Printed from https://fyi.org.nz./request/26717-contract-requirements-and-quality-assurance-for-patha-update-of-guidelines on October 17, 2024 00:25

Contract requirements and quality assurance for PATHA update of guidelines

B Evans made this Official Information request to Health New Zealand

The request was partially successful.

From: B Evans

Dear Health New Zealand,

Health New Zealand has commissioned PATHA “to update the national guidelines and referral pathways for gender-affirming healthcare. Clinical director for primary and community care Dr Sarah Clarke said that was expected to be completed by August” (https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/5140...).

My OIA request is as follows:

1) What was the process in commissioning PATHA for the above? Please provide criteria, emails, briefs, meeting minutes etc.

2) How has PATHA shown Health New Zealand that they are reputable, evidence-based, and independent of the culture/ideology wars currently raging in the transgender healthcare space?

3) What are the requirements of the work to be completed by PATHA for the above? e.g.:
Systematic review of evidence to date?;
Full and transparent methodology and data used in systematic evidence review, to be freely publicly available?;
The medical, ethical or other standards that the review, guidelines and pathways must adhere to and state comprehensively?

4) What are the deliverables of the work to be completed by PATHA for the above? e.g:
Report to the Minister of Health on the state of ‘gender-affirming care’ in NZ - using data from around the NZ, split by Region and type and age of care?; trends over-time, concerns?
GP-ready publishable guidelines for evidence-based care for gender-questioning persons including non-medicalised pathways?;
Website-ready explanations of best -practice for gender questioning patients?;
What else?

5) What is the cost of this contract with PATHA? Please specify different elements and deliverables and their dates; a copy of the contract and any correspondence about the contract.

6) The Cass Review Final Report gave PATHA's last guidelines the 2nd to lowest score of all guidelines globally (149/600).
What is the quality assurance process for reviewing what PATHA produces now to ensure it is accurate, comprehensive, balanced and evidence-based?

7) What are the current “referral pathways”?

Kind regards,

B Evans

Link to this

From: hnzOIA

Tēnā koe, 

 

Thank you for contacting Health NZ, Te Whatu Ora. This is an automatic
reply to confirm that we have received your email.  Depending on the
nature of your request you may not receive a response for up to 20 working
days.  We will try to respond to your query as quickly as possible.

 

 

Ngā mihi

 

Health NZ, Te Whatu Ora.

Statement of confidentiality: This email message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use,
disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this message

Link to this

From: hnzOIA

Attachment image.png
81K Download

Attachment HNZ00047611 Response.pdf
235K Download View as HTML

Attachment Appendix 2 Payment and invoicing schedule REDACTIONS DRAFTED Redacted.pdf
660K Download View as HTML

Attachment Appendix 1 Request for Proposals Redacted.pdf
1.9M Download View as HTML

Kia ora B Evans,
 
Thank you for your request for information regarding Contract requirements
and quality assurance for PATHA update of guidelines on 13 May
2024. Please find attached our response to your request.
 
If you have any questions, please get in touch at
[1][email address].
 
If you are not happy with this response, you have the right to make a
complaint to the Ombudsman. Information about how to do this is available
at [2]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phoning 0800 802 602.
 
 
Ngā mihi  
 
Obaid (He/him)
Government Services
Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora
[3]TeWhatuOra.govt.nz
 
Statement of confidentiality: This email message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use,
disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this message

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Health New Zealand request email]
2. file:///tmp/
3. http://tewhatuora.govt.nz/

Link to this

From: B Evans

Dear hnzOIA,

Thank you for your response to my OIA, reference: HNZ00047611. I wish to clarify some of your answers therein.

1) In Appendix 1 of your response:
“This request for proposal (RFP) is an invitation to suitably qualified suppliers to submit a proposal for the ‘Gender-Affirming Primary Care – Update to Guidelines for Gender-Affirming Care’, contract opportunity. This is a closed single-step procurement process.”

