TeiTei Drive Ohakune development that was recently applied for in a resource consent
Barry Murphy made this Official Information request to Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
The request was partially successful.
From: Barry Murphy
Dear Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities,
RE: TeiTei Drive Ohakune development that has recently applied for resource consent.
On 25th July between 10-11am, I had a call with Giles Tait & Renee Regal of Kainga Ora via Zoom.
12:52mins into the call Giles Tait stated that the concept designs had been "high level tested and proved that the sections regardless of size could accomodate an outcome", "and some of those outcomes are single story level"
16:52mins into the call, Renee agreed to check with MSD, how many people are waiting for houses in Ohakune town vs the statistic available for the region (Ruapehu) which is 72 families or individuals.
17:28mins Renee stated she was very aware of all the properties available on the market for sale and they have a set standard for existing homes and that 9/10 they are more so looking for land opportunities.
18:00mins Renee stated the standard called "Dimension" when they are considering existing properties.
19:37mins Giles stated that 15 state house titles would be in KO ownership and the remaining 29 would go through the market "through people we would typically want to work with"
20:15mins Giles stated "The only way you can build an affordable home is to discount the land"
On 27th June I received the following response from KO via email "Kāinga Ora will work with other agencies and key stakeholders in the community to ensure local services, such as schools and medical services, are prepared for population growth"; my concern was around Amenities & Services in the area and the lack of a GP and schooling capacity.
1./ Could I please be provided with the "high level tested and proved" designs for single story buildings for the consideration for the Ohakune LOTS 300-450sqm in size as they were not part of the building consent application; only 2 level designs were included.
2./ Could I please be provided with the number of people waiting on housing in the "Ohakune" (for the Ruapehu region this is 72) , please also provide the bedroom requirements to make up homes (i.e. 20 x 1 bedroom, 10 x 2 bedroom, 3 x 3 bedroom).
3./ Could I please be provided with the reviews done on existing properties for sale in the Ohakune Region in the last 12 months, along with the date the review had been done. I.e. I would like to understand which houses have been considered and then declared not fit for KO standards, along with any that may have passed the "Dimension" standard
4./ Please provide the same for land purchase reviews that have been considered for Ohakune in the last 24 months, along with addresses, LOT numbers and any reports produced.
5./ Considering Ohakune is far from any major town or city that has supplies, and the lack of builders in the region, I would like to see costing including materials, travel to Ohakune & accomodation for the builders. What is the average cost to build per sqm in the Ohakune region for KO based on these rural elements.
6./ Who will the 29 remaining sections in Stage 1 be listed with, or how will they be sold. Essentially, there is 15 "workers accomodation" properties that WPI was mentioned as a possible buyer; how would they go about purchasing these at a discount and at what discount?
7./ Which developers are KO currently in discussion with to build the homes in Ohakune; if this is commercially sensitive, can you advise how many you are in talks with and their locations; I'm trying to gauge if these builders are local or out of town.
8./ What engagement and communication has KO had with doctors/medical practitioners/other departments around schooling and health capacity? Please provide dates of when these occurred.
9./ Has any report been provided or exist on the impact and value loss, to the Snowmass subdivision next door and to the Carrot Park by having this intensified social housing and affordable houses next door. Please provide these.
10./ Could you please link me to, or if not available on the web, provide the "Dimension" standards that KO goes by when looking at existing properties.
11./ Can you please confirm that Taumarunui was not the intended initial location for this CIP Infrastructure Reference Group funding, and that the project was not moved to Ohakune because of a land claim; please provide all related documents to the CIP funding and any modifications through the process.
Yours faithfully,
Barry Murphy
From: Kainga Ora Correspondence
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
Kia ora Barry
Thank you for your request below, dated 28 July 2023, for information
under the Official Information Act 1982
(OIA).
We will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible and in
any event no later than 28 August 2023, being 20 working days after the
day your request was received by Kāinga Ora in accordance with section
15(1) of the OIA.
If we are unable to respond to your request by then, we will notify you of
an extension of that timeframe.
We may also contact you if further clarification or refinement of your
request is required to enable a decision to be made.
Ngā mihi
Donna
[1]KO
logo
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Murphy <[2][FOI #23628 email]>
Sent: Friday, 28 July 2023 11:02 PM
To: Gru FYI <[3][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - TeiTei Drive Ohakune development
that was recently applied for in a resource consent
[You don't often get email from
[4][FOI #23628 email]. Learn why this is
important at [5]https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: External email. Do not click or open attachments unless you
recognise the sender and know the content is safe. If unsure use the
Report Phishing button.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities,
RE: TeiTei Drive Ohakune development that has recently applied for
resource consent.
On 25th July between 10-11am, I had a call with Giles Tait & Renee Regal
of Kainga Ora via Zoom.
12:52mins into the call Giles Tait stated that the concept designs had
been "high level tested and proved that the sections regardless of size
could accomodate an outcome", "and some of those outcomes are single story
level"
16:52mins into the call, Renee agreed to check with MSD, how many people
are waiting for houses in Ohakune town vs the statistic available for the
region (Ruapehu) which is 72 families or individuals.
17:28mins Renee stated she was very aware of all the properties available
on the market for sale and they have a set standard for existing homes and
that 9/10 they are more so looking for land opportunities.
18:00mins Renee stated the standard called "Dimension" when they are
considering existing properties.
19:37mins Giles stated that 15 state house titles would be in KO ownership
and the remaining 29 would go through the market "through people we would
typically want to work with"
20:15mins Giles stated "The only way you can build an affordable home is
to discount the land"
On 27th June I received the following response from KO via email "Kāinga
Ora will work with other agencies and key stakeholders in the community to
ensure local services, such as schools and medical services, are prepared
for population growth"; my concern was around Amenities & Services in the
area and the lack of a GP and schooling capacity.
1./ Could I please be provided with the "high level tested and proved"
designs for single story buildings for the consideration for the Ohakune
LOTS 300-450sqm in size as they were not part of the building consent
application; only 2 level designs were included.
2./ Could I please be provided with the number of people waiting on
housing in the "Ohakune" (for the Ruapehu region this is 72) , please also
provide the bedroom requirements to make up homes (i.e. 20 x 1 bedroom, 10
x 2 bedroom, 3 x 3 bedroom).
3./ Could I please be provided with the reviews done on existing
properties for sale in the Ohakune Region in the last 12 months, along
with the date the review had been done. I.e. I would like to understand
which houses have been considered and then declared not fit for KO
standards, along with any that may have passed the "Dimension" standard
4./ Please provide the same for land purchase reviews that have been
considered for Ohakune in the last 24 months, along with addresses, LOT
numbers and any reports produced.
5./ Considering Ohakune is far from any major town or city that has
supplies, and the lack of builders in the region, I would like to see
costing including materials, travel to Ohakune & accomodation for the
builders. What is the average cost to build per sqm in the Ohakune region
for KO based on these rural elements.
6./ Who will the 29 remaining sections in Stage 1 be listed with, or how
will they be sold. Essentially, there is 15 "workers accomodation"
properties that WPI was mentioned as a possible buyer; how would they go
about purchasing these at a discount and at what discount?
7./ Which developers are KO currently in discussion with to build the
homes in Ohakune; if this is commercially sensitive, can you advise how
many you are in talks with and their locations; I'm trying to gauge if
these builders are local or out of town.
8./ What engagement and communication has KO had with doctors/medical
practitioners/other departments around schooling and health capacity?
Please provide dates of when these occurred.
9./ Has any report been provided or exist on the impact and value loss, to
the Snowmass subdivision next door and to the Carrot Park by having this
intensified social housing and affordable houses next door. Please provide
these.
10./ Could you please link me to, or if not available on the web, provide
the "Dimension" standards that KO goes by when looking at existing
properties.
11./ Can you please confirm that Taumarunui was not the intended initial
location for this CIP Infrastructure Reference Group funding, and that the
project was not moved to Ohakune because of a land claim; please provide
all related documents to the CIP funding and any modifications through the
process.
Yours faithfully,
Barry Murphy
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[6][FOI #23628 email]
Is [7][Kāinga Ora request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities? If so, please contact us
using this form:
[8]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kāinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
References
Visible links
2. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
5. https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific...
6. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
7. mailto:[Kāinga Ora request email]
8. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
9. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
From: Kainga Ora Correspondence
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
Kia Ora
Regarding your request below, Kāinga Ora is extending the timeframe for
making a decision on your Official Information Act 1982 (OIA) request, to
22 September 2023.
Consultations are required to make a decision on your request.
This extension is made in accordance with section 15A(1)(b) of the OIA:
consultations necessary to make a decision on the request are such that a
proper response to the request cannot reasonably be made within the
original time limit.
