Source documents stating candidate endorsement in 2022 Election
Allan Taunt made this Official Information request to Canterbury Regional Council
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Allan Taunt to read a recent response and update the status.
From: Allan Taunt
Kia ora Environment Canterbury,
For the 2022 Environment Canterbury Triennial Elections, in the nominations presented on your website it stated as at 5:02pm on 12 August 2022, the following details for the candidate Lindon Boyce:
"Boyce (Boycey), Lindon (Phil Mauger Endorsed - Independent)"
This was for the Christchurch Central/Ōhoko Regional Constituency and was nominated by Stephen Moore and Nicole Moore.
This is a screenshot of what was published on your website:
https://flic.kr/p/2qKm86t
At the time I questioned via email the endorsement of Lindon Boyce by Phil Mauger, however I did not receive a response that satisfactorily explained how it came to be.
Request:
Can you please provide a copy of all the source documents you received that led to the publishing of the statement:
"Boyce (Boycey), Lindon (Phil Mauger Endorsed - Independent)"
Ngā mihi
Allan Taunt
From: LGOIMA
Canterbury Regional Council
Kia ora Allan
Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA): Request for information
I refer to your email dated 7/2/2025.
As you might be aware, LGOIMA applies to all requests for information that we receive. We are able to respond immediately to some requests, but in instances where we need to collate information we do so and respond in accordance with our specified process.
Under LGOIMA, Environment Canterbury has 20 working days to respond to your request. Your request has been passed to the person(s) responsible for responding and you will be contacted as soon as possible but no later than 7/3/2025.
Your LGOIMA reference number is 3016C.
Ngā mihi
Environment Canterbury
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request