Leaked C19 Vaccine Reports and Correspondence Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris
M Bell made this Official Information request to University of Auckland
The request was refused by University of Auckland.
From: M Bell
Dear University of Auckland,
Please provide the following:
Any published or unpublished report or analysis produced by Paynter or Petousis-Harris evaluating or debunking the claims of excess mortalities from Covid 19 vaccines by any of either Barry Young, Steve Kirsch or Denis Rancourt. For search purposes relates to this subject after Sept 2023.
All correspondence between Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris relating to the recent whistleblower leak of covid vaccine data. For search purposes this can be confined to after Nov 30 2023.
All correspondence between Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris about the report produced from Rancourt et al re excess mortality and covid vaccine. For search purposes this can be confined to after 17 Sept 23.
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=...
Yours faithfully,
M Bell
From: Landon Watt
University of Auckland
Dear M Bell,
I refer to your request below. The University of Auckland (the University)
has been consulting with Auckland UniServices Ltd (UniServices) about your
request. From that consultation, I understand that the information
requested is more closely connected with their functions. In these
circumstances, the University is required to transfer your request to
UniServices for their response under section 14(b)(ii) of the Official
Information Act (OIA). You can expect a response from them in due course.
Under section 28(3) of the OIA, you have the right to ask the Ombudsman to
review any decisions made under this request.
Yours sincerely,
Landon Watt
Legal Advisor
Office of the Vice-Chancellor
Waipapa Taumata Rau | University of Auckland
From: M Bell <[1][FOI #25731 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 12:12 PM
To: legal <[2][University of Auckland request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Leaked C19 Vaccine Reports and
Correspondence Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris
Dear University of Auckland,
Please provide the following:
Any published or unpublished report or analysis produced by Paynter or
Petousis-Harris evaluating or debunking the claims of excess mortalities
from Covid 19 vaccines by any of either Barry Young, Steve Kirsch or Denis
Rancourt. For search purposes relates to this subject after Sept 2023.
All correspondence between Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris
relating to the recent whistleblower leak of covid vaccine data. For
search purposes this can be confined to after Nov 30 2023.
All correspondence between Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris about
the report produced from Rancourt et al re excess mortality and covid
vaccine. For search purposes this can be confined to after 17 Sept 23.
[3]https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=...
Yours faithfully,
M Bell
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #25731 email]
Is [5][University of Auckland request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to University of Auckland? If so, please contact us using this
form:
[6]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[7]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[FOI #25731 email]
2. mailto:[University of Auckland request email]
3. https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=...
4. mailto:[FOI #25731 email]
5. mailto:[University of Auckland request email]
6. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
7. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
From: Farleigh Quinlivan
University of Auckland
Dear M Bell
I acknowledge receipt of your official information request, submitted to
the University of Auckland on 14 February 2024 and subsequently
transferred to Auckland UniServices Limited (UniServices) on 16 February
2024.
I refer to your request for information under the Official Information Act
1982 (OIA), for information related to correspondence between Janine
Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris and Ministry of Health data.
We will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible and in
any event no later than 15 March 2024, being 20 working days after the day
your request was received. If we are unable to respond to your request by
then, we will notify you of an extension of that timeframe.
You have the right under section 28(3) of the OIA to seek an investigation
and review by the Ombudsman of this decision. Information about how to
make a complaint is available at [1]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or
freephone 0800 802 602.
Yours sincerely
Farleigh Quinlivan
Farleigh Quinlivan | Risk and Compliance Manager
[2][email address] | [3]www.uniservices.co.nz
Auckland UniServices Ltd.,
Level 10, 49 Symonds St, Auckland, New Zealand
c/- The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019,
Victoria St West, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Disclaimer:This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are CONFIDENTIAL
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing,
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of
this information is strictly prohibited.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
2. mailto:[email address]
3. http://www.uniservices.co.nz/
From: Farleigh Quinlivan
University of Auckland
Dear M Bell,
Please see letter attached.
Kind regards
Farleigh
Farleigh Quinlivan | Risk and Compliance Manager
[1][email address] | [2]www.uniservices.co.nz
Auckland UniServices Ltd.,
Level 10, 49 Symonds St, Auckland, New Zealand
c/- The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019,
Victoria St West, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Disclaimer:This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are CONFIDENTIAL
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing,
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of
this information is strictly prohibited.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.uniservices.co.nz/
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
M Bell left an annotation ()
Request refused, no such document(s) or correspondence could be found.
According to Steve Kirsch both scientists have viewed the leaked data, furthermore both have also commented publicly about the data suggesting the excess death claims are baseless. Hence because of these facts it is very hard to believe that there could be no such document analyzing the data and likewise that there would be zero correspondence between them about it.
What other options from there?
They analyzed the data in their heads without producing a report?
They have removed the information from the university system?
They produced reports but outside the university system?
They did not really look but just made stuff up to support their predetermined narrative?
Link to this