We will endeavour to respond to you as soon as possible within this
timeframe. You have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman about
the decision to extend this timeframe.
Ngā mihi
[1]KO
logo
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Murphy <[2][FOI #23628 email]>
Sent: Friday, 28 July 2023 11:02 PM
To: Gru FYI <[3][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - TeiTei Drive Ohakune development
that was recently applied for in a resource consent
[You don't often get email from
[4][FOI #23628 email]. Learn why this is
important at [5]https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: External email. Do not click or open attachments unless you
recognise the sender and know the content is safe. If unsure use the
Report Phishing button.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities,
RE: TeiTei Drive Ohakune development that has recently applied for
resource consent.
On 25th July between 10-11am, I had a call with Giles Tait & Renee Regal
of Kainga Ora via Zoom.
12:52mins into the call Giles Tait stated that the concept designs had
been "high level tested and proved that the sections regardless of size
could accomodate an outcome", "and some of those outcomes are single story
level"
16:52mins into the call, Renee agreed to check with MSD, how many people
are waiting for houses in Ohakune town vs the statistic available for the
region (Ruapehu) which is 72 families or individuals.
17:28mins Renee stated she was very aware of all the properties available
on the market for sale and they have a set standard for existing homes and
that 9/10 they are more so looking for land opportunities.
18:00mins Renee stated the standard called "Dimension" when they are
considering existing properties.
19:37mins Giles stated that 15 state house titles would be in KO ownership
and the remaining 29 would go through the market "through people we would
typically want to work with"
20:15mins Giles stated "The only way you can build an affordable home is
to discount the land"
On 27th June I received the following response from KO via email "Kāinga
Ora will work with other agencies and key stakeholders in the community to
ensure local services, such as schools and medical services, are prepared
for population growth"; my concern was around Amenities & Services in the
area and the lack of a GP and schooling capacity.
1./ Could I please be provided with the "high level tested and proved"
designs for single story buildings for the consideration for the Ohakune
LOTS 300-450sqm in size as they were not part of the building consent
application; only 2 level designs were included.
2./ Could I please be provided with the number of people waiting on
housing in the "Ohakune" (for the Ruapehu region this is 72) , please also
provide the bedroom requirements to make up homes (i.e. 20 x 1 bedroom, 10
x 2 bedroom, 3 x 3 bedroom).
3./ Could I please be provided with the reviews done on existing
properties for sale in the Ohakune Region in the last 12 months, along
with the date the review had been done. I.e. I would like to understand
which houses have been considered and then declared not fit for KO
standards, along with any that may have passed the "Dimension" standard
4./ Please provide the same for land purchase reviews that have been
considered for Ohakune in the last 24 months, along with addresses, LOT
numbers and any reports produced.
5./ Considering Ohakune is far from any major town or city that has
supplies, and the lack of builders in the region, I would like to see
costing including materials, travel to Ohakune & accomodation for the
builders. What is the average cost to build per sqm in the Ohakune region
for KO based on these rural elements.
6./ Who will the 29 remaining sections in Stage 1 be listed with, or how
will they be sold. Essentially, there is 15 "workers accomodation"
properties that WPI was mentioned as a possible buyer; how would they go
about purchasing these at a discount and at what discount?
7./ Which developers are KO currently in discussion with to build the
homes in Ohakune; if this is commercially sensitive, can you advise how
many you are in talks with and their locations; I'm trying to gauge if
these builders are local or out of town.
8./ What engagement and communication has KO had with doctors/medical
practitioners/other departments around schooling and health capacity?
Please provide dates of when these occurred.
9./ Has any report been provided or exist on the impact and value loss, to
the Snowmass subdivision next door and to the Carrot Park by having this
intensified social housing and affordable houses next door. Please provide
these.
10./ Could you please link me to, or if not available on the web, provide
the "Dimension" standards that KO goes by when looking at existing
properties.
11./ Can you please confirm that Taumarunui was not the intended initial
location for this CIP Infrastructure Reference Group funding, and that the
project was not moved to Ohakune because of a land claim; please provide
all related documents to the CIP funding and any modifications through the
process.
Yours faithfully,
Barry Murphy
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[6][FOI #23628 email]
Is [7][Kāinga Ora request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities? If so, please contact us
using this form:
[8]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kāinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
References
Visible links
2. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
5. https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific...
6. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
7. mailto:[Kāinga Ora request email]
8. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
9. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
From: Kainga Ora Correspondence
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
Kia ora Barry
Please find attached a letter in relation to your request below. The
letter advises you of a partial transfer of your request.
Ngā mihi
Donna
[1]KO
logo
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Murphy <[2][FYI request #23628 email]>
Sent: Friday, 28 July 2023 11:02 PM
To: Gru FYI <[3][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - TeiTei Drive Ohakune development
that was recently applied for in a resource consent
[You don't often get email from
[4][FYI request #23628 email]. Learn why this is
important at [5]https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: External email. Do not click or open attachments unless you
recognise the sender and know the content is safe. If unsure use the
Report Phishing button.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities,
RE: TeiTei Drive Ohakune development that has recently applied for
resource consent.
On 25th July between 10-11am, I had a call with Giles Tait & Renee Regal
of Kainga Ora via Zoom.
12:52mins into the call Giles Tait stated that the concept designs had
been "high level tested and proved that the sections regardless of size
could accomodate an outcome", "and some of those outcomes are single story
level"
16:52mins into the call, Renee agreed to check with MSD, how many people
are waiting for houses in Ohakune town vs the statistic available for the
region (Ruapehu) which is 72 families or individuals.
17:28mins Renee stated she was very aware of all the properties available
on the market for sale and they have a set standard for existing homes and
that 9/10 they are more so looking for land opportunities.
18:00mins Renee stated the standard called "Dimension" when they are
considering existing properties.
19:37mins Giles stated that 15 state house titles would be in KO ownership
and the remaining 29 would go through the market "through people we would
typically want to work with"
20:15mins Giles stated "The only way you can build an affordable home is
to discount the land"
On 27th June I received the following response from KO via email "Kāinga
Ora will work with other agencies and key stakeholders in the community to
ensure local services, such as schools and medical services, are prepared
for population growth"; my concern was around Amenities & Services in the
area and the lack of a GP and schooling capacity.
1./ Could I please be provided with the "high level tested and proved"
designs for single story buildings for the consideration for the Ohakune
LOTS 300-450sqm in size as they were not part of the building consent
application; only 2 level designs were included.
2./ Could I please be provided with the number of people waiting on
housing in the "Ohakune" (for the Ruapehu region this is 72) , please also
provide the bedroom requirements to make up homes (i.e. 20 x 1 bedroom, 10
x 2 bedroom, 3 x 3 bedroom).
3./ Could I please be provided with the reviews done on existing
properties for sale in the Ohakune Region in the last 12 months, along
with the date the review had been done. I.e. I would like to understand
which houses have been considered and then declared not fit for KO
standards, along with any that may have passed the "Dimension" standard
4./ Please provide the same for land purchase reviews that have been
considered for Ohakune in the last 24 months, along with addresses, LOT
numbers and any reports produced.
5./ Considering Ohakune is far from any major town or city that has
supplies, and the lack of builders in the region, I would like to see
costing including materials, travel to Ohakune & accomodation for the
builders. What is the average cost to build per sqm in the Ohakune region
for KO based on these rural elements.
6./ Who will the 29 remaining sections in Stage 1 be listed with, or how
will they be sold. Essentially, there is 15 "workers accomodation"
properties that WPI was mentioned as a possible buyer; how would they go
about purchasing these at a discount and at what discount?
7./ Which developers are KO currently in discussion with to build the
homes in Ohakune; if this is commercially sensitive, can you advise how
many you are in talks with and their locations; I'm trying to gauge if
these builders are local or out of town.
8./ What engagement and communication has KO had with doctors/medical
practitioners/other departments around schooling and health capacity?
Please provide dates of when these occurred.
9./ Has any report been provided or exist on the impact and value loss, to
the Snowmass subdivision next door and to the Carrot Park by having this
intensified social housing and affordable houses next door. Please provide
these.
10./ Could you please link me to, or if not available on the web, provide
the "Dimension" standards that KO goes by when looking at existing
properties.
11./ Can you please confirm that Taumarunui was not the intended initial
location for this CIP Infrastructure Reference Group funding, and that the
project was not moved to Ohakune because of a land claim; please provide
all related documents to the CIP funding and any modifications through the
process.
Yours faithfully,
Barry Murphy
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[6][FYI request #23628 email]
Is [7][Kāinga Ora request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities? If so, please contact us
using this form:
[8]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kāinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
References
Visible links
2. mailto:[FYI request #23628 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[FYI request #23628 email]
5. https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific...
