Collisions between active mode users
Tim Adriaansen made this Official Information request to Auckland Transport
Response to this request is long overdue. By law Auckland Transport should have responded by now (details and exceptions). The requester can complain to the Ombudsman.
From: Tim Adriaansen
Dear Auckland Transport,
In a recent safety assessment conducted by Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency, the agency concluded there was "a significant risk of a death or serious injury to active users" in a particular shared-path use case.
Auckland has several paths of similar length, width and gradient as the proposed shared path in this assessment, which suggests that if the assessment is accurate, then such a risk is likely to have occurred frequently across the transport network.
Please may I have a record of the total number of collisions between active mode users of all types (please include user type information), the type of collision (head on, side-swipe etc.) and the severity (minor, serious, fatal) for each of the following, since opening of the facility or over the last 5 years (please note: a spreadsheet export of CAS data with this information for these locations would be a suitable response):
- Nelson Street Cycleway
- Grafton Gully Shared Path
- Glenn Innes to Tamaki Drive Stage 1
May I also please have a summary of the total number of collisions between active mode users (pedestrian vs cyclist, cyclist vs cyclist, e-scooter vs pedestrian etc) across the Auckland region which resulted in either a serious injury or death, by year, for each of the last 5 years.
Yours faithfully,
Tim Adriaansen
From: Tim Adriaansen
Dear Auckland Transport,
Can you please confirm that you have received and are actioning my information request dated 6 July 2022?
Warm regards,
Tim Adriaansen
From: AT Official Information (AT)
Auckland Transport
Kia ora Tim,
Auckland Transport (AT) acknowledges receipt of your request for official
information dated the 7th of July 2022 relating to cycling emissions
reduction data.
We hope to respond to your request as soon as possible, but not later than
the 4th of August 2022, which is 20 working days after the day your
request was received. If we aren’t able to respond to your request by
then, we will notify you of an extension of that timeframe.
Your case is being managed by Anna, who is one of our LGOIMA Business
partners. If you have any further queries, you can contact the team on
(09) 355 3553 during business hours, quoting Local Government Official
Information request number CAS-591275-L0K8P4.
Ngâ mihi,
Peter | Customer Care Coordinator
Customer Care| Case Management
Level 5, 20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010
P 09 355 3553
[1]www.at.govt.nz
We all have an important part to play in helping to reduce the spread of
COVID-19 in our communities. [2]Find the latest information and advice
from Auckland Transport. For the latest news from the Ministry of Health
go to the [3]Unite Against Covid-19 website.
Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be
confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this
email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies
of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this
message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email
may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of Auckland Transport.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.at.govt.nz/
2. https://at.govt.nz/COVID-19
3. https://covid19.govt.nz/
From: Tim Adriaansen
Dear AT Official Information (AT),
Thank you for your response.
Please note that the information sent through to me in response to this request in no way addresses or answers the LGOIMA request which I sent through on July 6th, and later referred to on July 18th, which was a request for crash analysis data between road users outside of a vehicle. For completeness, I will copy the entire request below.
While I understand this was likely due to a clerical error, I am now requesting that you expedite this request as it is long overdue. This data should be relatively easy to export by anyone with access to the crash analysis system.
The original request is below from July 6 is below:
"Dear Auckland Transport,
In a recent safety assessment conducted by Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency, the agency concluded there was "a significant risk of a death or serious injury to active users" in a particular shared-path use case.
Auckland has several paths of similar length, width and gradient as the proposed shared path in this assessment, which suggests that if the assessment is accurate, then such a risk is likely to have occurred frequently across the transport network.
Please may I have a record of the total number of collisions between active mode users of all types (please include user type information), the type of collision (head on, side-swipe etc.) and the severity (minor, serious, fatal) for each of the following, since opening of the facility or over the last 5 years (please note: a spreadsheet export of CAS data with this information for these locations would be a suitable response):
- Nelson Street Cycleway
- Grafton Gully Shared Path
- Glenn Innes to Tamaki Drive Stage 1
May I also please have a summary of the total number of collisions between active mode users (pedestrian vs cyclist, cyclist vs cyclist, e-scooter vs pedestrian etc) across the Auckland region which resulted in either a serious injury or death, by year, for each of the last 5 years.
Yours faithfully,
Tim Adriaansen"
Thankyou,
Tim
Yours sincerely,
Tim Adriaansen
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence