Silent Weapons for Quiet (invisible) Wars
Melanie Lorraine Petrowski made this Official Information request to Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
The request was refused by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
From: Melanie Lorraine Petrowski
Dear Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,
Because a Sonic Weapon (Sound Cannons - two long range acoustic devices (LRADs) were used in the Wellington anti-mandate protest just over a year ago in February and March 2022 by the NZ Police against their own citizens causing skin rashes, burns, and many other symptoms including pain, headaches and tiredness; and because chronic fatigue is becoming rife in this country at the moment, I would like to ask - Is the New Zealand Government currently using any of these (silent) weapons against its own citizens?:
• DEW (Direct Energy Weapons)?
• Any Low Frequency devices or technology that can emit radiation at long distances? (May include street lights and 5G cell phone towers).
• Geoengineering? This has many names, ie solar radiation management (SRM), cloud seeding, chemtrails including spraying barium, aluminium, graphene or other chemicals or nanoparticles; or weather manipulation creating storms and floods? Is NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Limited) involved? And is it possible to site the CV’s or work history of all the foreigners working at NIWA?
• HAARP - High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program? Is there a “research program” in Birdlings Flat, Christchurch or anyway else in New Zealand? These can also create earthquakes and steer storms causing great harm to people.
* Any other weapons used by "the elite special tactics group" on New Zealand citizens?
* And is there any foreign military personnel or agents working with the NZ Government on using any of the above?
Any information would be much appreciated.
Yours faithfully,
Concerned Citizen
Melanie Petrowski
From: Information [DPMC]
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
Tēnā koe,
Thank you for emailing the Department of the Prime Minister and
Cabinet (DPMC), including the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA).
Please note, DPMC cannot respond to emails that are outside its scope. If
the subject of your email doesn't relate to the work of DPMC, we
will forward your email to the appropriate Minister or agency who will
respond to you directly. To find out more about DPMC's functions please
view our website [1]https://dpmc.govt.nz/ .
If your correspondence is intended for the Prime Minister please email his
office at [2][email address].
Contact information for other Members of Parliament can be found
at [3]https://www.parliament.nz/en/get-involve...
you're writing about an issue relating to COVID-19, we encourage you to
first refer to the [4]COVID-19 website.
Here’s a list of links that you may find helpful:
* [5]Latest news
* [6]Financial support
* [7]Travel and the border
* [8]Mental wellbeing, accessing health care and violence protection
* [9]Proactive release of Government Response documents
* [10]Managed Isolation and Quarantine
If you're showing symptoms of COVID-19, please call your local GP or
contact the Healthline team on 0800 358 5453.
Common questions:
* Official Information Act (OIA) requests will be formally acknowledged
during office hours and actioned accordingly. For more information
about the statutory OIA timeframes please see
[11]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/.
* For Job opportunities within DPMC see
[12]https://centralagenciesjobs.cass.govt.nz.... Please use
this website to apply for vacancies. Resumes received through other
avenues will not be considered.
* New Zealand Visas and requests for asylum are managed by Immigration
New Zealand. Please see [13]https://www.immigration.govt.nz/.
We hope one of the above links helps answer your question. Thanks again
and please take care.
Link: [14]File-List
Link: [15]Edit-Time-Data
Link: [16]themeData
Link: [17]colorSchemeMapping
show quoted sections
From: Information [DPMC]
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
[IN-CONFIDENCE]
Kia ora,
Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA)
received on 20 March 2023, copied below. We will respond to your request
within the statutory timeframes set out in the Act. If we are unable to
meet these timeframes we will notify you.
Your request will be managed by the Ministerial Services team within DPMC.
If you have any queries, please feel free to contact us at
[1][DPMC request email].
DPMC may publish the response to your OIA request. If we publish the
response your personal information, including your name and contact
details, will be removed.
