Dear Department of Internal Affairs,

Kim Chambers
Maria Robertson
Jeff Montgomery

and all responsible associates

Request for official information; of a registrars job description

Request for official information of the form of authority given to registrars of BDM;

Provide any information, or legislation to show that witnessed affidavits are not accepted by the agents as evidence and proof to amend a record;

Yours faithfully,

tina marie kahurangi house of moke

Dear OIA,

internal affairs please respond here at fyi.org.nz

Yours sincerely,

tina marie kahurangi

Dear OIA,
i have read the information attached by BDM or DIA, it does not meet the requesters OIA request;

The simple request is:
Why is an affidavit of life instrument, that has been signed, finger printed, and witnessed with a seal of a public notary, not sufficient enough to amend the outdated information held with the registrar of BDM or DIA;

What authorizes the registrar to not amend the record, and what is their job description;

We do not wish for information from their websites, its not sufficient, we would like information that would satisfy the request;

Another matter: why do agencies escape answering simple, but genuine requests by using the OIA to refuse information when we are certain that information does exist, its been held in secret;

Cease the secrecy and provide the public the truth; for once and the requests will cease;
nga mihi
: tina-marie-kahurangi:

Yours sincerely,

tina marie kahurangi

Dear SDO Official Correspondence,

You have not answered my request appropriately, sending my request to "your" internal affairs, OIA website doesn't satisfy the requestors request;
https://www.dia.govt.nz/official-informa...

Request to provide me the NZ legislation that states an affidavit of life is not sufficient to amend a record;

Request for information of what is SUFFICIENT
Request for information of how to get the record amended
Request for information of how to bring agents of this corporation to account if they do not amend the record according to their own legislation [privacy act 2020, s22 principle 7]; besides your friend the Ombudsman?

Request to provide me under the jurisdiction of common law, a sufficient reason why a record that holds wrong information cannot be updated and amended;

Internal affairs agents refrain from using the Official information request to refuse requests under a certain section; as i am aware that the ombudsmans office, was to investigate, the use of certain legislation used by agents of agencies to justify not releasing the information, that people of the nation have a God given birth right to view;

Yours sincerely,

tina marie kahurangi

Dear SDO Official Correspondence,
fyi response

De jure Woman <[email address]>
Attachments
8:18 AM (3 minutes ago)
to privacy

Attention: Julia Taylor

in relation to your OIA response, [attached]

This is not a name change request; and that this request should be passed on to the Registrar, or Maria Robertson - Kim Chambers or those who are in charge of instructing to amend the record and provide a statement of correction. [privacy act 2020, s22, principle 7]

Department of internal affairs was sent 100 documents, which shows that a baby was born and discharged, which also shows that the information written by hospital, ministry of justice, internal affairs about the baby is incorrect, inaccurate and misleading.

Now is the time that the department of internal affairs must amend their records and include the AFFIDAVIT OF LIFE
LIVE -LIFE-CLAIM
Which shows the proper identity of the woman; the photos, the thumbprints and the witnesses, are more sufficient than filiing a statutory declaration.

The mother and fathers names and location are also inaccurate and must be amended.

A statutory declaration can never identify a man or woman, there has to be a photo, fingerprints and witnesses.

Under the law of the land we are not required to fill out any statutory declaration, in order to instruct a corporate employee to amend the record.

The documents and instruments that were posted to bdm, and signed indicating they were received: registered post number: LW117274077NZ.

The documents were addressed to MARIA ROBERTSON & KIM CHAMBERS and they by law should respond why they wont amend their record.

They were given a written statement of correction, instructing them of their errors, mistakes, and misleading information sitting on their records; that require amending.

They were sent documents of birth certificates that claim not to identify the person, on the bottom of it, therefore if a birth certificate states that it doesnt identify a woman or a man, then i have provided an affidavit of life, x2 and the live-life-claim, that does identify the woman.

Maria Robertson, if you are not the corporate person to amend your records, then refer it to the right person, sitting in the national office Wellington, who has the authority to instruct their colleagues to amend their records;

We by law of the land, under our constitution signed by our tupuna, under the Declaration of independence 1835, are not obligated to accept your forms by you, but that if you hold any information about us as a people, then we have the right to instruct you to amend your records;

The NZ legislation applies to you under your corporate official capacity, the law of the land applies to us, as tangata whenua, as whakapapa, as wairua.

You shall amend your records and provide us a statement of correction -

published with fyi.org.nz

We

2
Attachments
• Scanned by Gmail

Yours sincerely,

tina marie kahurangi