellington 6140
* E: [1][email address]
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence