Dear Ministry for the Environment,
On 26th April I sent an e-mail to Executive Relations Advisor Josh Bibby
informing him that I was in the possession of multiple reports (over 67 instances and growing) of chemtrails (aka "aerosol sprays") in skies over New Zealand as Reporting Officer for Citizens Government Corruption Watchdog Commission. As I have had no answer, I wish to ask 1. Has this email been received? 2. For any correspondence with other governmental staff by MfE or by Josh Bibby as a result, or on the subject of this e-mail.

Yours faithfully,
Nigel Gray

Dear Ministerials,
The answer given does not satisfy my request as the page you referred me is contradicting itself. It states that "There are six reasons that an aircraft will leave a visible trail as it flies through the sky:" and then lists 6 reasons, none of which include chemtrails. It then states "Any other discharge of material from an aircraft is prohibited by New Zealand Civil Aviation Rules"
If there are as this information page states, only 6 reasons and aircraft leaves visible contrails, then "any other discharge" would be impossible and therefore prohibiting an impossibility would be superfluous, wouldn't it?
However as my concerns are regarding this specific problem; the discharge of hazardous and toxic chemicals over New Zealand airspace, and given that you wish to call trails after an airplane "exhaust smoke" or "exhaust condensation" (and I am not referring to top-dressing planes here but specifically to jet trails), has there been any testing of these "exhaust trails" or "condensation trails" to determine chemical content by MfE?
Additionally and specifically has there been any exhaust trail or exhaust condensation trail testing of planes that fall under the "un-identified" category on the flight plane tracker?
Finally, as I am now in the possession of multiple reports of chemtrails being dropped from one end of NZ to another, with evidence to boot, and you are apparently in denial, are you satisfied that I go public, ie. media, alternative media, pamphlets and radio shows, with this evidence, or would you prefer to examine it first? Regards, Nigel Gray

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gray