Dear Wellington City Council,

I hereby request the following information (D1.P1), whilst talking into account the information immediately succeeding this sentence (D1.P2) (with restrictions in place; notably D1) [and with due respect for the listed order]:

Division 1:
Part 1:
- D1.P1.1 Infringement Offence(s):
• D1.P1.1A “Parking within an area marked with broken yellow lines,” or
• D1.P1.1B “In that you being a person in charge of a motor vehicle [Insert Licence Plate] did cause it or allow it to be parked on part of a roadway marked with a broken yellow line,” or
• D1.P1.1C “No person, being the driver, shall stop, stand or park a vehicle whether attended or unattended on a road controlled by the marking of a broken yellow line.”

Part 2:
- D.1P2.1 Explanation (with due regard) to a specific rejection towards an Infringement Notice Cancellation:
• D1.P2.1A “The explanation provided does not demonstrate the parking of the vehicle on the prohibited area was done in an emergency.”

- Any reason(s) as to why (if applicable) any Infringement Notice has been cancelled (in contradiction/opposition to addition information [as stated within the D1.P2.1 interjections], whilst taking into account (in all its fullness) the reason(s) [as stated within the D1.P1.1 interjections], and preceding the date of submission for a time period not exceeding or deceeding one year; whilst taking into account any pertinent information, in regards to the above question, a list, of the following information (if applicable), of whether or not, [a(/any)] taxi service vehicle(s), [a] bus(es) (both as stated [and in contradiction to what is written] within the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004, specifically Part 1 – Preliminary Provisions, Section 1.6 – Interpretation), [an] emergency service vehicle(s) (whilst not responding to or on route to, at, or fro to an emergency),[a] garbage collection vehicle(s) (whether or not they are currently operating whilst on a job), [a] courier vehicle(s) (not limited to any specific company, and whilst they are operating on a job), that has acted without due regard taken to D1.P1.1 (and any subsequent interjections under this Part) and D.1.P2.1 and in which the response was a cancellation of an Infringement Notice due to action taken by the Wellington City Council, which contradicts what is stated in D1.P2.1A.

Yours faithfully,

M Paroli

Dear Chris Brown,

Thank you for your response.

In regards to where you state, “and explain the use of the prefixes D1.P1.1 etc, as they do not have any relevance that we can see to parking/vehicle infringement rules”; if you read what I asked carefully, it actually explains it.

However, on that note, I will rearrange my request into a simpler way in the hopes that the Wellington City Council can understand fully that I am asking.

So, here it is:

Any reason(s) as to why an Infringement Notice has been cancelled (for any of the reasons as listed immediately succeeding this sentence):

• “Parking within an area marked with broken yellow lines.”
• “In that you being a person in charge of a motor vehicle [Insert Licence Plate] did cause it or allow it to be parked on part of a roadway marked with a broken yellow line.”
• “No person, being the driver, shall stop, stand or park a vehicle whether attended or unattended on a road controlled by the marking of a broken yellow line.”

Specifically for any of the following vehicles types, but not limited to any of the below:
• [a(/any)] taxi service vehicle(s),
• [a] bus(es) (as stated within the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004, specifically Part 1 – Preliminary Provisions, Section 1.6 – Interpretation),
• [an] emergency service vehicle(s) (whilst not responding to or on route to, at, or fro to an emergency),
• [a] garbage collection vehicle(s) (whether or not they are currently operating whilst on a job),
• [a] courier vehicle(s) (not limited to any specific company, and whether or not they are operating on a job),
• [a] private motor vehicle(s)
• [a] council motor vehicle(s)
• [a(/any)] company vehicle(s) [of any type or variation]

In which any of the above vehicle types have acted without due regard taken to any of the reasons listed above, and in which the response was a cancellation of an Infringement Notice due to action taken by the Wellington City Council, which contradicts what is stated below:

“The explanation provided does not demonstrate the parking of the vehicle on the prohibited area was done in an emergency.”

The above is for a time period not exceeding or deceeding one calendar year from the date of my original question.

Yours sincerely,

M Paroli

Dear Chris Brown,

Thanks for that. That did summarize what I was after.

Yours sincerely,

M Paroli