Please explain the basis for the closed nature of this contract process (which is a departure from the All of Government best practice procurement rules) and provide the usual supporting information/documentation:
a) the rationale document (Rule 14);
b) which organisations were invited to submit a proposal/tender;
c) which organisations submitted a proposal/tender;
d) GETS contract award notice and date of its publication (Rule 48).

2) “The part of your request which asks for emails, briefs, meeting minutes, etc, is refused under sections 9(2)(g)(i) and section 9(2)(b)(ii) of the Act. This is to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions by or between employees of any public service organisation in the course of their duty as the release of this information would be likely to unreasonably prejudice the commercial position of the organisation who supplied it. It is in the public interest that such information continues to be supplied.”

Could you please clarify how the ‘commercial position’ of an organisation (i.e. PATHA) that cites itself as an ‘interdisciplinary professional association’ and whose Incorporated Society Rules state that “Pecuniary gain is not a purpose of the Society” would be unreasonably prejudiced by the release of information of our public servant’s discourse regarding this contract and what constitutes best care for our gender questioning youth/adults and the services to provide this care?
I request you please reconsider your initial refusal and consider how you might at least partially meet my request?

3) In Appendix 1 of your response, the RFP, there are at least three references to being ‘aligned with WPATH SOC v8’. However, WPATH Standards of Care (SOC8) are currently being questioned and are under intense scrutiny1,2,3,4,5.
a. Given that the contract awarded to PATHA to update the NZ guidelines for 'gender affirming care' requires them to use SOC8 as 'best practice', what steps are Te Whatu Ora taking to amend that contract and/or otherwise take into account recent developments that indicate that WPATH SOC8 may NOT be best practice? Please provide emails, letters, memos, briefs, meeting minutes, reports, and legal opinions regarding this matter.

4) You respond that: “…the draft guidelines will be reviewed by clinical stakeholders and undergo a sign out process to ensure that contents are clinically and culturally safe.”
Please provide documentation on this ‘sign out process’ (such as any applicable policy, procedure, memo or advisory documents) including definitions of what is meant by ‘clinical stakeholders’, ‘clinically safe’ and ‘culturally safe’ in this context. Please list the clinical stakeholders (where this might be problematic such as a single individual, please list the organisation/group that that single individual is a representative of).

Sincerely,
B Evans

Footnotes:
1. Cass Review https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/... – re WPATH, pg 28, 130-132
2. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
3. https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom/gen...
4. Research into trans medicine has been manipulated. The Economist, 27 June 2024. https://www.economist.com/united-states/...
5. Opinion: The crucial questions about gender care are not political or legal. We need to know whether treatments benefit most children who receive them. 2 July 2024 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/...

Sincerely,

B Evans

Link to this

From: hnzOIA

Tēnā koe, 

 

Thank you for contacting Health NZ, Te Whatu Ora. This is an automatic
reply to confirm that we have received your email.  Depending on the
nature of your request you may not receive a response for up to 20 working
days.  We will try to respond to your query as quickly as possible.

 

 

Ngā mihi

 

Health NZ, Te Whatu Ora.

Statement of confidentiality: This email message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use,
disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this message

Link to this

From: hnzOIA

Attachment image.png
81K Download

Tçnâ koe 

Thank you for your email of 4 July 2024, asking for the following
information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act):