6. mailto:[FYI request #23628 email]
7. mailto:[Kāinga Ora request email]
8. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
9. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
From: Kainga Ora Correspondence
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
image002.jpg
6K
Download
Barry Murphy OI 23 395 reply.pdf
264K
Download
View as HTML
Housing Standard Design Minimum Floor Areas.pdf
1.1M
Download
View as HTML
230313 IGL 4819 Ohakune Masterplan Preapp Page 9.pdf
16.1M
Download
View as HTML
Kia ora Barry
Please find attached a response to your request (two additional
attachments).
Ngā mihi
www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kāinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
From: Barry Murphy
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
Thanks for the master plans file dated 13 march 2023 and note on page 8 that the test was done using a single parking space, which does not abide by district plan.
The house is also 1.624m from front boundary where district plan requires 3m under RE3.3.5, rear also appears to not comply
Also seems weird to have 2 bathrooms on a 2 bedroom house, that’s supposed to be affordable or social housing based.
Page 9 shows another house layout with a 1m boundary on the side, the district plan RE3.3.5 states a 1.5m side boundary is required.
Page 10 shows a concept being built on the boundary, with no space to neighbour.
Page 11 onwards shows no swale, no parking, no services and seems wrong
1./ Car parking and maneuvering areas on the site and minimum 2 car parks do not comply, how did this test comply and who signed off on it?
2./ What size is the land on page 8, as I dont see it stated, was this for 300sqm or 450sqm?
3./ What size is the land on page 9, its not stated.
4./ What size is the land on page 10, its not stated.
5./ Both concepts appear to fail the district plan, how were these tested against RDC district plan, and how did you consider they passed and by whom signed it off?
6./ No swale or parking is shown from page 11 onwards, how has this been decided to comply and signed off by who?
7./ Please advise how these tests passed without meeting the district plans.
Regards
Barry Murphy
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
From: Barry Murphy
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
Please urgently resend 230313 IGL 4819 Ohakune Masterplan Preapp Page 9.pdf attachment broken into two files as it appears corrupt
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
From: Barry Murphy
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
As per page 8, 9 & 10, its evident more drawings of neighbouring properties were drawn.
I also like to request, all the concepts that have been done for Teitei Drive for lot layouts or housing options.
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
From: Kainga Ora Correspondence
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
Kia ora Barry
I see that you have sent further correspondence regarding the Masterplan
document referred to below.
We will assume you can now access this document. Please let us know if
this is not the case.
Kind regards
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Murphy <[1][FOI #23628 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 23 September 2023 2:10 PM
To: Kainga Ora Correspondence
<[2][email address]>
Subject: Re: Barry Murphy OI 23 395 - response email
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: External email. Do not click or open attachments unless you
recognise the sender and know the content is safe. If unsure use the
Report Phishing button.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
Please urgently resend 230313 IGL 4819 Ohakune Masterplan Preapp Page
9.pdf attachment broken into two files as it appears corrupt
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
-----Original Message-----
Kia ora Barry
Please find attached a response to your request (two additional
attachments).
Ngā mihi
[3]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
- your guide to finding and using New Zealand government services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of
Kāinga Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are
confidential, may be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the
person responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, you have
received this message in error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #23628 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[5]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kāinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
2. mailto:[email address]
3. http://www.govt.nz/
4. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
5. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
From: Barry Murphy
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
I had to use an online PDF repairer to open it which broke formatting; if you could please provide a document split in two so I can open it correctly.
Please also not my followup question as to the rest of the masterplan files as its evident that other lots were drafted, so I'd like a copy of all of those please.
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
From: Kainga Ora Correspondence
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
Kia ora Barry
Thank you for your two requests, dated 23 September 2023, for information
under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), as
below
We will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible and in
any event no later than 24 October 2023, being 20 working days after the
day your request was received by Kāinga Ora in accordance with section
15(1) of the OIA.
If we are unable to respond to your request by then, we will notify you of
an extension of that timeframe.
We may also contact you if further clarification or refinement of your
request is required to enable a decision to be made.
Regards
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
As per page 8, 9 & 10, its evident more drawings of neighbouring
properties were drawn.
I also like to request, all the concepts that have been done for Teitei
Drive for lot layouts or housing options.
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Murphy <[1][FYI request #23628 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 23 September 2023 9:18 AM
To: Kainga Ora Correspondence
<[2][email address]>
Subject: Re: Barry Murphy OI 23 395 - response email
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: External email. Do not click or open attachments unless you
recognise the sender and know the content is safe. If unsure use the
Report Phishing button.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
Thanks for the master plans file dated 13 march 2023 and note on page 8
that the test was done using a single parking space, which does not abide
by district plan.
The house is also 1.624m from front boundary where district plan requires
3m under RE3.3.5, rear also appears to not comply Also seems weird to have
2 bathrooms on a 2 bedroom house, that’s supposed to be affordable or
social housing based.
Page 9 shows another house layout with a 1m boundary on the side, the
district plan RE3.3.5 states a 1.5m side boundary is required.
Page 10 shows a concept being built on the boundary, with no space to
neighbour.
Page 11 onwards shows no swale, no parking, no services and seems wrong
1./ Car parking and maneuvering areas on the site and minimum 2 car parks
do not comply, how did this test comply and who signed off on it?
2./ What size is the land on page 8, as I dont see it stated, was this for
300sqm or 450sqm?
3./ What size is the land on page 9, its not stated.
4./ What size is the land on page 10, its not stated.
5./ Both concepts appear to fail the district plan, how were these tested
against RDC district plan, and how did you consider they passed and by
whom signed it off?
6./ No swale or parking is shown from page 11 onwards, how has this been
decided to comply and signed off by who?
7./ Please advise how these tests passed without meeting the district
plans.
Regards
Barry Murphy
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
-----Original Message-----
Kia ora Barry
Please find attached a response to your request (two additional
attachments).
Ngā mihi
[3]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
- your guide to finding and using New Zealand government services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of
Kāinga Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are
confidential, may be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the
person responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, you have
received this message in error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FYI request #23628 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[5]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kāinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[FYI request #23628 email]
2. mailto:[email address]
3. http://www.govt.nz/
4. mailto:[FYI request #23628 email]
5. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
From: Kainga Ora Correspondence
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities
Kia ora Barry
Please find attached a response to your two requests below.
Regards
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
As per page 8, 9 & 10, its evident more drawings of neighbouring
properties were drawn.
I also like to request, all the concepts that have been done for Teitei
Drive for lot layouts or housing options.
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Murphy <[1][FOI #23628 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 23 September 2023 9:18 AM
To: Kainga Ora Correspondence
<[2][email address]>
Subject: Re: Barry Murphy OI 23 395 - response email
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: External email. Do not click or open attachments unless you
recognise the sender and know the content is safe. If unsure use the
Report Phishing button.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Kainga Ora Correspondence,
Thanks for the master plans file dated 13 march 2023 and note on page 8
that the test was done using a single parking space, which does not abide
by district plan.
The house is also 1.624m from front boundary where district plan requires
3m under RE3.3.5, rear also appears to not comply Also seems weird to have
2 bathrooms on a 2 bedroom house, that’s supposed to be affordable or
social housing based.
Page 9 shows another house layout with a 1m boundary on the side, the
district plan RE3.3.5 states a 1.5m side boundary is required.
Page 10 shows a concept being built on the boundary, with no space to
neighbour.
Page 11 onwards shows no swale, no parking, no services and seems wrong
1./ Car parking and maneuvering areas on the site and minimum 2 car parks
do not comply, how did this test comply and who signed off on it?
2./ What size is the land on page 8, as I dont see it stated, was this for
300sqm or 450sqm?
3./ What size is the land on page 9, its not stated.
4./ What size is the land on page 10, its not stated.
5./ Both concepts appear to fail the district plan, how were these tested
against RDC district plan, and how did you consider they passed and by
whom signed it off?
6./ No swale or parking is shown from page 11 onwards, how has this been
decided to comply and signed off by who?
7./ Please advise how these tests passed without meeting the district
plans.
Regards
Barry Murphy
Yours sincerely,
Barry Murphy
-----Original Message-----
Kia ora Barry
Please find attached a response to your request (two additional
attachments).
Ngā mihi
[3]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
- your guide to finding and using New Zealand government services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of
Kāinga Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are
confidential, may be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the
person responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, you have
received this message in error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #23628 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[5]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kāinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.
Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
2. mailto:[email address]
3. http://www.govt.nz/
4. mailto:[FOI #23628 email]
5. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Communications between RDC and KO since 28th feb
To Ruapehu District Council by Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc
Barry Murphy left an annotation ()
22nd September or sooner should have response.
Link to this