Official
tina marie kahurangi made this Official Information request to Inland Revenue Department
The request was partially successful.
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear Inland Revenue Department,
Attention David Belchamber;
please provide a copy of a contract that confirms that i applied for a IRD number in 1984, according to employees under Naomi Ferguson, i was informed that the IRD number showing on your records was issued in 1984;
The age at that time was 15 years old, i am now seeking a copy of that contract for:
TAX NUMBER: 46 859 928 in accordance with the [official information act 1982] & [privacy act 1993 & 2020];
statute of Tallage 1297; "No Tallage or Aid without Assent of Parliament.
No Tallage or Aid shall be [X3taken] or levied by Us or our Heirs in our Realm, without the good will and Assent of (X4) Archbishops, Bishops, Earls, Barons, Knights, Burgesses, and other" [X5Freemen of the Land.]
As you may be aware that our constitution laws of the land is not 1986, but a declaration signed by our ancestors 1835 in perpetuity, under our national flag that was erected on this soil 20 March 1834, officially published in the New South Wales gazette 17 August 1835, an official constitution royal patent by King William IV, it is through our ancestors that we exist and through God that we are guided;
please provide a copy of the contract that caused your office to issue an IRD number in which i have no re-collection of ever signing, if you do not provide me a copy, by law you are obligated to provide a sufficient reason; if the reason is not sufficient then i demand that you cancel the number immediately, if there is no contract, there is no consent to deduct levy or taxes out of our money, fiat, credit, that you had no jurisdiction over for many years......................sincerely
Yours faithfully,
tina marie kahurangi
From: Craig O'Halloran
Inland Revenue Department
[IN CONFIDENCE RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Dear Tina Marie Kahurangi
Please find attached my response to your information request of 18 December 2021.
Kind regards
Craig O'Halloran
Officer | Inland Revenue
show quoted sections
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear Craig O'Halloran,
In relation to your letter dated 20 December 2021, my official information request has been refused because you claim no contract exists, my innerstanding is that all agencies must obtain consent, before any action to issue a IRD number can be done, and since you did not obtain consent, or obtain any form of contract or application as evidence to issue the IRD number, you have unlawfully taxed every kind of benefit, income there has ever been against the principal;
If you do not cancel the IRD number, which was unlawfully issued without consent, without knowledge, without any form of contract or disclosure, then the only choice i have is that the privacy commissioner is to be contacted, and that you are in breach of your own statutes, all corporations must obtain consent by way of contract in order to secure commercial gain;
Yours sincerely,
:tina-marie-kahurangi: house of moke
sentient, affiant
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear Craig O'Halloran,
In relation to your letter dated 20 December 2021, my official information request has been refused because you claim no contract exists, my innerstanding is that all agencies must obtain consent, before any action to issue a IRD number can be done, and since you did not obtain consent, or obtain any form of contract or application as evidence to issue the IRD number, you have unlawfully taxed every kind of benefit, income there has ever been against the principal;
If you do not cancel the IRD number, which was unlawfully issued without consent, without knowledge, without any form of contract or disclosure, then the only choice i have is that the privacy commissioner is to be contacted, and that you are in breach of your own statutes, all corporations must obtain consent by way of contract in order to secure commercial gain;
Yours sincerely,
:tina-marie-kahurangi: house of moke
sentient, affiant
From: Craig O'Halloran
Inland Revenue Department
I am out of the office until 17 January 2022. I will respond to your email
on my return.
This email and any attachment may contain confidential information. If you
have received this email or any attachment in error, please delete the
email / attachment, and notify the sender. Please do not copy, disclose or
use the email, any attachment, or any information contained in them.
Consider the environment before deciding to print: avoid printing if you
can, or consider printing double-sided. Visit us online at ird.govt.nz
tina marie kahurangi left an annotation ()
According to the [Land tax-income tax act 1908] unlawfully created by the house of representatives NZ parliament, were only to acquire voluntary taxes for land and mortgages, from their own british squatters; to this day they continue to unlawfully tax everyone out of pocket nothing to do with land or mortgages........ no consent was ever given to the NZ parliament established IRD to deduct any form of revenue, taxes were voluntary.....
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear Inland Revenue Department,
You did not obtain consent to issue a tax identification number - all agents operating under a company is to obtain consent. We now know that you have been taxing the "principal" who is the "principal" it is the legal person, who is the legal person, it is the entity named upon the birth certificate, issued by "births, deaths, & marriages department. The birth certificate is not identification of anyone, it holds no current photo, thumb print, or signature of a man, woman, boy or girl, there are no witnesses to prove you are alive.
An affidavit of life is a witnessed, public notarized instrument affirming proof of life, all estates, interests and annuities are to be returned to the one who has proof of life ' Cestui que vie act 1666' and has given that information to the agents of the NZ government agency IRD.
Cancel the IRD number immediately or verify your claim of right against the principal. You are informed that the principal is now identified, as the legal person, [person meaning entity, corporation, company, local body government], in the name of the father [surname] held in their SWIFT data, torrens system.
Updated instrument & agreements between the principal and agent affirm that all debts and liabilities have been lawfully transferred, the agent :tina-marie-kahurangi: house of moke is the authorized administrator & executor, power of attorney over the principal, instruments have never been rebutted, NZ government employees, public servants have never provided, while under oath, a sworn affidavit signed by a competent officer of the court, to verify their right of claim against the principal.
Return all unclaimed monies to the authorized administrator & executor as directed, all correspondence sent to IRD agents served to "commissioner Naomi Ferguson" are held for our records, and will be made available before a court of law.
Yours faithfully,
tina marie kahurangi
Angela left an annotation ()
A Common Law lien will be placed on Jeff Montgomery as he is engaging in criminal conduct with no signs of abating his unlawful acts.
The guy has a 2yr horticulture degree and is a Registrar General.
Says it all really Marie.
tina marie kahurangi left an annotation ()
We all have a registered lien against the principal - expressed in a security agreement between ourselves and the principal, we know that the principal which is on security paper, is not able to perform any obligation that has been set by the government agents of agencies itself - so they try to make you joinder to the name on paper, to perform those obligations outstanding......yet in your private capacity you are not obligated and without your consent they can never enforce it......
So welcome your feedback everyone and anyone responding to this official request to IRD, but moreso to express what you know and share.
From: oia
Inland Revenue Department
[IN CONFIDENCE RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Dear Tina
Thank you for your recent request.
The information you have requested does not constitute a request under the Official Information Act 1982.
To find out this information you will need to contact our customer services centre. Here is a link to our general enquiries page: https://www.ird.govt.nz/contactus/genera....
Alternatively, you may send a web message via your myIR account requesting this information.
For other queries you can find out where best to direct them at ird.govt.nz/contactus.
Kind Regards
Governanvce and Ministerial Services | Inland Revenue - Te Tari Taake
show quoted sections
Angela left an annotation ()
Inland Revenue did not exist on Moana Nui a Kiwa when our ancestors roamed the whenua, they are taxing NZ citizens and res-idents only which are of the Roman Civil Law jurisdiction of New Zealand, a statutory entity which is unlawfully squatting on our whenua.
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear oia,
A request has been made to Inland revenue to provide confirmation of an application showing a wet ink signature for an IRD number; everyone in NZ has a right to request for this information by law;
Yours sincerely,
tina marie kahurangi
Angela left an annotation ()
Tina,
The 1986 Consitution Act has no Royal Assent or Letters Patent and trust property is called RES or Corpus, hence the term RESIDENT being identifiable trust property within a DISTRICT.
We as tangata-o-te-whenua are NOT res-idents of our own lands, so Craig O'Halloran is referring to residents only and citizens, and all presumptions of being either NZ CITIZEN or British subject are rebutted unless these corporate raiders can provide the consent to the creation of their FICTIONS.
They deny they create fictions, yet their history is predicated on frauds and theft by creating these trusts which they then deny.
Blackstones commentaries and readings on the Chancery and the Common Law of England as well as Ancient Laws provides all the evidence needed.
Living people are not issued certificates, but legal entities receive a certificate of incorporation.
They need to provide the wet ink signature that gives them legal permission to create a legal entity without your knowledge and consent.
Fraud, forgery and false representation being engaged in for the sake of personal, private gain.
Living men and women of our ancestral lands are NOT trust property of this damn-nation of a corporation.
From: oia
Inland Revenue Department
[IN CONFIDENCE RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Dear Tina
Thank you for your recent request.
As previously advised, the information you have requested does not constitute a request under the Official Information Act 1982.