Ngā mihi,
Ministerial Coordinator
Ministerial Services
Strategy, Governance and Engagement
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
E [2][DPMC request email]
The information contained in this email message is for the attention of
the intended recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
communication of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. If you
are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy or distribute
this message or the information in it. If you have received this message
in error, please destroy the email and notify the sender immediately.
show quoted sections
From: Information [DPMC]
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
[UNCLASSIFIED]
Kia ora koe,
Please see the attached letter regarding your recent OIA request.
Ngā mihi,
Ministerial Coordinator
Ministerial Services
Strategy, Governance and Engagement
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
E [1][DPMC request email]
The information contained in this email message is for the attention of
the intended recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
communication of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. If you
are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy or distribute
this message or the information in it. If you have received this message
in error, please destroy the email and notify the sender immediately.
Link: [2]File-List
Link: [3]Edit-Time-Data
Link: [4]themeData
Link: [5]colorSchemeMapping
show quoted sections
The information contained in this email message is for the attention of
the intended recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
communication of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. If you
are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy or distribute
this message or the information in it. If you have received this message
in error, please destroy the email and notify the sender immediately.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[DPMC request email]
2. file:///tmp/Signature_files/filelist.xml
3. file:///tmp/Signature_files/editdata.mso
4. file:///tmp/Signature_files/themedata.thmx
5. file:///tmp/Signature_files/colorschememapping.xml
6. file:///tmp/Signature_files/filelist.xml
7. file:///tmp/Signature_files/editdata.mso
8. file:///tmp/Signature_files/themedata.thmx
9. file:///tmp/Signature_files/colorschememapping.xml
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
The 2nd Commission of Inquiry Into Weaponization of the Biosphere: You may visit this website dedicated to its ongoing progress with more testimony videos to be embedded: https://commission.itnj.org/weaponisatio...
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Weather Manipulation + Warfare, Climate Control, Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP + Lasers.
They’ve been doing this for decades. The general public were just so full & intoxicated with toxin & distraction buffets that no one really paid attention. Even now, society has a hard time swallowing these truths even when it’s on the news, testimonials in government hearings & courts, published on government websites & press releases, commercials made by defense agencies & hundreds of patents.
“These white aircraft spray trails are the result of scientifically verifiable spraying of aluminum particles & other toxic heavy metals, polymers & chemicals." -Retired USAF brigadier general Gen. Charles Jones
"Millions of tons of aluminum and barium (BA-AL) are being sprayed almost daily across the U.S. Just sprinkle aluminum or barium dust on a fire and see what happens. It's near explosive. When wildfires break out, the aluminum/barium dust results in levels of fire intensity so great as to cause firefighters to coin a new term ̶ firenados.” -former naval officer
Aluminum Dust from Geoengineering Fueling Super Wildfires According to Author
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases...
Dragonfire proving trials underway | Press Release | MBDA
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicatio...
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
https://www.wanttoknow.info/war/haarp_we...
The European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility."
-- From documentary on HAARP weather control capabilities by Canada's CBC
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), operating under an agreement with the Air Force, has started 13 new "experiments" radiating the upper atmosphere and ionosphere with up to 3.6 megawatts of power. The Air Force originally developed and owned HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) but transferred the facility to UAF in August 2015. The program is made possible by a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), one of the original drivers of Weather and Climate Modification in 1965.
These experiments are another example of the lack of meaningful ethical and moral standards in technology. For example, what are the environmental and human health bio-effects of HAARP deploying massive amounts of ( PULSED ) Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MW)? Questions such as this are absent from the "scientific" discussion regarding the pollution footprint created by these reckless "experiments".
While HAARP may be new to many, research of this kind has been ongoing and explored by militaries as game-changing weaponry, especially since the brain is the battlefield of modern warfare.
A 1975 DARPA report titled, SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY stated:
"The Institute for the Study of the Brain (sic) of the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior." -p.85
Bioethics in technology is urgently needed to reign in systems and programs which have the potential to harm and destroy life on Earth. -Z5G
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Neuroscientist Dr James Giordano. Neuro-Weapons. Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Brain Implants.
Presenting developments in the field of 'Neuro-Weapons'. 'The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future' on 09/25/18 at the Modern War Institute, United States Military Academy West Point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Wu89LXT...
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
The US Government’s High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) was discontinued in 2014 because it became ‘obsolete’. During its operation, government and top scientists became very concerned about its possibly catastrophic effects on Earth. The big question remains… if HAARP is now obsolete—what has replaced it?
Originally aired: 1998
Original Source: haarp.com
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k3cMRTw0J...
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) Environmental Health (2022) 21:92
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC
and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.
Abstract
In the late-1990s, the FCC and ICNIRP adopted radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits to protect the public
and workers from adverse effects of RFR. These limits were based on results from behavioral studies conducted in the
1980s involving 40–60-minute exposures in 5 monkeys and 8 rats, and then applying arbitrary safety factors to an
apparent threshold specific absorption rate (SAR) of 4 W/kg. The limits were also based on two major assumptions: any
biological effects were due to excessive tissue heating and no effects would occur below the putative threshold SAR,
as well as twelve assumptions that were not specified by either the FCC or ICNIRP. In this paper, we show how the past
25 years of extensive research on RFR demonstrates that the assumptions underlying the FCC’s and ICNIRP’s exposure
limits are invalid and continue to present a public health harm. Adverse effects observed at exposures below the
assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy,
carcinogenicity, sperm damage, and neurological effects, including electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Also, multiple
human studies have found statistically significant associations between RFR exposure and increased brain and thyroid
cancer risk. Yet, in 2020, and in light of the body of evidence reviewed in this article, the FCC and ICNIRP reaffirmed
the same limits that were established in the 1990s. Consequently, these exposure limits, which are based on false sup-
positions, do not adequately protect workers, children, hypersensitive individuals, and the general population from
short-term or long-term RFR exposures. Thus, urgently needed are health protective exposure limits for humans and
the environment. These limits must be based on scientific evidence rather than on erroneous assumptions, especially
given the increasing worldwide exposures of people and the environment to RFR, including novel forms of radiation
from 5G telecommunications for which there are no adequate health effects studies.
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Entire climate narrative shown up as a sham by Science Mag (AAAS--the biggest scientist organization in the US) and the WaPo
They did a great job burying this HUGE story. Turns out we are in a several million year cold spell and nothing bad will happen if we get a bit warmer. Go to the WaPo article to see all the graphics
Look at the graph and ignore the politically correct, ignorant quotations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-e...
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this requestAct on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Atmospheric Geoengineering + Historic rainfall/cloud coverage
To National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Limited by Jonty Piers
Geoengineering and Impacts on NZ Weather
To National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Limited by Chris McCashin
Key Solar Radiation Modification surveillance and policy and execution activities in NZ or internationally
To Ministry of Transport by Paul
Legislation Governing Skies / Atmosphere
To Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand by Chris McCashin
Susan left an annotation ()
This request was refused on the grounds that the information requested does not exist.
I don't know whether this refusal is legal or not. If it isn't, the only legal redress would involve providing irrefutable evidence that the information requested DOES exist.
In order to do this, the questioner should probably snip their blanket request for information into a number of more specific questions, on each of which they have some actual evidence that something HAS been done.
TPTB clearly are DOING stuff that harms us-the-people. They're doing it in secret and they're clearly not averse to lying about it, provided they can do so in broad, general terms. In order to get them to admit ... well, anything really ... we-the-people have to provide forensic-level evidence that some particular thing has been done and then ask for specific information about it that CLEARLY DOES exist. Only then can the Ombudsman tell them to deliver such specific information. In other words, OIA requests don't work unless you already know exactly what information you want and who holds it. It's all a rather disgusting chess game.
Link to this