Information regarding Tim Jago
Gus M made this Official Information request to Christopher Luxon
Currently waiting for a response from Christopher Luxon, they must respond promptly and normally no later than (details and exceptions).
From: Gus M
Dear Christopher Luxon,
It is an absolute disgrace that the party involved with Tim Jago has both the Minister for Children and the Minister for Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence.
This is a massive conflict of interest by association of policies and ideals. Yet you went into agreement with this as Prime Minister.
Under the Offical Information Act 1982, please provide all information you and your office holds that mentions or alludes to Tim Jago.
Yours faithfully,
Gus M
From: Christopher Luxon (MIN)
Christopher Luxon
Kia ora Gus,
Thank you for your email received 31st January 2025, in which you submitted an Official Information Act request as follows:
Provide all information you and your office holds that mentions or alludes to Tim Jago.
Your request is being considered in accordance with the Act, and you can expect a response by 3rd March 2025 (date determined by the OIA calculator).
Ngā mihi nui
Sonya Ford
Correspondence Lead Advisor | Office of Rt Hon Christopher Luxon
Prime Minister
Minister for National Security and Intelligence
Minister Responsible for Ministerial Services
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
show quoted sections
From: Gus M
Dear Cameron Burrows
Thank you for your response.
I am happy with and totally understand the second, third, and fourth paragraphs (after quoting the request) of your response. If the only information held is correspondence from members of the public and news articles, so be it, it can be refused.
However, your first paragraph is not fully answering my request as it is Christopher Luxon's role as Prime Minister, not as Leader of the National Party, to appointment his ministers, his cabinet, and to delegate ministerial portfolios. Information mentioning or alluding to Tim Jago may have been presented and considered as part of making those decisions.
I am therefore not satisfied that this aspect of the request has been responded to. Please advise if this response will be reconsidered.
Yours sincerely,
Gus M
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Steve curran left an annotation ()
There is No conflict of interest as Jago was never a minister and never held a seat or confidence of the constituents.
The party have independent actors in those mentioned portfolios with no influence from the now known sex offender.
It's incredulous that opponents will always draw the longest bow to score points at others expense.
FYI National voter past labour life voter and borderline ACT supporter but fair suck of the Sav.
Steve curran Hawkes Bay
Link to this