To find out this information, please use the correct channels as stated below. You can contact our customer services centre. Here is a link to our general enquiries page: https://www.ird.govt.nz/contactus/genera....
Alternatively, you may send a web message via your myIR account requesting this information.
For other queries you can find out where best to direct them at ird.govt.nz/contactus.
Kind Regards
Governanvce and Ministerial Services | Inland Revenue - Te Tari Taake
show quoted sections
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear Inland Revenue Department,
Release information to natural person; a copy of the application which generated a IRD number;
This request is made according to [Official information act 1982, section 12, (1AA), (a) & (b); and (1A)
All agents employeed under the corporation Inland reveue, under the NZ legislation are required to comply;
All natural persons have a right to request for any personal information which includes a signed application for a tax number;
You do have knowledge - so therefore comply
This information is copied and sent to Ombudsman 30 June 2022 along with the link
Yours faithfully,
tina marie kahurangi
From: Commissioners Correspondence
Inland Revenue Department
[IN CONFIDENCE RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Dear Tina
Thank you for your email of 30 June 2022.
The information you have requested is sensitive revenue information as defined in section 16 of the Tax Administration Act 1994 (TAA) and is subject to the confidentiality requirements of section 18 of the TAA.
As Inland Revenue cannot disclose sensitive revenue information on a public website, we sent you a response by secure message on 30 June 2022.
Kind regards
Craig O'Halloran
Officer | Inland Revenue
show quoted sections
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear Commissioners Correspondence,
the preference to receive all responses from inland revenue whether the information is sensitive or not, is to be receieved via this platform, it is in the interest of the public, that you respond through this platform, it is my choice and not the choice of the department agent, your job is to only provide the information, under your privacy act 1993, the requester can state how they would like that information; send it through this platform;
Also a reminder that this information and any other responses you make is sent to the ombudsmans 2022; unless i am satisfied that you have answered the request;
Yours sincerely,
tina marie kahurangi
From: Commissioners Correspondence
Inland Revenue Department
[IN CONFIDENCE RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Dear Tina
Thank you for your further email of 30 June 2022.
As I mentioned previously the information you have requested is sensitive revenue information as defined in section 16 of the Tax Administration Act 1994 (TAA) and is subject to the confidentiality requirements of section 18 of the TAA. You latest email does not override Inland Revenue's confidentiality requirement in section 18 of the TAA.
Inland Revenue cannot disclose sensitive revenue information on a public website. We have sent you a response by secure message on 30 June 2022.
Kind regards
Craig O'Halloran
Officer | Inland Revenue
show quoted sections
Helen Wallis left an annotation ()
Dear Tina
I'm guessing since you will have to prove that you are the "person" requesting the information they will not comply. You could be someone posing as that entity, it wouldn't be the first time.
Maybe you could post the letter received privately here as an annotation. I would be interested in seeing how they respond and also what the Ombudsman's response is.
From: tina marie kahurangi
Dear Commissioners Correspondence,
Message
Received: Thursday, Jun 30, 2022 1:06:37 PM
Subject: RE: Official Information request - Official
Dear Tina
Thank you for your further email of 30 June 2022 requesting a copy of your IRD number application.
Section 24(1)(b) of the Privacy Act 2020 applies in this situation, as sections 18, 18G and schedule 7, part B of the Tax Administration Act 1994 (TAA) are provisions that impose a prohibition, or restriction, in relation to the availability of personal information, and regulates the manner in which personal information may be obtained or made available.
The information you are requesting is sensitive revenue information as defined in section 16 of the TAA and is subject to the confidentiality requirements of section 18 of the TAA.
The information must be kept confidential under section 18 of the TAA unless a disclosure is permitted under sections 18D to 18J of the TAA. Section 18G of the TAA allows Inland Revenue to disclose sensitive revenue information to the person in relation to whom the information is held as set out in schedule 7, part B of the TAA.
Schedule 7, part B of the TAA allows Inland Revenue to disclose sensitive revenue information to the person in relation to whom the information is held only if we are satisfied that the information is readily available. The information cannot be provided to you as it is not readily available as it no longer exists.
I confirm that your IRD number was assigned to you on 3 December 1984 when you were 16 Years of age. Inland Revenue was required to hold IRD number applications from that time for a period of 10 years. As that 10-year period has now passed since you applied four your IRD number in 1984 we no longer hold your IRD number application as it has been destroyed.
While we no longer hold your IRD number application, your IRD number 046-859-928 is still your valid IRD number.
As I have declined to provide the requested information as it no longer exists you can make a complaint to the Office of the Ombudsman.
Yours sincerely
Craig O'Halloran, Officer, Inland Revenue
RESPONSE TO IRD 30 June 2022
This is an email sent to: Ombudsman, Treasury, debt management, IRD; the email states:
Attention: agent of Inland revenue;
Craig O'Halloran
Naomi Ferguson
Re: entity legal fiction: TINA MARIE KAHURANGI MOKE
Address of entity: PO Box 3724
Wellington
6140 - evidence attached:
Agent of the principal:
Beneficiary: born and known as :tina-marie-kahurangi: house of moke all lower caps identifies the woman writing this email;
your response has been published to the fyi.org.nz - and also has been copied into this email;
Employees of inland revenue could not have possibly received an application for a IRD tax number, because this woman at the age of 15 years remained in a welfare home and was released two years later; from 1984 - released 1986;
You have been writing misleading information, and i shall now make this public, the legal team of the treasury, debt management, ombudsman you are all shared into this email, to inform you that we are aware that the name upon the birth certificate has been copyright; it is not the woman who is writing this email;
We are aware that the department of births, deaths, marriages, responsible registrar did in fact cause the name on the birth certificate to be copyright, we are aware that the trust estate is held with treasury, the serial number identifies the birth certificate and how much is earned on the stock market exchange;
You have been administering this trust created in the name of the father for the sake of the beneficiary, any consent the government agents believe they have received but cannot prove, has been solely fabricated;
All rights were and always have been reserved,
THERE WAS NEVER ANY CONTRACT WITH INLAND REVENUE, they have committed fraud and a crime for taxes all kinds of benefits, income, when taxes were only created for their fictions, for their subjects, for settlers who had land here in our country;
YOU HAVE BEEN CAUGHT and you will be watched and brought to account in your private capacity liabile for fraud, and continuous crimes, your taxes only apply to legal fictions, legal persons, we are not legal - we hold equity, we are suverans, Rangatira of the land, born to the land;
Message
Yours sincerely,
tina marie kahurangi
Angela left an annotation ()
The information is sensitive because they have ZERO authority over those of us who whakapapa to the soil.
They have no constitution and no authority to govern should people find out they are a corporation with public servants that do not have Bonds to protect the public from their misbehaviour.
Pirates.
Taxes to whom?
A bunch of irresponsible criminals with a destructive ideology given jobs internationally for torturing fed up kiwis.
Taxes were only ever for NZ Citizens and they are trying to enslave us on our own lands.
Angela left an annotation ()
NZ Government is a creature of STATUTE, and cannot statutorily anoint itself powers without the consent of the people.
1986 Constitution Act has no Royal Assent, and no Letters Patent signed by Queen Elizabeth and this is necessary and essential to liability for any Acts of Parliament.
They also rely on the Electoral Act and 1688 Bill of Rights, which does not allow the setting up of Roman Catholic Courts and Star Chambers, nor the creation of arbitrary legislation.
They are PIRATES and have authority only over those entities who agree to be governed. Statutes are not the jurisdiction of tangata-o-te-whenua, they owe us Taxes for existing on our whenua without paying their dues.
Thieves.
tina marie kahurangi left an annotation ()
Awesome feed back' yes keep reminding these demon rats about their unlawful crimes' my notices sent to all government agencies remind them of their crimes.......
lets give them exposure
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Angela left an annotation ()
Tangatawhenua are not residents or occupants, taxpayers, citizens, nor do they live in districts which are all Roman Civil Law constructs.
When were we ever in Rome?
We were not, therefore a PROOF OF CLAIM is required from IRD and Craig Ohalloran as to where is the BILL OF SALE is that gives them the authority to administer living people?
1986 Constitution Act is without a wet ink signature and royal assent, therefore these ACTORS are just extorting money off our people and as it is without any conscious act or agreement, they are attempts at enslavement.
They are a constitution-less, landless squatters trying to remain relevant thieves in todays day and age.
They are squatters, and we are FIRST in Time, best in Law.
Criminal organisation is what they are because they are breaching their duty of care by trying to deny your rights to exist free of tithes on your whenua taonga tuku iho.
Link to this