I wish to clarify some of your answers therein.
1)    In Appendix 1 of your response:
“This request for proposal (RFP) is an invitation to suitably qualified
suppliers to submit a proposal for the ‘Gender-Affirming Primary Care –
Update to Guidelines for Gender-Affirming Care’, contract opportunity.
This is a closed single-step procurement process.” 
Please explain the basis for the closed nature of this contract process
(which is a departure from the All of Government best practice procurement
rules) and provide the usual supporting information/documentation:
a)    the rationale document (Rule 14);
b)    which organisations were invited to submit a proposal/tender;
c)    which organisations submitted a proposal/tender;
d)    GETS contract award notice and date of its publication (Rule 48).
2)    “The part of your request which asks for emails, briefs, meeting
minutes, etc, is refused under sections 9(2)(g)(i) and section 9(2)(b)(ii)
of the Act. This is to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs
through the free and frank expression of opinions by or between employees
of any public service organisation in the course of their duty as the
release of this information would be likely to unreasonably prejudice the
commercial position of the organisation who supplied it. It is in the
public interest that such information continues to be supplied.”
Could you please clarify how the ‘commercial position’ of an organisation
(i.e. PATHA) that cites itself as an ‘interdisciplinary professional
association’ and whose Incorporated Society Rules state that “Pecuniary
gain is not a purpose of the Society” would be unreasonably prejudiced by
the release of information of our public servant’s discourse regarding
this contract and what constitutes best care for our gender questioning
youth/adults and the services to provide this care? 
I request you please reconsider your initial refusal and consider how you
might at least partially meet my request?
3)    In Appendix 1 of your response, the RFP, there are at least three
references to being ‘aligned with WPATH SOC v8’. However, WPATH Standards
of Care (SOC8) are currently being questioned and are under intense
scrutiny1,2,3,4,5. 
a.    Given that the contract awarded to PATHA to update the NZ guidelines
for 'gender affirming care' requires them to use SOC8 as 'best practice',
what steps are Te Whatu Ora taking to amend that contract and/or otherwise
take into account recent developments that indicate that WPATH SOC8 may
NOT be best practice? Please provide emails, letters, memos, briefs,
meeting minutes, reports, and legal opinions regarding this matter.
4)    You respond that: “…the draft guidelines will be reviewed by
clinical stakeholders and undergo a sign out process to ensure that
contents are clinically and culturally safe.”
Please provide documentation on this ‘sign out process’ (such as any
applicable policy, procedure, memo or advisory documents) including
definitions of what is meant by ‘clinical stakeholders’, ‘clinically safe’
and ‘culturally safe’ in this context. Please list the clinical
stakeholders (where this might be problematic such as a single individual,
please list the organisation/group that that single individual is a
representative of).

This email is to let you know that Health NZ needs more time to make a
decision on your request.

The Act requires that we advise you of our decision on your request no
later than 20 working days after the day we received your request.
Unfortunately, it will not be possible to meet that time limit and we are
therefore writing to notify you of an extension of the time to make our
decision, to 29 August 2024 at the latest.

This extension is required because the volume of information is such that
a proper response cannot reasonably be made within the original time
limit.

If you have any questions, please contact us
at [1][email address].

If you are not happy with this extension, you have the right to make a
complaint to the Ombudsman. Information about how to do this is available
at [2]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phoning 0800 802 602.

 

Nâku iti noa, nâ

 
Government Services
Office of the Chief Executive

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora

Statement of confidentiality: This email message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use,
disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this message

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Health New Zealand request email]
2. http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/

Link to this

From: hnzOIA

Attachment image.png
81K Download

Attachment HNZ00055705 OIA response 21082024.pdf
252K Download View as HTML

Attachment HNZ00055705 Appendix 4 Response form 2 Pricing proposal.pdf
643K Download View as HTML

Attachment HNZ00055705 Appendix 3 Response form 1 Questions relating to evaluation criteria.pdf
724K Download View as HTML

Attachment HNZ00055705 Appendix 5 Conflict of Interest Declaration and Confidentiality Agreement.pdf
753K Download View as HTML

Attachment HNZ00055705 Appendix 2 Recommendation Report Guidelines RFP Redacted.pdf
1.1M Download View as HTML

Attachment HNZ00055705 Appendix 1 Final Procurement Plan Updating guidlines 1 March Redacted.pdf
1.9M Download View as HTML

Kia ora,
 
Thank you for your request for information about Gender Affirming Primary
Care on 4 July 2024. Please find attached our response to your request.
 
If you have any questions, please get in touch at
[1][email address].
 
If you are not happy with this response, you have the right to make a
complaint to the Ombudsman. Information about how to do this is available
at [2]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or by phoning 0800 802 602.
 
Ngā mihi, 

Mark Fenwick
Government Services
[3][email address]    

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora
 
Statement of confidentiality: This email message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use,
disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this message

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Health New Zealand request email]
2. file:///tmp/
3. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Health New Zealand only: